10-year experience of Paediatric varicocele embolization in a tertiary centre with long-term follow-up.


Journal

Journal of pediatric urology
ISSN: 1873-4898
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2022
Historique:
received: 21 10 2021
revised: 10 12 2021
accepted: 23 12 2021
pubmed: 26 1 2022
medline: 7 6 2022
entrez: 25 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Paediatric varicocele embolization has many benefits over surgical ligation, but lacks published long-term data. We investigated technical and clinical outcomes in this under reported patient group. To evaluate technical success, complications and recurrence rates following varicocele embolization in paediatric patients. A single-centre retrospective review of procedural data and electronic notes of consecutive patients referred for varicocele embolization over a 10-year period was performed (February 2010-March 2020). The primary outcomes were technical success and clinical efficacy (lack of symptom recurrence). Secondary outcomes included complications, testicular vein size reduction and procedural parameters including radiation exposure. Chi-square analysis was used to identify predictors of clinical success. Follow-up involved outpatient clinical assessment and telephone interview. 40 patients (median age 15) were referred for left-sided symptomatic varicocele. Technical embolization success was achieved in 36/40 patients (90%), with 4 procedures abandoned (inaccessible vein). Embolization technique was platinum-based coils ± sclerosant. There were no immediate or long-term procedural complications. 32/36 patients completed short term follow-up at a median interval of 2.8 months. 30/32 (93.78%) experienced early clinical success. We found a significant reduction in peritesticular vein size following embolization (pre-3.70 vs post-2.56 mm, p = 0.00017) and a significant relationship between varicocele grade and early clinical success (χ2 = 4.2, p = 0.04), but not pre-treatment peritesticular vein size (χ2 = 0.02, p = 0.88). 33/36 patients completed long-term follow-up (median 4.2 years, range 0.36-9.9 years) producing a late clinical success rate of 93.9% (31/33). No post procedural complications including hydroceles were identified. This study demonstrates technical success, matching rates described in adult patients which is reassuring and in support of embolization in the younger patient cohort. More importantly, the overall clinical success rate is comparable with previous embolization studies. Reassuringly, all symptom recurrences occurred early in follow-up, and there is a cogent argument for a single follow-up appointment at this juncture. Our long-term average follow-up duration, primarily gained via telephone interview, exceeds other studies. Although our study has the longest follow-up for varicocele embolization in children, it is limited by a few patients being lost to early and long-term follow-up. This is a recognised issue faced by studies attempting to follow-up benign conditions with a high clinical success rate. Paediatric varicocele embolization is a successful alternative to surgical ligation, with no complications and good clinical outcomes over a long-term follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35074274
pii: S1477-5131(21)00597-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.12.013
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

113.e1-113.e6

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest None.

Auteurs

Simon Wong (S)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Ganesh Vigneswaran (G)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Drew Maclean (D)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Timothy Bryant (T)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Nigel Hacking (N)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Ben Maher (B)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Bhaskar Somani (B)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Sengamalai Manoharan (S)

Department of Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Ewan Brownlee (E)

Department of Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Stephen Griffin (S)

Department of Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Sachin Modi (S)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK. Electronic address: sachin.modi@uhs.nhs.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH