Cochlear Implant in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma without Tumor Removal.
acoustic schwannoma
cochlear implant
intralabyrinthine schwannoma
Journal
Audiology research
ISSN: 2039-4330
Titre abrégé: Audiol Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101644681
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jan 2022
10 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
30
09
2021
revised:
27
12
2021
accepted:
04
01
2022
entrez:
25
1
2022
pubmed:
26
1
2022
medline:
26
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Background: Schwannomas of the vestibulocochlear nerve are benign, slow-growing tumors, arising from the Schwann cells. When they originate from neural elements within the vestibule or cochlea, they are defined as intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILSs). Cochlear implant (CI) has been reported as a feasible solution for hearing restoration in these patients. (2) Methods: Two patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) due to sudden sensorineural hearing loss and ipsilateral tinnitus were the cases. MRI detected an ILS. CI was positioned using a standard round window approach without tumor removal. (3) Results: The hearing threshold was 35 dB in one case and 30 dB in the other 6 mo after activation. Speech audiometry with bisillables in quiet was 21% and 27% at 65 dB, and the tinnitus was completely resolved or reduced. In the localization test, a 25.9° error azimuth was obtained with CI on, compared to 43.2° without CI. The data log reported a daily use of 11 h and 14 h. In order to not decrease the CI's performance, we decided not to perform tumor exeresis, but only CI surgery to restore functional binaural hearing. (4) Conclusions: These are the sixth and seventh cases in the literature of CI in patients with ILS without any tumor treatment and the first with SSD. Cochlear implant without tumor removal can be a feasible option for restoring binaural hearing without worsening the CI's performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35076488
pii: audiolres12010004
doi: 10.3390/audiolres12010004
pmc: PMC8788267
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
33-41Références
Otol Neurotol. 2004 Mar;25(2):160-7
pubmed: 15021777
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jul;37(6):647-53
pubmed: 27273407
Radiology. 1990 Feb;174(2):395-400
pubmed: 2404313
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Apr;116(4):424-7
pubmed: 2317323
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Oct;28(7):951-7
pubmed: 17728691
Laryngoscope. 2013 Aug;123(8):1957-66
pubmed: 23335152
HNO. 2017 Aug;65(Suppl 2):81-86
pubmed: 28116456
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Feb;122(2):143-8
pubmed: 8630207
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999 Jul;108(7 Pt 1):659-60
pubmed: 10435924
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 May;29(5):898-905
pubmed: 18321986
HNO. 2017 Aug;65(Suppl 2):136-148
pubmed: 28664238
J Laryngol Otol. 1994 Dec;108(12):1111-4
pubmed: 7861098
Laryngoscope. 2002 Jan;112(1):8-17
pubmed: 11802031
J Int Adv Otol. 2021 May;17(3):265-268
pubmed: 34100754
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan - Feb;85(1):111-120
pubmed: 29980446
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Aug 1;42(7):1014-1021
pubmed: 33710152
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jan;33(1):104-9
pubmed: 22158921
Arch Otolaryngol. 1972 Dec;96(6):573-5
pubmed: 4621046
HNO. 2017 Jan;65(Suppl 1):46-51
pubmed: 27590489