Translational Science, DNA Commercialization, and Informed Consent: The Need for Specific Terminology, Insights from a Review of H3Africa Projects.

Commercialization Typology DNA commercialization Ethics of genetic research H3Africa Informed consent

Journal

Public health genomics
ISSN: 1662-8063
Titre abrégé: Public Health Genomics
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101474167

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 17 06 2021
accepted: 24 11 2021
entrez: 25 1 2022
pubmed: 26 1 2022
medline: 26 1 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In the past decade, there has been an acceleration in genomic research, its applications, and its translation into healthcare products and services for the benefit of public health. These advances are critical to realizing the potential of genomic research for facilitating improved health and disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Despite its tremendous opportunities, the dynamic and increasingly global landscape of genomic research commercialization has been accompanied by a variety of ethical challenges and concerns. The potential for unauthorized use of DNA samples from African people to develop a DNA chip amplifies discussion on the meanings, implications, and impacts of commercialization, benefit sharing, and appropriate consent in genomic research. Leadership of the Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) Consortium convened a panel of experts to review research ethics practices employed in H3Africa Consortium projects and make recommendations regarding commercialization. Eighteen investigators submitted documents for projects involving data sharing and use of genetic information. A total of 39 informed consent documents associated with the 18 projects were reviewed. All 18 projects specified that samples would be used in future research. Less than half of the projects included language noting that samples could be used in drug or product development, that DNA samples would not be sold, and that profits would not be shared with participants. Four projects referred to commercialization. Analysis of information included in consent documents contributed to the development of a Commercialization Typology. The Typology identifies factors to consider regarding acceptability of particular instances of commercialization. DNA samples for translational research in product development require a transparent commercialization framework to inform the consent process.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35078200
pii: 000521371
doi: 10.1159/000521371
pmc: PMC9216313
doi:

Types de publication

News

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-8

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Références

AAS Open Res. 2018 Apr 18;1:13
pubmed: 30714023
Hum Genomics. 2014 Oct 22;8:18
pubmed: 25339190
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57
pubmed: 27724893
Account Res. 2011 May;18(3):121-31
pubmed: 21574069
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):71
pubmed: 31615491
Nat Genet. 2019 Nov;51(11):1566-1571
pubmed: 31659323
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jun 16;16:42
pubmed: 26077875
Science. 2019 Nov 1;366(6465):555-556
pubmed: 31672869
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7847):542
pubmed: 33597774
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2016 Aug 31;17:375-93
pubmed: 26905784
J Med Ethics. 2016 Feb;42(2):132-7
pubmed: 26644426
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 May 13;15:38
pubmed: 24885380
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Sep;21(9):897-902
pubmed: 23299918
J Law Biosci. 2014 Feb 25;1(1):94-110
pubmed: 27774156
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 22;17(1):64
pubmed: 27770794
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;162:79-87
pubmed: 27343817
Biopreserv Biobank. 2019 Dec;17(6):613-624
pubmed: 31603696
AAS Open Res. 2019 May 22;2:15
pubmed: 32259025
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Nov 12;4:171
pubmed: 32954012
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Sep 11;14:35
pubmed: 24025667
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jun 12;21(1):48
pubmed: 32532327
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 15;18(1):12
pubmed: 28202021
Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7752):290-293
pubmed: 30992587
Dev World Bioeth. 2009 Dec;9(3):138-48
pubmed: 18452553
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(2):272-82
pubmed: 17050056
Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2017 Sep 4;2:e13
pubmed: 29276620
Biopreserv Biobank. 2012 Feb;10(1):45-7
pubmed: 24849753
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195171
pubmed: 29621313
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Jul 02;13:15
pubmed: 22747883
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(4):220-8
pubmed: 27376949
Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Nov;42(6):14-20
pubmed: 33136331
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 2;18(1):8
pubmed: 28153006
Oncologist. 2020 Jul;25(7):620-626
pubmed: 32167617

Auteurs

Patricia Marshall (P)

Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Charmaine D M Royal (CDM)

African & African American Studies, Biology, Global Health, and Family Medicine & Community Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Ruth Chadwick (R)

School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH