Matrix stiffness mechanosensing modulates the expression and distribution of transcription factors in Schwann cells.

Schwann cell cell plasticity extracellular matrix stiffness mechanosensing nerve regeneration neuron

Journal

Bioengineering & translational medicine
ISSN: 2380-6761
Titre abrégé: Bioeng Transl Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101689146

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 19 07 2021
revised: 04 09 2021
accepted: 06 09 2021
entrez: 26 1 2022
pubmed: 27 1 2022
medline: 27 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

After peripheral nerve injury, mature Schwann cells (SCs) de-differentiate and undergo cell reprogramming to convert into a specialized cell repair phenotype that promotes nerve regeneration. Reprogramming of SCs into the repair phenotype is tightly controlled at the genome level and includes downregulation of pro-myelinating genes and activation of nerve repair-associated genes. Nerve injuries induce not only biochemical but also mechanical changes in the tissue architecture which impact SCs. Recently, we showed that SCs mechanically sense the stiffness of the extracellular matrix and that SC mechanosensitivity modulates their morphology and migratory behavior. Here, we explore the expression levels of key transcription factors and myelin-associated genes in SCs, and the outgrowth of primary dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurites, in response to changes in the stiffness of generated matrices. The selected stiffness range matches the physiological conditions of both utilized cell types as determined in our previous investigations. We find that stiffer matrices induce upregulation of the expression of transcription factors Sox2, Oct6, and Krox20, and concomitantly reduce the expression of the repair-associated transcription factor c-Jun, suggesting a link between SC substrate mechanosensing and gene expression regulation. Likewise, DRG neurite outgrowth correlates with substrate stiffness. The remarkable intrinsic physiological plasticity of SCs, and the mechanosensitivity of SCs and neurites, may be exploited in the design of bioengineered scaffolds that promote nerve regeneration upon injury.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35079632
doi: 10.1002/btm2.10257
pii: BTM210257
pmc: PMC8780053
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e10257

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jul;19(7):879-87
pubmed: 27273766
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 6;10(1):1984
pubmed: 32029747
Trends Neurosci. 1999 Sep;22(9):402-10
pubmed: 10441301
APL Bioeng. 2019 Sep 17;3(3):036107
pubmed: 31893255
Nature. 2011 Jun 08;474(7350):179-83
pubmed: 21654799
Nat Commun. 2017 Apr 26;8:15161
pubmed: 28443644
Elife. 2017 Jan 26;6:
pubmed: 28124973
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;38(12):1995-9
pubmed: 16807057
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Oct;16(5):501-7
pubmed: 16956757
Science. 1996 Jul 26;273(5274):507-10
pubmed: 8662541
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 May 08;7(7):a020487
pubmed: 25957303
Glia. 2019 Mar;67(3):421-437
pubmed: 30632639
Sci Rep. 2014 Dec 02;4:7286
pubmed: 25446378
Cells. 2020 Aug 06;9(8):
pubmed: 32781699
J Physiol. 2016 Jul 1;594(13):3521-31
pubmed: 26864683
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020 Oct;77(20):3977-3989
pubmed: 32277262
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Dec;15(12):802-12
pubmed: 25355505
Nanomedicine. 2017 Feb;13(2):493-501
pubmed: 27389149
J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 20;26(38):9771-9
pubmed: 16988048
Trends Neurosci. 2012 Feb;35(2):123-34
pubmed: 22192173
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Sep;6(9):671-82
pubmed: 16136171
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Jan;10(1):75-82
pubmed: 19197334
Prog Brain Res. 2017;231:107-133
pubmed: 28554394
Neuron. 2012 Aug 23;75(4):633-47
pubmed: 22920255
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;44(4):1263-1270
pubmed: 29183014
Trends Neurosci. 2005 Nov;28(11):583-8
pubmed: 16139372
Physiol Rev. 2014 Oct;94(4):1287-312
pubmed: 25287865

Auteurs

Gonzalo Rosso (G)

Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light Erlangen Germany.
Max-Planck-Zentrum für Physik und Medizin Erlangen Germany.
Institute of Physiology II, University of Münster Münster Germany.

Daniel Wehner (D)

Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light Erlangen Germany.
Max-Planck-Zentrum für Physik und Medizin Erlangen Germany.

Christine Schweitzer (C)

Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light Erlangen Germany.
Max-Planck-Zentrum für Physik und Medizin Erlangen Germany.

Stephanie Möllmert (S)

Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light Erlangen Germany.
Max-Planck-Zentrum für Physik und Medizin Erlangen Germany.

Elisabeth Sock (E)

Institute of Biochemistry, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany.

Jochen Guck (J)

Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light Erlangen Germany.
Max-Planck-Zentrum für Physik und Medizin Erlangen Germany.
Department of Physics FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany.

Victor Shahin (V)

Institute of Physiology II, University of Münster Münster Germany.

Classifications MeSH