Perspectives of Clinicians on Shared Decision Making in Pediatric CKD: A Qualitative Study.
Children
chronic kidney disease (CKD)
clinician
decisional conflict
end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
interview
patient autonomy
patient-centered care
patient-doctor relationship
pediatric
qualitative research
quality of life (QOL)
shared decision making
Journal
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation
ISSN: 1523-6838
Titre abrégé: Am J Kidney Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8110075
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
25
08
2021
accepted:
06
12
2021
pubmed:
28
1
2022
medline:
27
7
2022
entrez:
27
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinical decision-making priorities may differ among children, their parents, and their clinicians. This study describes clinicians' perspectives on shared decision making in pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD) and identifies opportunities to improve shared decision making and care for children with CKD and their families. Semistructured interviews. Fifty clinicians participated, including pediatric nephrologists, nurses, social workers, surgeons, dietitians, and psychologists involved in providing care to children with CKD. They worked at 18 hospitals and 4 university research departments across 11 countries (United States of America, Canada, Australia, People's Republic of China, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Lithuania, New Zealand, and Singapore). Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. We identified 4 themes: (1) striving to blend priorities (minimizing treatment burden, emphasizing clinical long-term risks, achieving common goals), (2) focusing on medical responsibilities (carrying decisional burden and pressure of expectations, working within system constraints, ensuring safety is foremost concern), (3) collaborating to achieve better long-term outcomes (individualizing care, creating partnerships, encouraging ownership and participation in shared decision making, sensitive to parental distress), and (4) forming cumulative knowledge (balancing reassurance and realistic expectations, building understanding around treatment, harnessing motivation for long-term goals). Most clinicians were from high-income countries, so the transferability of the findings to other settings is uncertain. Clinicians reported striving to minimize treatment burden and working with children and their families to manage their expectations and support their decision making. However, they are challenged with system constraints and sometimes felt the pressure of being responsible for the child's long-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to test whether support for shared decision making would promote strategies to establish and improve the quality of care for children with CKD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35085686
pii: S0272-6386(22)00033-6
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.12.009
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
241-250Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.