Stroke imaging prior to thrombectomy in the late window: results from a pooled multicentre analysis.
cerebrovascular
image analysis
interventional
stroke
Journal
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
ISSN: 1468-330X
Titre abrégé: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985191R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
04
09
2021
accepted:
30
12
2021
pubmed:
29
1
2022
medline:
15
4
2022
entrez:
28
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Collateral assessment using CT angiography is a promising modality for selecting patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the late window (6-24 hours). The outcome of these patients compared with those selected using perfusion imaging is not clear. We pooled data from seven trials and registries of EVT-treated patients in the late-time window. Patients were classified according to the baseline imaging into collateral imaging alone (collateral cohort) and perfusion plus collateral imaging (perfusion cohort). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving independent 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 'mRS' 0-2). We used the propensity score-weighting method to balance important predictors between the cohorts. In 608 patients, the median onset/last-known-well to emergency arrival time was 8.8 hours and 53.2% had wake-up strokes. Both cohorts had collateral imaging and 379 (62.3%) had perfusion imaging. Independent functional outcome was achieved in 43.1% overall: 168/379 patients (45.5%) in the perfusion cohort versus 94/214 (43.9%) in the collateral cohort (p=0.71). A logistic regression model adjusting for inverse-probability-weighting showed no difference in 90-day mRS score of 0-2 among the perfusion versus collateral cohorts (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.59, p=0.83) or in a favourable shift in 90-day mRS (common adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.47, p=0.97). This pooled analysis of late window EVT showed comparable functional outcomes in patients selected for EVT using collateral imaging alone compared with patients selected using perfusion and collateral imaging. CRD42020222003.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Collateral assessment using CT angiography is a promising modality for selecting patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the late window (6-24 hours). The outcome of these patients compared with those selected using perfusion imaging is not clear.
METHODS
We pooled data from seven trials and registries of EVT-treated patients in the late-time window. Patients were classified according to the baseline imaging into collateral imaging alone (collateral cohort) and perfusion plus collateral imaging (perfusion cohort). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving independent 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 'mRS' 0-2). We used the propensity score-weighting method to balance important predictors between the cohorts.
RESULTS
In 608 patients, the median onset/last-known-well to emergency arrival time was 8.8 hours and 53.2% had wake-up strokes. Both cohorts had collateral imaging and 379 (62.3%) had perfusion imaging. Independent functional outcome was achieved in 43.1% overall: 168/379 patients (45.5%) in the perfusion cohort versus 94/214 (43.9%) in the collateral cohort (p=0.71). A logistic regression model adjusting for inverse-probability-weighting showed no difference in 90-day mRS score of 0-2 among the perfusion versus collateral cohorts (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.59, p=0.83) or in a favourable shift in 90-day mRS (common adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.47, p=0.97).
CONCLUSION
This pooled analysis of late window EVT showed comparable functional outcomes in patients selected for EVT using collateral imaging alone compared with patients selected using perfusion and collateral imaging.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020222003.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35086938
pii: jnnp-2021-327959
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-327959
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
468-474Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MAA reports being a member of the scientific advisory board of Palmera Medical. AD reports personal fees from Medtronic. MG reports grants or personal fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Microvention, Cerenovus, and has a patent Systems of Acute Stroke Diagnosis issued to GE Healthcare. MDH has received grant support from Medtronic, consultant fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and speaker’s fees from Amgen. SM acted as a consultant for Cerenovus. BKM reports shares in Circle NVI; patent for systems of triage in acute stroke. Dr Patrik reports research grants from the Swiss Heart Foundation and the Swiss National Science Foundation. DT received honoraria as a member of advisory board of Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Pfizer-BMS, Medtronic and Daiichi Sankyo. The other authors report no conflicts.