Choice of home blood pressure monitoring device: the role of device characteristics among Alaska Native and American Indian peoples.
Alaskan Natives
Algorithms
Blood Pressure
/ physiology
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
/ instrumentation
Cross-Over Studies
Female
Humans
Hypertension
/ diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Compliance
Pilot Projects
Reproducibility of Results
United States
/ epidemiology
American Indian or Alaska Native
Alaska Native
American Indian
Blood pressure
Home blood pressure monitoring
Preferences
Journal
BMC cardiovascular disorders
ISSN: 1471-2261
Titre abrégé: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 01 2022
28 01 2022
Historique:
received:
17
08
2021
accepted:
28
12
2021
entrez:
29
1
2022
pubmed:
30
1
2022
medline:
1
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is an effective tool in treatment and long-term management of hypertension. HBPM incorporates more data points to help patients and providers with diagnosis and management. The characteristics of HBPM devices matter to patients, but the relative importance of the characteristics in choosing a device remains unclear. We used data from a randomized cross-over pilot study with 100 Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) people with hypertension to assess the choice of a wrist or arm HBPM device. We use a random utility framework to evaluate the relationship between stated likely use, perceived accuracy, ease of use, comfort, and participant characteristics with choice of device. Additional analyses examined willingness to change to a more accurate device. Participants ranked the wrist device higher compared to the arm on a 5-point Likert scale for likely use, ease of use, and comfort (0.3, 0.5, 0.8 percentage points, respectively). Most participants (66%) choose the wrist device. Likely use (wrist and arm devices) was related to the probability of choosing the wrist (0.7 and - 1.4 percentage points, respectively). Independent of characteristics, 75% of participants would be willing to use the more accurate device. Ease of use (wrist device) and comfort (arm device) were associated with the probability of changing to a more accurate device (- 1.1 and 0.5 percentage points, respectively). Usability, including comfort, ease, and likely use, appeared to discount the relative importance of perceived accuracy in the device choice. Our results contribute evidence that ANAI populations value accurate HBPM, but that the devices should also be easy to use and comfortable to facilitate long-term management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is an effective tool in treatment and long-term management of hypertension. HBPM incorporates more data points to help patients and providers with diagnosis and management. The characteristics of HBPM devices matter to patients, but the relative importance of the characteristics in choosing a device remains unclear.
METHODS
We used data from a randomized cross-over pilot study with 100 Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) people with hypertension to assess the choice of a wrist or arm HBPM device. We use a random utility framework to evaluate the relationship between stated likely use, perceived accuracy, ease of use, comfort, and participant characteristics with choice of device. Additional analyses examined willingness to change to a more accurate device.
RESULTS
Participants ranked the wrist device higher compared to the arm on a 5-point Likert scale for likely use, ease of use, and comfort (0.3, 0.5, 0.8 percentage points, respectively). Most participants (66%) choose the wrist device. Likely use (wrist and arm devices) was related to the probability of choosing the wrist (0.7 and - 1.4 percentage points, respectively). Independent of characteristics, 75% of participants would be willing to use the more accurate device. Ease of use (wrist device) and comfort (arm device) were associated with the probability of changing to a more accurate device (- 1.1 and 0.5 percentage points, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Usability, including comfort, ease, and likely use, appeared to discount the relative importance of perceived accuracy in the device choice. Our results contribute evidence that ANAI populations value accurate HBPM, but that the devices should also be easy to use and comfortable to facilitate long-term management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35090399
doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02449-w
pii: 10.1186/s12872-021-02449-w
pmc: PMC8796453
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19Subventions
Organisme : NIMHD NIH HHS
ID : U54 MD011240
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902
pubmed: 25005924
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(14):907-28
pubmed: 15362928
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jul;20(7):1116-1121
pubmed: 30003694
Ann Behav Med. 2003 Winter;25(1):1-7
pubmed: 12581930
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e80973
pubmed: 24454685
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Sep 09;16:119
pubmed: 26354752
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jan 27;10:99-106
pubmed: 26869773
Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Aug;34(6):506-17
pubmed: 25189522
Eur Cardiol. 2015 Dec;10(2):95-101
pubmed: 30310433
Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug;45(4):1024-40
pubmed: 20528990
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 31;13(8):e0203264
pubmed: 30169525
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(37):e1475
pubmed: 26376388
Health Econ. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 1:35-52
pubmed: 21809412
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 25;20(4):e111
pubmed: 29695375
J Aging Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;33(7-8_suppl):40S-50S
pubmed: 34167348
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226
pubmed: 30392040
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 30;9(7):e029486
pubmed: 31366657
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jul;7(4):A85
pubmed: 20550843
Respir Med. 2014 Jul;108(7):968-75
pubmed: 24873873
Health Econ. 2017 Feb;26 Suppl 1:109-123
pubmed: 28139090
Health Econ. 2005 Jul;14(7):687-701
pubmed: 15619273
Health Educ Q. 1988 Summer;15(2):175-83
pubmed: 3378902
Am J Prev Med. 2018 May;54(5):699-703
pubmed: 29551327
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Feb;21(2):159-168
pubmed: 30570200
Health Econ. 2004 Dec;13(12):1167-80
pubmed: 15386672
JMIR Cardio. 2019 Mar 26;3(1):e11951
pubmed: 31758771
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Mar;9(2):339-41
pubmed: 25385947
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar;3(2):188-95
pubmed: 20179265
Can J Cardiol. 2017 May;33(5):586-590
pubmed: 28449830
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr;100(4):677-83
pubmed: 20220114
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Aug 10;1:31
pubmed: 31304313
J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Apr-Jun;31(2):128-41
pubmed: 18360174
JAMA. 2018 Nov 6;320(17):1753-1754
pubmed: 30398609
Hypertension. 2019 May;73(5):e35-e66
pubmed: 30827125
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Feb;24(1):64-70
pubmed: 10777981
J Hypertens. 2019 Feb;37(2):264-279
pubmed: 30020240
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 2;144(9):665-72
pubmed: 16670136
J Health Econ. 2008 Jul;27(4):1078-1094
pubmed: 18179837
BMJ. 2012 Jul 09;345:e3953
pubmed: 22777025
J Hum Hypertens. 2014 Apr;28(4):224-9
pubmed: 24152822
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jun;69(683):e389-e397
pubmed: 30910876
J Hypertens. 2002 Apr;20(4):629-38
pubmed: 11910297
PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 19;14(9):e1002389
pubmed: 28926573
Health Econ. 2007 Nov;16(11):1185-204
pubmed: 17304501
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(4):e5641
pubmed: 28121920
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Aug;66(649):e577-86
pubmed: 27266860
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;82(2):522-31
pubmed: 27074550
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2013 Aug 05;72:
pubmed: 23984269
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2018 Sep 1;11(5):249-256
pubmed: 30230518
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1269-1324
pubmed: 29133354