Impact of expert pathology review in skin adnexal carcinoma diagnosis: Analysis of 2573 patients from the French CARADERM network.

To prospectively assess the impact of expert pathological review of skin adnexal carcinoma diagnosis in France. From 2014 to 2019, 2573 samples from patients with newly diagnosed or suspected skin adnexal carcinomas were reviewed prospectively by expert pathologists through the national CARADERM (CAncers RAres DERMatologiques) network. Changes in diagnosis between referral and expert review were analysed regarding their potential impact on patient care or prognosis. The samples comprised 2205 newly diagnosed adnexal carcinomas, 129 benign adnexal tumours, 136 basal cell carcinomas, 74 squamous cell carcinomas, six cutaneous metastases and 13 other malignancies. There were 930 (42%) sweat gland carcinomas, of which porocarcinoma (261; 11.8%), microcystic adnexal carcinoma (125; 5.7%) and hidradenocarcinoma (109; 4.9%) were the most frequent subtypes; 778 (35%) hair follicle carcinomas, 238 (11%) sebaceous carcinomas and 212 (10%) extramammary Paget diseases/mammary-like anogenital gland adenocarcinomas. A diagnostic change between referral and expert review occurred in 503 (21.3%) patients, significantly higher for cases sent with a provisional diagnosis seeking an expert second opinion (45.7%) than for cases sent with a formal diagnosis (2.8%) (p < .0001). Sweat gland carcinomas were more prone to diagnostic discrepancies than other tumours (p < .0001), including 1.8% of patients with sweat gland carcinoma subtype misclassification with predicted clinical impact. Changes between benign and malignant conditions occurred in 117 samples (5% of patients). The study provides a unique description of the distribution of skin adnexal carcinomas and highlights the importance of expert review for these rare cancers. Optimal clinical management was impacted in a significant proportion of patients.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.