COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths in Belgian nursing homes: results of a surveillance conducted between April and December 2020.
Belgium
COVID-19
Epidemiology
Nursing homes
Surveillance
Journal
Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique
ISSN: 0778-7367
Titre abrégé: Arch Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9208826
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jan 2022
29 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
18
10
2021
accepted:
07
01
2022
entrez:
30
1
2022
pubmed:
31
1
2022
medline:
31
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In Belgium, the first COVID-19 death was reported on 10 March 2020. Nursing home (NH) residents are particularly vulnerable for COVID-19, making it essential to follow-up the spread of COVID-19 in this setting. This manuscript describes the methodology of surveillance and epidemiology of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths in Belgian NHs. A COVID-19 surveillance in all Belgian NHs (n = 1542) was set up by the regional health authorities and Sciensano. Aggregated data on possible/confirmed COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations and case-based data on deaths were reported by NHs at least once a week. The study period covered April-December 2020. Weekly incidence/prevalence data were calculated per 1000 residents or staff members. This surveillance has been launched within 14 days after the first COVID-19 death in Belgium. Automatic data cleaning was installed using different validation rules. More than 99% of NHs participated at least once, with a median weekly participation rate of 95%. The cumulative incidence of possible/confirmed COVID-19 cases among residents was 206/1000 in the first wave and 367/1000 in the second wave. Most NHs (82%) reported cases in both waves and 74% registered ≥10 possible/confirmed cases among residents at one point in time. In 51% of NHs, at least 10% of staff was absent due to COVID-19 at one point. Between 11 March 2020 and 3 January 2021, 11,329 COVID-19 deaths among NH residents were reported, comprising 57% of all COVID-19 deaths in Belgium in that period. This surveillance was crucial in mapping COVID-19 in this vulnerable setting and guiding public health interventions, despite limitations of aggregated data and necessary changes in protocol over time. Belgian NHs were severely hit by COVID-19 with many fatal cases. The measure of not allowing visitors, implemented in the beginning of the pandemic, could not avoid the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the NHs during the first wave. The virus was probably often introduced by staff. Once the virus was introduced, it was difficult to prevent healthcare-associated outbreaks. Although, in contrast to the first wave, personal protective equipment was available in the second wave, again a high number of cases were reported.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In Belgium, the first COVID-19 death was reported on 10 March 2020. Nursing home (NH) residents are particularly vulnerable for COVID-19, making it essential to follow-up the spread of COVID-19 in this setting. This manuscript describes the methodology of surveillance and epidemiology of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths in Belgian NHs.
METHODS
METHODS
A COVID-19 surveillance in all Belgian NHs (n = 1542) was set up by the regional health authorities and Sciensano. Aggregated data on possible/confirmed COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations and case-based data on deaths were reported by NHs at least once a week. The study period covered April-December 2020. Weekly incidence/prevalence data were calculated per 1000 residents or staff members.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This surveillance has been launched within 14 days after the first COVID-19 death in Belgium. Automatic data cleaning was installed using different validation rules. More than 99% of NHs participated at least once, with a median weekly participation rate of 95%. The cumulative incidence of possible/confirmed COVID-19 cases among residents was 206/1000 in the first wave and 367/1000 in the second wave. Most NHs (82%) reported cases in both waves and 74% registered ≥10 possible/confirmed cases among residents at one point in time. In 51% of NHs, at least 10% of staff was absent due to COVID-19 at one point. Between 11 March 2020 and 3 January 2021, 11,329 COVID-19 deaths among NH residents were reported, comprising 57% of all COVID-19 deaths in Belgium in that period.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This surveillance was crucial in mapping COVID-19 in this vulnerable setting and guiding public health interventions, despite limitations of aggregated data and necessary changes in protocol over time. Belgian NHs were severely hit by COVID-19 with many fatal cases. The measure of not allowing visitors, implemented in the beginning of the pandemic, could not avoid the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the NHs during the first wave. The virus was probably often introduced by staff. Once the virus was introduced, it was difficult to prevent healthcare-associated outbreaks. Although, in contrast to the first wave, personal protective equipment was available in the second wave, again a high number of cases were reported.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35093169
doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00794-6
pii: 10.1186/s13690-022-00794-6
pmc: PMC8799977
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
45Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Age Ageing. 2010 May;39(3):299-305
pubmed: 20332371
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jun;25(22):
pubmed: 32524949
Euro Surveill. 2020 Mar;25(9):
pubmed: 32156327
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2005-2011
pubmed: 32220208
Arch Public Health. 2020 Nov 18;78(1):121
pubmed: 33292566
Euro Surveill. 2021 Dec;26(48):
pubmed: 34857066
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1775-1776
pubmed: 32203977
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 6;50(6):1804-1813
pubmed: 34999883
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):934-943
pubmed: 32167524
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):e67
pubmed: 32628906
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):260-262
pubmed: 33476568
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261
pubmed: 32512579
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 15;70(2):52-55
pubmed: 33444301