Immobilization of β-Galactosidase by Encapsulation of Enzyme-Conjugated Polymer Nanoparticles Inside Hydrogel Microparticles.

PEG-diacrylate affinity binding biofunctionalization enzyme activity microfluidics photopolymerization

Journal

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology
ISSN: 2296-4185
Titre abrégé: Front Bioeng Biotechnol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101632513

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 18 11 2021
accepted: 23 12 2021
entrez: 31 1 2022
pubmed: 1 2 2022
medline: 1 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Increasing the shelf life of enzymes and making them reusable is a prominent topic in biotechnology. The encapsulation inside hydrogel microparticles (HMPs) can enhance the enzyme's stability by preserving its native conformation and facilitating continuous biocatalytic processes and enzyme recovery. In this study, we present a method to immobilize β-galactosidase by, first, conjugating the enzyme onto the surface of polymer nanoparticles, and then encapsulating these enzyme-conjugated nanoparticles (ENPs) inside HMPs using microfluidic device paired with UV-LEDs. Polymer nanoparticles act as anchors for enzyme molecules, potentially preventing their leaching through the hydrogel network especially during swelling. The affinity binding (through streptavidin-biotin interaction) was used as an immobilization technique of β-galactosidase on the surface of polymer nanoparticles. The hydrogel microparticles of roughly 400 μm in size (swollen state) containing unbound enzyme and ENPs were produced. The effects of encapsulation and storage in different conditions were evaluated. It was discovered that the encapsulation in acrylamide (AcAm) microparticles caused an almost complete loss of enzymatic activity. Encapsulation in poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-diacrylate microparticles, on the other hand, showed a residual activity of 15-25%, presumably due to a protective effect of PEG during polymerization. One of the major factors that affected the enzyme activity was presence of photoinitiator exposed to UV-irradiation. Storage studies were carried out at room temperature, in the fridge and in the freezer throughout 1, 7 and 28 days. The polymer nanoparticles showcased excellent immobilization properties and preserved the activity of the conjugated enzyme at room temperature (115% residual activity after 28 days), while a slight decrease was observed for the unbound enzyme (94% after 28 days). Similar trends were observed for encapsulated ENPs and unbound enzyme. Nevertheless, storage at -26°C resulted in an almost complete loss of enzymatic activity for all samples.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35096800
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.818053
pii: 818053
pmc: PMC8793669
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

818053

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Suvarli, Wenger, Serra, Perner-Nochta, Hubbuch and Wörner.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Polymers (Basel). 2021 Dec 13;13(24):
pubmed: 34960913
Chemistry. 2019 Oct 16;:
pubmed: 31618489
Food Chem. 2016 Jun 1;200:69-75
pubmed: 26830562
Methods Enzymol. 2020;630:81-110
pubmed: 31932000
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Feb 1;122:594-602
pubmed: 30404027
Langmuir. 2007 Jul 3;23(14):7745-50
pubmed: 17530868
Biomacromolecules. 2012 Aug 13;13(8):2456-64
pubmed: 22724592
Int J Pharm. 1999 Aug 20;185(2):129-88
pubmed: 10460913
3 Biotech. 2013 Feb;3(1):1-9
pubmed: 28324347
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018 May 4;57(19):5539-5543
pubmed: 29466613
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61(16):2659-2690
pubmed: 32590905
Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015 Mar 4;29(2):205-220
pubmed: 26019635
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001 Nov;57(4):474-81
pubmed: 11762591
Carbohydr Polym. 2015 Jan 22;115:223-9
pubmed: 25439889
Int J Biochem. 1994 Feb;26(2):229-33
pubmed: 8174757
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015 Mar;175(6):2961-71
pubmed: 25578158
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2011 Aug 10;49(3):260-5
pubmed: 22112509
Adv Mater. 2018 Aug;30(35):e1801541
pubmed: 29989671
Biomaterials. 2002 Sep;23(17):3627-36
pubmed: 12109688
J Nanobiotechnology. 2005 Jan 20;3(1):1
pubmed: 15661076
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003 Aug;14(4):444-50
pubmed: 12943856
Anal Biochem. 1979 Apr 1;94(1):75-81
pubmed: 37780
Methods Enzymol. 1976;44:397-443
pubmed: 15187
Materials (Basel). 2019 Nov 27;12(23):
pubmed: 31783523
FEBS Lett. 1989 Oct 23;257(1):171-3
pubmed: 2806559
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Jul 21;8:713
pubmed: 32850688
Indian J Exp Biol. 2013 Oct;51(10):777-88
pubmed: 24266101
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000 Dec 15;384(2):398-406
pubmed: 11368330
Nature. 2001 Jan 11;409(6817):258-68
pubmed: 11196655

Auteurs

Narmin Suvarli (N)

Biomoleular Separation Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.

Lukas Wenger (L)

Biomoleular Separation Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.

Christophe Serra (C)

Chimie Macromoléculaire de Précision, Institute Charles Sadron, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Iris Perner-Nochta (I)

Biomoleular Separation Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.

Jürgen Hubbuch (J)

Biomoleular Separation Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.

Michael Wörner (M)

Biomoleular Separation Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.

Classifications MeSH