Assessment of Various Measurement Methods to Assess First Metatarsal Elevation in Hallux Rigidus.

arthritis first metatarsal elevation first metatarsophalangeal arthritis hallux disorders hallux rigidus measurement metatarsus primus elevatus

Journal

Foot & ankle orthopaedics
ISSN: 2473-0114
Titre abrégé: Foot Ankle Orthop
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101752333

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
entrez: 31 1 2022
pubmed: 17 9 2019
medline: 17 9 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

While metatarsus primus elevatus (MPE) has been implicated in the development of hallux rigidus, previous studies have presented conflicting findings regarding the relationship between MPE and arthritis. This may be due to the variety of definitions for MPE and the radiographic measurement techniques that are used to assess it. Additionally, previous studies have only assessed elevation of the first metatarsal with respect to the floor or the second metatarsal, and not with respect to the proximal phalanx. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of new radiographic measurements that consider the elevation of the first metatarsal in relation to the proximal phalanx, rather than in relation to the second metatarsal as previously described, to assess for MPE. In addition, we aimed to determine whether the elevation of the first metatarsal was significantly different in patients with hallux rigidus than in a control population. A retrospective chart review was conducted from prospectively collected registry data at the investigators' institution to identify patients with hallux rigidus ( Six of the 7 radiographic measurements were found to have substantial to almost perfect interrater reliability (ICC, 0.800-0.953) between all levels of training, except for the proximal phalanx-first metatarsal angle, which showed moderate reliability (ICC, 0.527). Substantial to almost perfect intrarater reliability (ICC, 0.710-0.982) was demonstrated by the measurements performed by research assistants. All 7 of the measurements taken by the musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologist demonstrated significant differences in first metatarsal elevation between the hallux rigidus and control populations, with the hallux rigidus group showing increased elevation ( This study confirmed the reliability of 7 radiographic measurements used to assess for MPE, including 3 previously established and 4 newly described measurements. Observers across all levels of training were able to demonstrate reliable measurements. In addition, the measurements were used to show that patients with hallux rigidus were more likely to have MPE compared with patients without radiographic evidence for first MTP arthritis. These measurements could be used in future work to examine how the presence of MPE relates to the etiology and progression of hallux rigidus, and how it affects the results of operative treatment. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
While metatarsus primus elevatus (MPE) has been implicated in the development of hallux rigidus, previous studies have presented conflicting findings regarding the relationship between MPE and arthritis. This may be due to the variety of definitions for MPE and the radiographic measurement techniques that are used to assess it. Additionally, previous studies have only assessed elevation of the first metatarsal with respect to the floor or the second metatarsal, and not with respect to the proximal phalanx. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of new radiographic measurements that consider the elevation of the first metatarsal in relation to the proximal phalanx, rather than in relation to the second metatarsal as previously described, to assess for MPE. In addition, we aimed to determine whether the elevation of the first metatarsal was significantly different in patients with hallux rigidus than in a control population.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective chart review was conducted from prospectively collected registry data at the investigators' institution to identify patients with hallux rigidus (
RESULTS RESULTS
Six of the 7 radiographic measurements were found to have substantial to almost perfect interrater reliability (ICC, 0.800-0.953) between all levels of training, except for the proximal phalanx-first metatarsal angle, which showed moderate reliability (ICC, 0.527). Substantial to almost perfect intrarater reliability (ICC, 0.710-0.982) was demonstrated by the measurements performed by research assistants. All 7 of the measurements taken by the musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologist demonstrated significant differences in first metatarsal elevation between the hallux rigidus and control populations, with the hallux rigidus group showing increased elevation (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study confirmed the reliability of 7 radiographic measurements used to assess for MPE, including 3 previously established and 4 newly described measurements. Observers across all levels of training were able to demonstrate reliable measurements. In addition, the measurements were used to show that patients with hallux rigidus were more likely to have MPE compared with patients without radiographic evidence for first MTP arthritis. These measurements could be used in future work to examine how the presence of MPE relates to the etiology and progression of hallux rigidus, and how it affects the results of operative treatment.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE METHODS
Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35097341
doi: 10.1177/2473011419875686
pii: 10.1177_2473011419875686
pmc: PMC8696814
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2473011419875686

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. ICMJE forms for all authors are available online.

Références

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Sep;25(9):648-653
pubmed: 28837457
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1994 Nov;84(11):548-63
pubmed: 7807384
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950 May;32-B(2):214-22
pubmed: 15422020
Malawi Med J. 2012 Sep;24(3):69-71
pubmed: 23638278
Instr Course Lect. 1990;39:15-21
pubmed: 2186096
Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Dec;20(12):777-80
pubmed: 10609705
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978 Feb;60(1):82-7
pubmed: 627584
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1952 Aug;34-B(3):366-85
pubmed: 12999918
Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Oct;24(10):731-43
pubmed: 14587987
Foot Ankle Clin. 2015 Sep;20(3):381-9
pubmed: 26320553
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Aug;32(8):782-8
pubmed: 22049864
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Nov;85(11):2072-88
pubmed: 14630834
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Jul;29(7):677-82
pubmed: 18785417
Proc R Soc Med. 1938 Sep;31(11):1273
pubmed: 19991663
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Sep;31(9):807-14
pubmed: 20880485
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005 May-Jun;95(3):221-8
pubmed: 15901807

Auteurs

Mackenzie T Jones (MT)

Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Austin E Sanders (AE)

Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Rachael J DaCunha (RJ)

Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Elizabeth A Cody (EA)

Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Carolyn M Sofka (CM)

Department of Radiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Joseph Nguyen (J)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Jonathan T Deland (JT)

Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Scott J Ellis (SJ)

Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH