Contribution of First-Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion to Deformity Correction in the Treatment of Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity.

NCIA first-tarsometatarsal fusion flatfoot deformity midfoot collapse naviculocuneiform posterior tibial tendon dysfunction subtalar fusion

Journal

Foot & ankle orthopaedics
ISSN: 2473-0114
Titre abrégé: Foot Ankle Orthop
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101752333

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez: 31 1 2022
pubmed: 20 8 2020
medline: 20 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Severe adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is often associated with painful medial column collapse at the naviculocuneiform (NC) joint. However, many surgeons surgically correct the deformity without directly addressing this joint. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of first-tarsometatarsal (TMT) fusion combined with subtalar fusion in correcting deformity at the NC joint. We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients (41 feet) who underwent first-TMT and subtalar (ST) fusion as part of a flatfoot reconstructive procedure. We assessed 6 radiographic parameters both preoperatively and at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively, including talonavicular (TN) coverage angle, lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, hindfoot moment arm, and a newly defined navicular-cuneiform incongruency angle (NCIA). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 1-year follow-up. The NCIA demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability, with no significant change between pre- and postoperative measurements. All other radiographic parameters, except calcaneal pitch, demonstrated statistically significant improvement postoperatively ( Our data suggest that when addressing painful collapse of the medial arch in patients with AAFD, fusion of the first-TMT joint in combination with other procedures leads to acceptable radiographic and clinical outcomes. There was no change in deformity at the NC joint in our patient cohort at short-term follow-up, and patients achieved significant improvement in multiple PROMIS domains. Although TMT fusion had no effect on NC deformity, residual or worsening NC deformity did not significantly affect clinical outcomes. In addition, the NCIA was found to be a reliable radiographic parameter to assess NC deformity in the presence of talonavicular and/or first-TMT fusion. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Severe adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is often associated with painful medial column collapse at the naviculocuneiform (NC) joint. However, many surgeons surgically correct the deformity without directly addressing this joint. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of first-tarsometatarsal (TMT) fusion combined with subtalar fusion in correcting deformity at the NC joint.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients (41 feet) who underwent first-TMT and subtalar (ST) fusion as part of a flatfoot reconstructive procedure. We assessed 6 radiographic parameters both preoperatively and at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively, including talonavicular (TN) coverage angle, lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, hindfoot moment arm, and a newly defined navicular-cuneiform incongruency angle (NCIA). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS RESULTS
The NCIA demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability, with no significant change between pre- and postoperative measurements. All other radiographic parameters, except calcaneal pitch, demonstrated statistically significant improvement postoperatively (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our data suggest that when addressing painful collapse of the medial arch in patients with AAFD, fusion of the first-TMT joint in combination with other procedures leads to acceptable radiographic and clinical outcomes. There was no change in deformity at the NC joint in our patient cohort at short-term follow-up, and patients achieved significant improvement in multiple PROMIS domains. Although TMT fusion had no effect on NC deformity, residual or worsening NC deformity did not significantly affect clinical outcomes. In addition, the NCIA was found to be a reliable radiographic parameter to assess NC deformity in the presence of talonavicular and/or first-TMT fusion.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE METHODS
Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35097383
doi: 10.1177/2473011420927321
pii: 10.1177_2473011420927321
pmc: PMC8564927
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2473011420927321

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. ICMJE forms for all authors are available online.

Références

Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Nov;26(11):913-7
pubmed: 16309603
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Jul;39(7):763-770
pubmed: 29620940
Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:393-405
pubmed: 9143981
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Aug;38(8):870-878
pubmed: 28602138
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Sep;35(9):847-54
pubmed: 25161151
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Jul-Aug;(177):140-7
pubmed: 6861387
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jan;40(1):65-73
pubmed: 30282469
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Oct 16;101(20):1838-1844
pubmed: 31626008
Foot Ankle Int. 1997 Sep;18(9):603-4
pubmed: 9310775
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Jan;76(1):133-6
pubmed: 8300657
Foot Ankle Int. 1995 Sep;16(9):572-6
pubmed: 8563927
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1665-76
pubmed: 8934480
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Jun;26(6):427-35
pubmed: 15960907
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Sep;78(9):1376-85
pubmed: 8816654
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Mar;35(3):232-7
pubmed: 24357679
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008 Jul;16(7):399-406
pubmed: 18611997
Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Jun;33(6):498-500
pubmed: 22735323
Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Dec;15(12):661-5
pubmed: 7894638
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3466-74
pubmed: 23749433
Foot Ankle Clin. 2012 Jun;17(2):337-49
pubmed: 22541530
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 May;37(5):508-13
pubmed: 26666677
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Mar;28(3):295-7
pubmed: 17371651
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Dec;6(4):294-303
pubmed: 23765382
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Foot Ankle Clin. 2017 Sep;22(3):529-544
pubmed: 28779805
Orthop Clin North Am. 2020 Jan;51(1):109-120
pubmed: 31739874
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2004 Jan;21(1):141-56
pubmed: 15012037
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Sep;37(9):911-8
pubmed: 27530986
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Mar-Apr;50(2):176-81
pubmed: 21354002
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jan;40(1):42-47
pubmed: 30317867

Auteurs

Jonathan Day (J)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Matthew S Conti (MS)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Nicholas Williams (N)

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Scott J Ellis (SJ)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Jonathan T Deland (JT)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Elizabeth A Cody (EA)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH