Evaluation of Multiplex/Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction and Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Malaria Diagnosis in Southeastern Iran.
Cross-Sectional Studies
Humans
Iran
/ epidemiology
Malaria
/ diagnosis
Malaria, Falciparum
/ diagnosis
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
/ methods
Plasmodium falciparum
/ genetics
Plasmodium vivax
/ genetics
Polymerase Chain Reaction
/ methods
Sensitivity and Specificity
Journal
The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene
ISSN: 1476-1645
Titre abrégé: Am J Trop Med Hyg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370507
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 01 2022
31 01 2022
Historique:
received:
09
09
2021
accepted:
15
10
2021
pubmed:
1
2
2022
medline:
26
4
2022
entrez:
31
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Malaria is one of the most serious health problems in many countries, including Iran. Accurate diagnosis is important regardless of the elimination status of a country. A cross-sectional study was performed on 105 people who were suspected to be positive for malaria infection in Sistan and Baluchistan, Iran. Blood smears (thin and thick films) were stained with 10% Giemsa. DNA was extracted from the prepared thin and thick films for molecular methods. Multiplex/nested polymerase chain reaction (mn-PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and light microscopy (LM) were compared with nested PCR (nPCR) as a gold standard. Of 105 subjects, 52 (49.5%), 58 (55.2%), 58 (55.2%), and 63 (60%) were positive for malaria by LM, nPCR, mn-PCR, and LAMP, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and kappa were 92.1%, 100%, and 0.9 for LAMP and 100%, 100%, and 1 for mn-PCR, respectively. Eight cases of coinfection (Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum) that were not detected by LM method were diagnosed by mn-PCR and LAMP. In the present study, the high sensitivity and specificity of LAMP and mn-PCR indicate that these two tests are good alternatives to nPCR for malaria diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35100562
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0970
pmc: PMC8922511
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
841-845Références
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Oct;85(4):594-6
pubmed: 21976556
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Mar;42(3):1214-9
pubmed: 15004078
Malar J. 2015 Jan 28;14:43
pubmed: 25627037
Infect Genet Evol. 2018 Nov;65:283-287
pubmed: 30096462
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 May;52(5):1471-7
pubmed: 24574279
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jan;38(1):345-50
pubmed: 10618113
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jun 15;28(12):E63
pubmed: 10871386
J Infect Dis. 2013 Aug 15;208(4):645-52
pubmed: 23633405
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 6;12(2):e0171126
pubmed: 28166235
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Jul;73(1):191-8
pubmed: 16014857
Microb Pathog. 2019 Dec;137:103782
pubmed: 31600540
Malar J. 2017 Jan 19;16(1):34
pubmed: 28103883
Malar J. 2014 Feb 06;13:48
pubmed: 24502664
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Nov;77(5):972-6
pubmed: 17984362
J Vector Borne Dis. 2019 Apr-Jun;56(2):170-173
pubmed: 31397394
Malar J. 2006 Dec 14;5:121
pubmed: 17169142
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Jul;83(1):56-60
pubmed: 20595478
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Aug;45(8):2521-8
pubmed: 17567794
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016;58:27
pubmed: 27074321
Malar J. 2015 Jan 28;14:44
pubmed: 25626339
Malar J. 2012 Jun 10;11:190
pubmed: 22682065
J Infect Dis. 2014 Oct 15;210(8):1180-7
pubmed: 24795480
J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2006 Dec;36(3):737-48
pubmed: 17153692
Parasitol Int. 2007 Mar;56(1):61-4
pubmed: 17257891
Parasit Vectors. 2011 Jun 21;4:115
pubmed: 21693031
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002 Jan;15(1):66-78
pubmed: 11781267