Real-world indoor mobility with simulated prosthetic vision: The benefits and feasibility of contour-based scene simplification at different phosphene resolutions.
Journal
Journal of vision
ISSN: 1534-7362
Titre abrégé: J Vis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101147197
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2022
01 02 2022
Historique:
entrez:
1
2
2022
pubmed:
2
2
2022
medline:
16
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Neuroprosthetic implants are a promising technology for restoring some form of vision in people with visual impairments via electrical neurostimulation in the visual pathway. Although an artificially generated prosthetic percept is relatively limited compared with normal vision, it may provide some elementary perception of the surroundings, re-enabling daily living functionality. For mobility in particular, various studies have investigated the benefits of visual neuroprosthetics in a simulated prosthetic vision paradigm with varying outcomes. The previous literature suggests that scene simplification via image processing, and particularly contour extraction, may potentially improve the mobility performance in a virtual environment. In the current simulation study with sighted participants, we explore both the theoretically attainable benefits of strict scene simplification in an indoor environment by controlling the environmental complexity, as well as the practically achieved improvement with a deep learning-based surface boundary detection implementation compared with traditional edge detection. A simulated electrode resolution of 26 × 26 was found to provide sufficient information for mobility in a simple environment. Our results suggest that, for a lower number of implanted electrodes, the removal of background textures and within-surface gradients may be beneficial in theory. However, the deep learning-based implementation for surface boundary detection did not improve mobility performance in the current study. Furthermore, our findings indicate that, for a greater number of electrodes, the removal of within-surface gradients and background textures may deteriorate, rather than improve, mobility. Therefore, finding a balanced amount of scene simplification requires a careful tradeoff between informativity and interpretability that may depend on the number of implanted electrodes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35103758
pii: 2778332
doi: 10.1167/jov.22.2.1
pmc: PMC8819280
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1Références
Brain Res. 2015 Jan 21;1595:51-73
pubmed: 25446438
Artif Organs. 2003 Nov;27(11):1005-15
pubmed: 14616519
Front Neurosci. 2020 Aug 11;14:681
pubmed: 32848535
J Physiol. 1968 May;196(2):479-93
pubmed: 4871047
Vision Res. 1996 Sep;36(18):2815-26
pubmed: 8917785
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Oct 29;7(5):29
pubmed: 30386681
J Neural Eng. 2012 Dec;9(6):065003
pubmed: 23186948
Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2377-2384
pubmed: 23850093
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982 May;59(5):413-26
pubmed: 7102800
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Oct;90(10):1119-27
pubmed: 24067408
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:5283-6
pubmed: 24110928
Int J Neural Syst. 2020 Sep;30(9):2050045
pubmed: 32689842
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Sep;3(9):329-336
pubmed: 10461195
Proc (IEEE Int Conf Multimed Expo). 2013;2013:1-6
pubmed: 25302090
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7670-5
pubmed: 17452646
Science. 2020 Dec 4;370(6521):1191-1196
pubmed: 33273097
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Feb;4(2):213-6
pubmed: 11175884
J Neural Eng. 2011 Aug;8(4):046016
pubmed: 21673395
Artif Organs. 2017 Sep;41(9):852-861
pubmed: 28321887
Trends Biotechnol. 2013 Oct;31(10):562-71
pubmed: 23953722
J Neural Eng. 2007 Mar;4(1):S92-101
pubmed: 17325421
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:4457-60
pubmed: 22255328
J Neural Eng. 2018 Apr;15(2):021005
pubmed: 29350199
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Jun;37(5):803-18
pubmed: 23535445
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0227677
pubmed: 31995568
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1986 Jun;8(6):679-98
pubmed: 21869365
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2018 Mar 14;2018:3198342
pubmed: 29731769
Vision Res. 2011 Jan;51(1):179-86
pubmed: 21093469
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272
pubmed: 32015543
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;255(3):435-447
pubmed: 28091782
J Vis. 2010 Dec 29;10(14):
pubmed: 21191130
J Neural Eng. 2015 Feb;12(1):016003
pubmed: 25427135
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990 May;28(3):257-9
pubmed: 2377008
J Neural Eng. 2013 Apr;10(2):026017
pubmed: 23449023
Brain. 1996 Apr;119 ( Pt 2):507-22
pubmed: 8800945
J Neural Eng. 2009 Jun;6(3):035008
pubmed: 19458397
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Sep;86(9):654-9
pubmed: 27301783
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:2585-8
pubmed: 25570519
J Neural Eng. 2016 Apr;13(2):026022
pubmed: 26902525
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jul;22(7):598-610
pubmed: 29729902
Qual Life Res. 2012 Oct;21(8):1405-11
pubmed: 22090173
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014 Oct-Dec;9(4):494-505
pubmed: 25709777
Vision Res. 1992 Jul;32(7):1367-72
pubmed: 1455709
Science. 1974 Feb 1;183(4123):440-4
pubmed: 4808973
Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:347-75
pubmed: 19660667