No evidence for auditory N1 dishabituation in healthy adults after presentation of rare novel distractors.
Auditory evoked potentials
Dishabituation
Habituation
N1 refractoriness
Orienting response
P3
Stimulus novelty
Stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA)
Journal
International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
ISSN: 1872-7697
Titre abrégé: Int J Psychophysiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406214
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
05
07
2021
revised:
24
01
2022
accepted:
26
01
2022
pubmed:
2
2
2022
medline:
29
4
2022
entrez:
1
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Previous studies were not able to show that presentation of change stimuli leads to dishabituation of the auditory evoked potential (AEP) component N1 for repeated stimuli. However, these change stimuli were usually themselves repeatedly presented. Here, we tested whether the presentation of non-repeating distractor stimuli ('novels') would lead to N1 dishabituation. The study sample consisted of 18 healthy participants who had to identify auditory target stimuli (´targets´) among repeated standard stimuli and rare novels. AEPs to standards were separately averaged, depending on the preceding stimulus (standards after standards, standards after targets, and standards after novels) and were compared by F statistics and Bayesian t-test. Moreover, N1 repetition effects within recording blocks were analyzed in single trial analyses. The analyses showed that targets elicited significantly larger N1 amplitudes than standards and standards elicited larger N1 amplitudes than novels. In contrast, the N1 amplitude to standards did not vary with the preceding stimulus. The single trial analyses revealed significant, but similar N1 amplitude decreases within the recording blocks for all standards. The current study revealed no evidence for N1 dishabituation, as the N1 amplitude for standards after novels was not increased as compared to the N1 for standards after standards. Thus, stimulus variation had no impact on the N1 of repeated standards, as also suggested by the single trial analyses. The lack of N1 dishabituation is at odds with the assumption that the N1 amplitude decrease after repeated stimulation results from habituation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35104580
pii: S0167-8760(22)00021-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.01.013
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-8Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.