The WID-BC-index identifies women with primary poor prognostic breast cancer based on DNA methylation in cervical samples.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2022
01 02 2022
Historique:
received:
20
05
2021
accepted:
02
12
2021
entrez:
2
2
2022
pubmed:
3
2
2022
medline:
15
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Genetic and non-genetic factors contribute to breast cancer development. An epigenome-based signature capturing these components in easily accessible samples could identify women at risk. Here, we analyse the DNA methylome in 2,818 cervical, 357 and 227 matched buccal and blood samples respectively, and 42 breast tissue samples from women with and without breast cancer. Utilising cervical liquid-based cytology samples, we develop the DNA methylation-based Women's risk IDentification for Breast Cancer index (WID-BC-index) that identifies women with breast cancer with an AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) in internal and external validation sets, respectively. CpGs at progesterone receptor binding sites hypomethylated in normal breast tissue of women with breast cancer or in BRCA mutation carriers are also hypomethylated in cervical samples of women with poor prognostic breast cancer. Our data indicate that a systemic epigenetic programming defect is highly prevalent in women who develop breast cancer. Further studies validating the WID-BC-index may enable clinical implementation for monitoring breast cancer risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35105882
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27918-w
pii: 10.1038/s41467-021-27918-w
pmc: PMC8807602
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
449Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Harbeck, N. & Gnant, M. Breast cancer. Lancet 389, 1134–1150 (2017).
pubmed: 27865536
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31891-8
Warner, E. Clinical practice. Breast-cancer screening. N. Engl. J. Med 365, 1025–1032 (2011).
pubmed: 21916640
doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1101540
Shen, S. Y. et al. Sensitive tumour detection and classification using plasma cell-free DNA methylomes. Nature 563, 579–583 (2018).
pubmed: 30429608
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0703-0
Widschwendter, M. et al. Methylation patterns in serum DNA for early identification of disseminated breast cancer. Genome Med 9, 115 (2017).
pubmed: 29268762
pmcid: 5740791
doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0499-9
Autier, P. & Boniol, M. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine. Eur. J. Cancer 90, 34–62 (2018).
pubmed: 29272783
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.002
Gail, M. H. & Pfeiffer, R. M. Breast Cancer Risk Model Requirements for Counseling, Prevention, and Screening. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 110, 994–1002 (2018).
pubmed: 29490057
pmcid: 6136930
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy013
Pal Choudhury, P. et al. Comparative Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models and Projections for Future Risk Stratification. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 112, 278–285 (2020).
pubmed: 31165158
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz113
Cohen, P. A., Jhingran, A., Oaknin, A. & Denny, L. Cervical cancer. Lancet 393, 169–182 (2019).
pubmed: 30638582
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X
Teschendorff, A. E. et al. DNA methylation outliers in normal breast tissue identify field defects that are enriched in cancer. Nat. Commun. 7, 10478 (2016).
pubmed: 26823093
pmcid: 4740178
doi: 10.1038/ncomms10478
Lichtenstein, P. et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer-analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N. Engl. J. Med 343, 78–85 (2000).
pubmed: 10891514
doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430201
Ambatipudi, S. et al. DNA methylome analysis identifies accelerated epigenetic ageing associated with postmenopausal breast cancer susceptibility. Eur. J. Cancer 75, 299–307 (2017).
pubmed: 28259012
pmcid: 5512160
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.014
Anjum, S. et al. A BRCA1-mutation associated DNA methylation signature in blood cells predicts sporadic breast cancer incidence and survival. Genome Med 6, 47 (2014).
pubmed: 25067956
pmcid: 4110671
doi: 10.1186/gm567
Severi, G. et al. Epigenome-wide methylation in DNA from peripheral blood as a marker of risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 148, 665–673 (2014).
pubmed: 25407397
doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3209-y
van Veldhoven, K. et al. Epigenome-wide association study reveals decreased average methylation levels years before breast cancer diagnosis. Clin. Epigenetics 7, 67 (2015).
pubmed: 26244061
pmcid: 4524428
doi: 10.1186/s13148-015-0104-2
Xu, Z. et al. Epigenome-wide association study of breast cancer using prospectively collected sister study samples. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 105, 694–700 (2013).
pubmed: 23578854
pmcid: 3653821
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt045
Brennan, K. et al. Intragenic ATM methylation in peripheral blood DNA as a biomarker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Res 72, 2304–2313 (2012).
pubmed: 22374981
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3157
Chlebowski, R. T. et al. Association of Menopausal Hormone Therapy With Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality During Long-term Follow-up of the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA 324, 369–380 (2020).
pubmed: 32721007
pmcid: 7388026
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9482
Widschwendter, M. et al. The sex hormone system in carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: a case-control study. Lancet Oncol. 14, 1226–1232 (2013).
pubmed: 24140203
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70448-0
Schramek, D. et al. Osteoclast differentiation factor RANKL controls development of progestin-driven mammary cancer. Nature 468, 98–102 (2010).
pubmed: 20881962
pmcid: 3084017
doi: 10.1038/nature09387
Hosseini, H. et al. Early dissemination seeds metastasis in breast cancer. Nature 540, 552–558 (2016).
pubmed: 27974799
pmcid: 5390864
doi: 10.1038/nature20785
Gonzalez-Suarez, E. et al. RANK ligand mediates progestin-induced mammary epithelial proliferation and carcinogenesis. Nature 468, 103–107 (2010).
pubmed: 20881963
doi: 10.1038/nature09495
Joshi, P. A. et al. Progesterone induces adult mammary stem cell expansion. Nature 465, 803–807 (2010).
pubmed: 20445538
doi: 10.1038/nature09091
Poole, A. J. et al. Prevention of Brca1-mediated mammary tumorigenesis in mice by a progesterone antagonist. Science 314, 1467–1470 (2006).
pubmed: 17138902
doi: 10.1126/science.1130471
Widschwendter, M. et al. Epigenome-based cancer risk prediction: rationale, opportunities and challenges. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 292–309 (2018).
pubmed: 29485132
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.30
Pidsley, R. et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 17, 208 (2016).
pubmed: 27717381
pmcid: 5055731
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1
Zheng, S. C. et al. A novel cell-type deconvolution algorithm reveals substantial contamination by immune cells in saliva, buccal and cervix. Epigenomics 10, 925–940 (2018).
pubmed: 29693419
doi: 10.2217/epi-2018-0037
Kuchenbaecker, K. B. et al. Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. JAMA 317, 2402–2416 (2017).
pubmed: 28632866
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112
Feinberg, A. P., Koldobskiy, M. A. & Gondor, A. Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression. Nat. Rev. Genet 17, 284–299 (2016).
pubmed: 26972587
pmcid: 4888057
doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.13
Salhab, A. et al. A comprehensive analysis of 195 DNA methylomes reveals shared and cell-specific features of partially methylated domains. Genome Biol. 19, 150 (2018).
pubmed: 30266094
pmcid: 6161375
doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1510-5
Mellemkjaer, L. et al. Risk of primary non-breast cancer after female breast cancer by age at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 20, 1784–1792 (2011).
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0009
Mavaddat, N. et al. Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes. Am. J. Hum. Genet 104, 21–34 (2019).
pubmed: 30554720
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.002
Ho, P. J. et al. DNA methylation and breast cancer-associated variants. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 188, 713–727 (2021).
pubmed: 33768416
doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06185-9
Lacasa, D., Le Liepvre, X., Ferre, P. & Dugail, I. Progesterone stimulates adipocyte determination and differentiation 1/sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c gene expression. potential mechanism for the lipogenic effect of progesterone in adipose tissue. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 11512–11516 (2001).
pubmed: 11278421
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008556200
Esslimani-Sahla, M. et al. Increased expression of fatty acid synthase and progesterone receptor in early steps of human mammary carcinogenesis. Int J. Cancer 120, 224–229 (2007).
pubmed: 17044016
doi: 10.1002/ijc.22202
Argov-Argaman, N., Raz, C. & Roth, Z. Progesterone Regulation of Milk Fat Globule Size Is VLDL Dependent. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 11, 596 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00596
Mohammed, H. et al. Progesterone receptor modulates ERalpha action in breast cancer. Nature 523, 313–317 (2015).
pubmed: 26153859
pmcid: 4650274
doi: 10.1038/nature14583
Yin, P. et al. Genome-wide progesterone receptor binding: cell type-specific and shared mechanisms in T47D breast cancer cells and primary leiomyoma cells. PLoS ONE 7, e29021 (2012).
pubmed: 22272226
pmcid: 3260146
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029021
Widschwendter, M. & Dubeau, L. Non-Surgical Cancer Risk Reduction in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers: Disabling the Remote Control. Cancers (Basel) 12, 547 (2020).
Kresovich, J. K. et al. Prediagnostic Immune Cell Profiles and Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 3, e1919536 (2020).
pubmed: 31951276
pmcid: 6991268
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19536
Haggie, J. A., Sellwood, R. A., Howell, A., Birch, J. M. & Schor, S. L. Fibroblasts from relatives of patients with hereditary breast cancer show fetal-like behaviour in vitro. Lancet 1, 1455–1457 (1987).
pubmed: 2885452
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)92206-9
Levine, M. E. et al. Menopause accelerates biological aging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9327–9332 (2016).
pubmed: 27457926
pmcid: 4995944
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604558113
Perskvist, N., Bjorklund, C. & Dillner, J. A complex intervention for workflow enhancement at the Swedish cervical cytology biobank. Biopreserv Biobank 12, 69–73 (2014).
pubmed: 24620772
doi: 10.1089/bio.2013.0068
Perskvist, N., Norman, I., Eklund, C., Litton, J. E. & Dillner, J. The Swedish cervical cytology biobank: sample handling and storage process. Biopreserv Biobank 11, 19–24 (2013).
pubmed: 24845251
doi: 10.1089/bio.2012.0036
Zhou, W., Laird, P. W. & Shen, H. Comprehensive characterization, annotation and innovative use of Infinium DNA methylation BeadChip probes. Nucleic Acids Res 45, e22 (2017).
pubmed: 27924034
Van Calster, B. et al. Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med 17, 230 (2019).
pubmed: 31842878
pmcid: 6912996
doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7
Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet 81, 559–575 (2007).
pubmed: 17701901
pmcid: 1950838
doi: 10.1086/519795
Manichaikul, A. et al. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26, 2867–2873 (2010).
pubmed: 20926424
pmcid: 3025716
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq559
Das, S. et al. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat. Genet 48, 1284–1287 (2016).
pubmed: 27571263
pmcid: 5157836
doi: 10.1038/ng.3656
Michailidou, K. et al. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci. Nature 551, 92–94 (2017).
pubmed: 29059683
pmcid: 5798588
doi: 10.1038/nature24284
Herzog. C., B. J., Widschwendter M. The WID-BC-index identifies women with primary poor prognostic breast cancer based on DNA methylation in cervical samples. Nat. Commun 7, 10478 (2021).