Music to
Brain network
Culture
FMRI
Flexibility
Modularity
Music
Journal
IBRO neuroscience reports
ISSN: 2667-2421
Titre abrégé: IBRO Neurosci Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101775148
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
18
08
2021
accepted:
28
12
2021
entrez:
2
2
2022
pubmed:
3
2
2022
medline:
3
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Music listening involves many simultaneous neural operations, including auditory processing, working memory, temporal sequencing, pitch tracking, anticipation, reward, and emotion, and thus, a full investigation of music cognition would benefit from whole-brain analyses. Here, we quantify whole-brain activity while participants listen to a variety of music and speech auditory pieces using two network measures that are grounded in complex systems theory: modularity, which measures the degree to which brain regions are interacting in communities, and flexibility, which measures the rate that brain regions switch the communities to which they belong. In a music and brain connectivity study that is part of a larger clinical investigation into music listening and stroke recovery at Houston Methodist Hospital's Center for Performing Arts Medicine, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed on healthy participants while they listened to self-selected music to which they felt a positive emotional attachment, as well as culturally familiar music (J.S. Bach), culturally unfamiliar music (Gagaku court music of medieval Japan), and several excerpts of speech. There was a marked contrast among the whole-brain networks during the different types of auditory pieces, in particular for the unfamiliar music. During the self-selected and Bach tracks, participants' whole-brain networks exhibited modular organization that was significantly coordinated with the network flexibility. Meanwhile, when the Gagaku music was played, this relationship between brain network modularity and flexibility largely disappeared. In addition, while the auditory cortex's flexibility during the self-selected piece was equivalent to that during Bach, it was more flexible during Gagaku. The results suggest that the modularity and flexibility measures of whole-brain activity have the potential to lead to new insights into the complex neural function that occurs during music perception of real-world songs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35106517
doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2021.12.007
pii: S2667-2421(21)00056-7
pmc: PMC8784322
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
98-107Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 2;30(22):7604-12
pubmed: 20519535
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jul;30(7):1033-1046
pubmed: 29561235
Prog Brain Res. 2009;178:67-77
pubmed: 19874962
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Mar;29(3):312-28
pubmed: 17497646
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140096
pubmed: 25646519
Phys Biol. 2015 Jan 26;12(1):016009
pubmed: 25619207
PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5183
pubmed: 19365552
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Aug 24;11:420
pubmed: 28883789
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140088
pubmed: 25646511
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):653-67
pubmed: 22811369
Brain Connect. 2016 Jul 27;6(8):632-641
pubmed: 27464741
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jan;16(1):48-55
pubmed: 15660851
Dev Psychol. 2010 Jan;46(1):286-92
pubmed: 20053025
Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 11;3:327
pubmed: 22973254
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Apr;15(4):703-713
pubmed: 31655968
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):282-91
pubmed: 20035018
Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Nov;224(8):2839-2855
pubmed: 31440906
Neuron. 2006 Apr 20;50(2):329-39
pubmed: 16630842
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 3;108(18):7641-6
pubmed: 21502525
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:112-7
pubmed: 14681123
Science. 2019 Nov 22;366(6468):
pubmed: 31753969
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1415-1428
pubmed: 26833316
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8577-82
pubmed: 16723398
Cogn Sci. 2017 Mar;41 Suppl 2:303-320
pubmed: 27665745
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:184-8
pubmed: 14681138
Music Percept. 2009 Dec 1;27(2):81-88
pubmed: 20657798
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:613-40
pubmed: 26393868
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 09;6:366
pubmed: 26029122
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 18;110 Suppl 2:10430-7
pubmed: 23754373
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Mar;27(3):239-50
pubmed: 16078183
J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 25;29(47):14980-6
pubmed: 19940193
Neuron. 2015 Dec 16;88(6):1281-1296
pubmed: 26687225
Nature. 2016 Jul 28;535(7613):547-50
pubmed: 27409816
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):743-7
pubmed: 21889996
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):688-91
pubmed: 12830160
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 30;102(35):12639-43
pubmed: 16105946
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Sep;29(9):1532-1546
pubmed: 28471728
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27241
pubmed: 22110619
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:360-78
pubmed: 23707587
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov;11(11):466-72
pubmed: 17981074