Novel approach for treating challenging implant-borne maxillary dental rehabilitation cases of cleft lip and palate: a retrospective study.
3D-technology
CAD/CAM
Cleft lip and palate
Dental implants
IPS-preprosthetic®
Implant-borne dental rehabilitation
Selective laser melting
Journal
International journal of implant dentistry
ISSN: 2198-4034
Titre abrégé: Int J Implant Dent
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101676532
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 02 2022
02 02 2022
Historique:
received:
06
10
2021
accepted:
11
01
2022
entrez:
2
2
2022
pubmed:
3
2
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dental restoration in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients is demanding and often results in bone loss and dental implant failure. Furthermore, unfavorable conditions of hard and soft tissues as well as skeletal deformities aggravate surgical and dental treatment. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the feasibility of using a new type of patient-specific implant (IPS-preprosthetic®) in CLP patients. Of the 63 patients who received a IPS-preprosthetic® implant in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Hannover Medical School, Germany, six patients were treated for a CLP deformity with significant soft and hard tissue impairment. Two patients were partially edentulous, whereas four patients were edentulous for the maxilla. All implants were inserted in a single-step outpatient surgery and were followed up for up to 40 months. Within the observation period, no implant failed and no screw loosening or change in stability of the implant to recipient site occurred (mean number of screws: 21). This study demonstrates, for the first time, the efficient use of a one-piece multivector screw primarily retained a stable patient-specific implant for implant-borne prosthodontic rehabilitation of CLP patients with deformities and challenging initial situations. IPS-preprosthetic® implants offer a novel approach to implant dentistry treatment protocols, especially in difficult cases of unusual anatomy, even when previous conventional treatment fails.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35106688
doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00401-x
pii: 10.1186/s40729-022-00401-x
pmc: PMC8807737
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Feb;13(1):44-52
pubmed: 12005144
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Feb;143(2):359e-367e
pubmed: 30531628
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Aug;49(8):1067-1072
pubmed: 31992467
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Oct;15(5):598-606
pubmed: 15355403
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Oct;45(10):1632-1638
pubmed: 28867525
Head Face Med. 2017 Sep 29;13(1):17
pubmed: 28962664
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Apr 1;45(2):140-145
pubmed: 33951166
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Aug;26(4):260-265
pubmed: 29746304
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999;10(2):225-39
pubmed: 10759424
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Oct;34(7):715-21
pubmed: 16157247
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Nov 28;24:8608-8620
pubmed: 30484438
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jul;49(7):952-959
pubmed: 32098700
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Aug;92(2):136-41
pubmed: 11505258
Int J Dent. 2013;2013:506968
pubmed: 23737790
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Aug;20(8):809-16
pubmed: 19604280
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Sep;49(5):601-8
pubmed: 21740181
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Aug;46(8):993-999
pubmed: 28396130
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Aug;70(2):135-40
pubmed: 8371176