Medical students' adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship - cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching.

Undergraduate medical education blended learning clerkship general practice online teaching

Journal

Medical education online
ISSN: 1087-2981
Titre abrégé: Med Educ Online
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9806550

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
entrez: 2 2 2022
pubmed: 3 2 2022
medline: 5 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the University of Leipzig completely switched to online teaching. Thus, we developed a practice-oriented digital substitute for a two-week mandatory general practice (GP) clerkship. Main components were processing of clinical cases and additional GP topics, visual diagnoses, information and examination videos, and regular remote exchanges with associated GP teachers. We took the chance to comprehensively evaluate the new teaching formats (acceptance, use, working enjoyment, learning gain, practical relevance, insights into general practice) and to compare evaluations with two previous semesters to gain insights for future blended learning concepts. Cross-sectional post-hoc online evaluation among fourth year (of six) medical students participating in the digital mandatory 2-week GP clerkship during summer semester 2020; additional cohort comparison with two previous semesters (face-to-face clerkship). Out of 192 participants in the digital clerkship, 99 completed our questionnaire (response rate = 51.6%). Results were compared with 277 previous evaluations (face-to-face semesters). Most participants reported having enjoyed the online-based clerkship (87.9%), having learned a lot (89.9%), having gained insights into general practice (76.8%), and perceived high practical relevance (90.9%). Implementing the new teaching formats into future face-to-face clerkships was welcomed by 65.6%. Clinical cases, visual diagnoses, examination videos and communication with GP teachers were rated best regarding working enjoyment, learning gain, practical relevance and insights into a GP's work. Cohort comparison revealed somewhat better evaluations regarding knowledge transfer for the digital clerkship while imparting of skills and attitudes was reportedly worse. Students welcomed the digital content and perceived relevant learning gain. Our results may help to develop future blended learning concepts. Clinical cases, examination videos and visual diagnoses appear to be particularly suitable as useful online complements which could enrich face-to-face teaching. As students especially valued the exclusive time for exchanges with their preceptor, this should be facilitated in face-to-face clerkships.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the University of Leipzig completely switched to online teaching. Thus, we developed a practice-oriented digital substitute for a two-week mandatory general practice (GP) clerkship. Main components were processing of clinical cases and additional GP topics, visual diagnoses, information and examination videos, and regular remote exchanges with associated GP teachers. We took the chance to comprehensively evaluate the new teaching formats (acceptance, use, working enjoyment, learning gain, practical relevance, insights into general practice) and to compare evaluations with two previous semesters to gain insights for future blended learning concepts.
METHODS METHODS
Cross-sectional post-hoc online evaluation among fourth year (of six) medical students participating in the digital mandatory 2-week GP clerkship during summer semester 2020; additional cohort comparison with two previous semesters (face-to-face clerkship).
RESULTS RESULTS
Out of 192 participants in the digital clerkship, 99 completed our questionnaire (response rate = 51.6%). Results were compared with 277 previous evaluations (face-to-face semesters). Most participants reported having enjoyed the online-based clerkship (87.9%), having learned a lot (89.9%), having gained insights into general practice (76.8%), and perceived high practical relevance (90.9%). Implementing the new teaching formats into future face-to-face clerkships was welcomed by 65.6%. Clinical cases, visual diagnoses, examination videos and communication with GP teachers were rated best regarding working enjoyment, learning gain, practical relevance and insights into a GP's work. Cohort comparison revealed somewhat better evaluations regarding knowledge transfer for the digital clerkship while imparting of skills and attitudes was reportedly worse.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Students welcomed the digital content and perceived relevant learning gain. Our results may help to develop future blended learning concepts. Clinical cases, examination videos and visual diagnoses appear to be particularly suitable as useful online complements which could enrich face-to-face teaching. As students especially valued the exclusive time for exchanges with their preceptor, this should be facilitated in face-to-face clerkships.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35107417
doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2028334
pmc: PMC8812779
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2028334

Références

Fam Med. 2006 Oct;38(9):647-52
pubmed: 17009189
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1795-1796
pubmed: 31438348
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):341
pubmed: 33008392
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1666538
pubmed: 31526248
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1940765
pubmed: 34128776
Teach Learn Med. 2005 Winter;17(1):74-9
pubmed: 15691818
Adv Physiol Educ. 2019 Sep 1;43(3):408-413
pubmed: 31408381
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):376
pubmed: 31623637
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 10;22(8):e16504
pubmed: 32773378
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e042378
pubmed: 33154063
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Nov 15;36(6):Doc71
pubmed: 31844643
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Apr 19;16:43
pubmed: 27094813
Int J STEM Educ. 2017;4(1):34
pubmed: 30631690
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 09;21(1):78-84
pubmed: 31913823
Maedica (Bucur). 2020 Dec;15(4):440-444
pubmed: 33603900
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64
pubmed: 26447007
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Sep 30;9(3):e25
pubmed: 17942387
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 27;21(8):e12967
pubmed: 31456579
Korean J Med Educ. 2020 Sep;32(3):175-183
pubmed: 32894921
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):149-155
pubmed: 33088735
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 May 16;36(3):Doc28
pubmed: 31211223
BMC Med Educ. 2015 May 21;15:91
pubmed: 25994310
Nurse Pract. 2016 Feb 18;41(2):29-36
pubmed: 26795838
Fam Med. 1999 Mar;31(3):171-6
pubmed: 10086252
Ger Med Sci. 2009 Apr 02;7:Doc02
pubmed: 19675742
Acta Clin Belg. 2020 Apr;75(2):116-122
pubmed: 30618351
Technol Soc. 2020 Nov;63:101397
pubmed: 32921849
Med Teach. 2009 Jan;31(1):e6-12
pubmed: 19253150
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 03;37(7):Doc82
pubmed: 33364361
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 8;21(1):149
pubmed: 33685442
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jan-Feb;37(1):217-222
pubmed: 33437280
Fam Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;30(10):720-6
pubmed: 9827343
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):182-188
pubmed: 33337939

Auteurs

Marina Fehl (M)

Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Vera Gehres (V)

Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Anne-Kathrin Geier (AK)

Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Thomas Mundt (T)

Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Kay Klinge (K)

Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Thomas Frese (T)

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.

Markus Bleckwenn (M)

Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Tobias Deutsch (T)

Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH