Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy, safety, and satisfaction between ablative and non-ablative lasers in facial and hand rejuvenation/resurfacing.
Ablative
Laser
Non-ablative
Skin rejuvenation
Skin resurfacing
Systematic review
Journal
Lasers in medical science
ISSN: 1435-604X
Titre abrégé: Lasers Med Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
22
11
2021
accepted:
27
01
2022
pubmed:
3
2
2022
medline:
1
6
2022
entrez:
2
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Skin aging inevitably begins from the very early days of life. The lasers used in skin rejuvenation are mainly of two types: ablative and non-ablative. This meta-analysis aimed at comparing ablative with non-ablative lasers in terms of their efficacy and safety in skin rejuvenation. Articles published by March 15, 2020 in Embase, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane, and clinicalTrials.gov were searched. The inclusion criteria included randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) in English using ablative and non-ablative lasers and comparing their safety and efficiency in wrinkle improvement and photoaging therapy. Out of 1353 extracted articles, 11 were selected for qualitative synthesis and of these, 4 were quantitatively analyzed. Different modes of various lasers were implemented; the ablative lasers included Erbium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Er:YAG) and CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 35107665
doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03516-0
pii: 10.1007/s10103-022-03516-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Erbium
77B218D3YE
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2111-2122Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Yaar M, Gilchrest BA (2007) Photoageing: mechanism, prevention and therapy. Br J Dermatol 157:874–887
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08108.x
Gilchrest BA (2013) Photoaging. J Investig Dermatol 133:E2
doi: 10.1038/skinbio.2013.176
Battie C, Jitsukawa S, Bernerd F, Del Bino S, Marionnet C, Verschoore M (2014) New insights in photoaging, UVA induced damage and skin types. Exp Dermatol 23:7–12
doi: 10.1111/exd.12388
Sieber DA, Kenkel JM (2018) Noninvasive methods for lower facial rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 45:571–584
doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2018.06.003
Hamilton M, Campbell A, Holcomb JD (2018) Contemporary laser and light-based rejuvenation techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 26:113–121
doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2017.12.002
Johnson DL, Paletta F (2016) Skin resurfacing procedures of the upper face. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 24:117–124
doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2016.05.010
Weiss RA, McDaniel DH, Geronemus RG (2003) Review of nonablative photorejuvenation: reversal of the aging effects of the sun and environmental damage using laser and light sources. Semin Cutan Med Surgery 22:93–106
doi: 10.1053/sder.2003.50008
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700
doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC, Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928
DerSimonian R, Laird N (2015) Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials 45:139–145
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002
Cochran WG (1950) The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika 37:256–266
doi: 10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.256
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634
doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Sterne JAC, Egger M (2001) Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:1046–1055
doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8
Karsai S, Czarnecka A, Jünger M, Raulin C (2010) Ablative fractional lasers (CO(2) and Er:YAG): A randomized controlled double-blind split-face trial of the treatment of peri-orbital rhytides. Lasers Surg Med 42:160–167
doi: 10.1002/lsm.20879
Lee YB, Shin JY, Cheon MS, Oh ST, Cho BK, Park HJ (2012) Photorejuvenation using long-pulsed alexandrite and long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers: A pilot study of clinical outcome and patients’ satisfaction in Koreans. J Dermatol 39:425–429
doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01465.x
Somoano B, Hantash BM, Fincher EF, Wu P, Gladstone HB (2011) The erbium micropeel: A prospective, randomized trial of the effects of two fluence settings on facial photoaging. J Drugs Dermatol 10:179–185
pubmed: 21283923
Luo YJ, Xu XG, Wu Y, Xu TH, Chen JZS, Gao XH, Chen HD, Li YH (2012) Split-face comparison of ultrapulse-mode and superpulse-mode fractionated carbon dioxide lasers on photoaged skin. J Drugs Dermatol 11:1310–1314
pubmed: 23135080
Wattanakrai P, Pootongkam S, Rojhirunsakool S (2012) Periorbital rejuvenation with fractional 1,550-nm ytterbium/erbium fiber laser and variable square pulse 2,940-nm erbium:YAG laser in Asians: a comparison study. Dermatol Surg 38:610–622
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02298.x
El-Domyati M, Abd-El-Raheem T, Abdel-Wahab H, Medhat W, Hosam W, El-Fakahany H, Anwer MA (2013) Fractional versus ablative erbium:yttrium-Aluminum-garnet laser resurfacing for facial rejuvenation: An objective evaluation. J Am Acad Dermatol 68:103–112
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.09.014
Moon HR, Yun WJ, Lee YJ, Lee MW, Chang S (2015) A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of an ablative fractional 2940-nm erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser with a nonablative fractional 1550-nm erbium-doped glass laser for the treatment of photoaged Asian skin. J Dermatol Treat 26:551–557
doi: 10.3109/09546634.2014.999020
Robati RM, Asadi E (2017) Efficacy and safety of fractional CO
doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2111-8
Dadkhahfar S, Fadakar K, Robati RM (2019) Efficacy and safety of long pulse Nd:YAG laser versus fractional erbium:YAG laser in the treatment of facial skin wrinkles. Lasers Med Sci 34:457–464
doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2614-6
Yim S, Lee YH, Choi YJ, Kim WS (2020) Split-face comparison of the picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser using a microlens array and the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging facial wrinkles and pores in Asians. Lasers Med Sci 35:949–956
doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02906-1
Robati RM, Asadi E, Shafiee A, Namazi N, Talebi A (2018) Efficacy of long pulse Nd:YAG laser versus fractional Er:YAG laser in the treatment of hand wrinkles. Lasers Med Sci 33:461–467
doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2351-2
Seirafianpour F, Sodagar S, Mozafarpoor S, Baradaran HR, Panahi P, Hassanlouei B, Goodarzi A (2021) Systematic review of single and combined treatments for different types of striae: A comparison of striae treatments. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 35:2185–2198
doi: 10.1111/jdv.17374
Goodarzi A, Behrangi E, Ghassemi M, Nobari NN, Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan A, Roohaninasab M (2020) Acne scar; a review of classification and treatment. J Crit Rev 7:1108–1114
Golnaz M, Mahrokh F, Azadeh G, Forghani SF, Rohaninasab M, Ghassemi SS, Behrangi E (2019) Comparison of the therapeutic effect of microneedling with carbon dioxide laser in hypertrophic burn scars: a randomized clinical trial. Iranian J Dermatol 22:53–57
Behrangi E, Goodarzi A, Roohaninasab M, Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan A, Nobari NN, Ghassemi M (2020) A review of scar treatment related to acne and burn. J Crit Rev 7:714–722