Road-based line distance surveys overestimate densities of olive baboons.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
29
08
2021
accepted:
14
01
2022
entrez:
2
2
2022
pubmed:
3
2
2022
medline:
26
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Estimating population density and population dynamics is essential for understanding primate ecology and relies on robust methods. While distance sampling theory provides a robust framework for estimating animal abundance, implementing a constrained, non-systematic transect design could bias density estimates. Here, we assessed potential bias associated with line distance sampling surveys along roads based on a case study with olive baboons (Papio anubis) in Lake Manyara National Park (Tanzania). This was achieved by comparing density estimates of olive baboons derived from road transect surveys with density estimates derived from estimating the maximum number of social groups (via sleeping site counts) and multiplying this metric with the estimated average size of social groups. From 2011 to 2019, we counted olive baboons along road transects, estimated survey-specific densities in a distance sampling framework, and assessed temporal population trends. Based on the fitted half-normal detection function, the mean density was 132.5 baboons km-2 (95% CI: 110.4-159.2), however, detection models did not fit well due to heaping of sightings on and near the transects. Density estimates were associated with relatively wide confidence intervals that were mostly caused by encounter rate variance. Based on a generalized additive model, baboon densities were greater during the rainy seasons compared to the dry seasons but did not show marked annual trends. Compared to estimates derived from the alternative method (sleeping site survey), distance sampling along road transects overestimated the abundance of baboons more than threefold. Possibly, this overestimation was caused by the preferred use of roads by baboons. While being a frequently used technique (due to its relative ease of implementation compared to spatially randomized survey techniques), inferring population density of baboons (and possibly other species) based on road transects should be treated with caution. Beyond these methodological concerns and considering only the most conservative estimates, baboon densities in LMNP are among the highest across their geographic distribution range.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35108346
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263314
pii: PONE-D-21-28002
pmc: PMC8809570
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0263314Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018 Sep 19;7(1):157
pubmed: 30228266
Am J Primatol. 2018 Dec;80(12):e22932
pubmed: 30537388
Am J Primatol. 2020 Feb;82(2):e23083
pubmed: 31912545
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2008;79(1):31-51
pubmed: 17855793
Ecol Evol. 2021 Sep 09;11(20):13846-13861
pubmed: 34707822
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2017 Sep 6;6(9):e79
pubmed: 28874791
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1974;21(1):36-60
pubmed: 4210698
J Appl Ecol. 2010 Feb;47(1):5-14
pubmed: 20383262
Sci Adv. 2019 Dec 04;5(12):eaaw9724
pubmed: 31840059
Am J Primatol. 2019 Mar;81(3):e22962
pubmed: 30811079
Elife. 2017 Jan 31;6:
pubmed: 28139196
Ecology. 2016 Apr;97(4):951-60
pubmed: 27220211
Primates. 2006 Jan;47(1):65-73
pubmed: 16132166
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 2;9(1):14243
pubmed: 31578447
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 04;11(2):e0148289
pubmed: 26844891
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jun 10;10(14):6881-6889
pubmed: 32760498
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1973;19(2):104-65
pubmed: 4201907
Nat Commun. 2018 Jan 10;9(1):140
pubmed: 29321529
Oecologia. 1990 Jun;83(3):392-400
pubmed: 28313013
J Med Primatol. 1987;16(4):229-35
pubmed: 3305954
Primates. 2000 Oct;41(4):373-382
pubmed: 30545201
Biometrics. 2010 Dec;66(4):1247-55
pubmed: 20105157
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Oct;15(10):1220-1225
pubmed: 26362174
Am J Primatol. 1982;3(1-4):41-53
pubmed: 31991989
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1976;25(2-3):143-85
pubmed: 817989