Treatment Time of Class II Malocclusion, with and without Mandibular Crowding, Treated with Four Premolar Extractions: A Retrospective Study.
Journal
Turkish journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 2148-9505
Titre abrégé: Turk J Orthod
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101726582
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
entrez:
3
2
2022
pubmed:
4
2
2022
medline:
4
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to compare the treatment times in patients with complete bilateral Class II malocclusion, with and without mandibular crowding, treated with 4 premolar extractions. The sample comprised 57 retrospectively and consecutively selected patients (30 male, 27 female) treated for initial Class II malocclusion, divided as follows: Group 1 consisted of 23 patients (11 males, 12 females; mean age 13.13 years) presenting no crowding or 3 mm at most. Group 2 consisted of 34 patients (19 males, 15 females; mean age13.06 years) presenting more than 4 mm of crowding. Crowding was manually measured in the initial dental casts. The Objective Grading System (OGS) index was manually measured in the final dental casts and radiographic images. The groups were comparable regarding initial age, gender distribution, and final occlusal statuses. The treatment times between the groups were compared using the t-test. Correlation between crowding and treatment time was evaluated with Pearson correlation coefficient. Treatment times between the 2 groups were similar (P = .890) and there was no significant correlation between the amount of crowding and treatment time (r = 0.04, P = .760). Treatment times for complete Class II malocclusion with and without mandibular crowding, treated with 4 premolar extractions, are similar.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35110161
doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20127
pmc: PMC8939195
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
122-126Références
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Jul;102(1):45-51
pubmed: 1626530
World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):e63-71
pubmed: 21490991
Clin Orthod Res. 2001 Nov;4(4):220-7
pubmed: 11683811
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):182-7
pubmed: 21393372
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Nov;152(5):622-630
pubmed: 29103440
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Jul;102(1):1-14
pubmed: 1626523
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):666-71
pubmed: 16679207
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):490-8
pubmed: 17920502
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Apr;111(4):391-400
pubmed: 9109584
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Oct;114(4):383-6
pubmed: 9790321
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):38-49
pubmed: 25279520
J Clin Orthod. 2001 Sep;35(9):570-9
pubmed: 11665551
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Feb;137(2):178-86
pubmed: 20152672
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Apr;125(4):472-9
pubmed: 15067264
Am J Orthod. 1947 May;33(5):253-301
pubmed: 20294224
Angle Orthod. 2011 Mar;81(2):192-7
pubmed: 21208068
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Feb;129(2):230-8
pubmed: 16473715
Angle Orthod. 1968 Apr;38(2):170-3
pubmed: 5239130
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Nov;114(5):589-99
pubmed: 9810056
Angle Orthod. 2008 Mar;78(2):270-4
pubmed: 18251612
Am J Orthod. 1966 Apr;52(4):245-65
pubmed: 5217787
J Clin Orthod. 1976 May;10(5):360-79
pubmed: 1074887
Am J Orthod. 1984 Mar;85(3):238-52
pubmed: 6584033
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Feb;107(2):129-35
pubmed: 7847270
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Mar;135(3):274.e1-8; discussion 274-5
pubmed: 19268819
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Jan;121(1):9-17
pubmed: 11786865