Contamination of Low Frictional Elastomeric Ligatures by Streptococcus mutans: A Prospective RT-PCR and AFM Study.
Journal
Turkish journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 2148-9505
Titre abrégé: Turk J Orthod
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101726582
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
entrez:
3
2
2022
pubmed:
4
2
2022
medline:
4
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare Streptococcus mutans colonization between low-friction elastomeric ligatures and to correlate microbial colonization levels with the surface roughness status. The study included 160 premolars of 10 patients. During the study period, which consisted of 4 sessions each lasting 4 weeks, the ligature types Slide™ Low-Friction Ligature (Leone, Firenze, Italy), Tough-O Energy™ (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, USA), and Sili Ties™ (Dentsply Sirona, Surrey KT13 0NY, UK), and steel ligatures (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA) as a control, were fixed to the premolar teeth by clockwise rotation among the jaw quadrants. The plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) were obtained before bonding (T0), 6 weeks after bonding (T1), and subsequently every 4 weeks (T2, T3, T4). Presence of S. mutans was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction at T1, T2, T3, T4. Surface roughness was evaluated with Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) before ligation (Ra0) and after (Ra1) ligation. The paired t-test, ANOVA, repeated measures of ANOVA, and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for the statistical analysis. S. mutans colonization was significantly higher on the Slide group (P < .05). The lowest Ra0 was seen in Slide and the highest was seen in the Tough-O Energy group. There was no correlation between S. mutans colonization and Ra1 parameters of elastomeric groups (P > .05). S. mutans colonization showed variations in low-friction elastomeric ligatures independent of surface roughness. Ringshaped low-friction elastomeric ligatures were not different from the steel ligature in terms of S. mutans colonization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35110186
doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20091
pmc: PMC8939500
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
163-169Références
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Mar;123(3):345-8
pubmed: 12637907
Br J Orthod. 1992 Aug;19(3):199-205
pubmed: 1390575
Acta Odontol Scand. 1964 Feb;22:121-35
pubmed: 14158464
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):e193-8
pubmed: 21967957
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):ZC26-9
pubmed: 26023638
Eur J Orthod. 2001 Oct;23(5):475-84
pubmed: 11668867
Turk J Orthod. 2018 Mar;31(1):21-25
pubmed: 30112509
New Microbiol. 1997 Jan;20(1):55-62
pubmed: 9037669
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Sep;18(7):1711-8
pubmed: 24728529
Acta Odontol Scand. 1963 Dec;21:533-51
pubmed: 14121956
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Oct;100(4):337-40
pubmed: 1927984
Angle Orthod. 2017 May;87(3):448-454
pubmed: 27849122
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):667-71
pubmed: 24785931
J Dent. 2016 Nov;54:13-24
pubmed: 27546466
J Dent Res. 1994 Mar;73(3):672-81
pubmed: 8163737
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):260-7
pubmed: 23910207
Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):231-6
pubmed: 15825788
Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):211-6
pubmed: 16539544
Trends Microbiol. 2015 Feb;23(2):76-82
pubmed: 25435135
Eur J Orthod. 1991 Oct;13(5):416-20
pubmed: 1748191
Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):1090-5
pubmed: 18004916
Microbiol Rev. 1986 Dec;50(4):353-80
pubmed: 3540569
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002 Nov 19;217(1):23-30
pubmed: 12445641
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2013 Jul 15;6(1):15-24
pubmed: 23991281
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):506-12
pubmed: 18929268
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 May-Jun;18(3):107-12
pubmed: 24094019
Angle Orthod. 2010 May;80(3):547-53
pubmed: 20050751
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):188-94
pubmed: 20691360