Feasibility, Safety, Nodal yields and Learning curves in Retroauricular Robot/Endoscope Assisted Neck Dissection in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer.
Endoscopic neck dissection
Head and neck cancer
Remote access neck surgery
Retroauricular neck dissection
Robotic neck dissection
Journal
Indian journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 0975-7651
Titre abrégé: Indian J Surg Oncol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101532448
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
13
01
2021
accepted:
01
09
2021
entrez:
3
2
2022
pubmed:
4
2
2022
medline:
4
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Head and neck cancer is one of the most common in India. There is an increasing incidence of oral cancer in young patients. Where the primary lesion is amenable to transoral resection for early cancer, young patients are concerned about cosmesis and would prefer a surgical approach that would avoid a visible scar in the neck. Robot/endoscope-assisted neck dissection by retroauricular approach was performed in a total of 28 patients of cN0 patients between June 2016 and December 2019. The duration of surgery, perioperative complications, number of lymph nodes retrieved, and cosmetic outcomes were analyzed. Robot- and endoscope-assisted neck dissections were done in 15 and 13 cases, respectively. The mean age of the cohort was 46.18 ± 9.68 years. Twenty-four patients had tongue cancer. Mean time for skin flap raising, docking, and robotic console use was 48.21 ± 7.48 min, 10 ± 3.16 min, and 176.67 ± 47.27 min, respectively. Mean neck dissection time from skin incision to skin closure was 231.79 ± 54.94 min for completing level I to IV neck dissection. The mean number of retrieved nodes was 33.69 ± 12.81. Majority of the patients were highly satisfied with their cosmetic outcomes. During a median follow-up of 19.5 months, 3 patients developed recurrence. Robot/ endoscope-assisted neck dissection was feasible and safe but took a longer time to perform. Nodal yields were adequate and better cosmetic outcomes were achieved.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35110907
doi: 10.1007/s13193-021-01444-z
pii: 1444
pmc: PMC8763986
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
808-815Informations de copyright
© Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests,
Références
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 May 1;142(5):430-7
pubmed: 26869135
Cancer J. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):151-61
pubmed: 23528724
Head Neck. 2019 Aug;41(8):2801-2810
pubmed: 30969454
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Mar;150(3):394-400
pubmed: 24326866
Sci Rep. 2020 May 12;10(1):7877
pubmed: 32398670
Laryngoscope. 2019 Jul;129(7):1587-1596
pubmed: 30325513
Head Neck. 2015 Feb;37(2):249-54
pubmed: 24375942
Int J Surg. 2016 Jan;25:38-43
pubmed: 26602967
Surgery. 2010 Dec;148(6):1214-21
pubmed: 21134554
Oral Oncol. 2017 Jul;70:51-57
pubmed: 28622891
Oral Oncol. 2019 Dec;99:104461
pubmed: 31678765
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):1009-17
pubmed: 22045466
Thyroid. 2010 Dec;20(12):1327-32
pubmed: 21114381
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;21(9):3049-55
pubmed: 24728823
Oral Oncol. 2017 Apr;67:146-152
pubmed: 28351569
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3871-8
pubmed: 22644516
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Aug;21(4):237-42
pubmed: 21857471
Oncol Res Treat. 2017;40(6):328-332
pubmed: 28531899
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 10;34(32):3892-3897
pubmed: 27480149
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):521-9
pubmed: 26027881