Rubber Dam Isolation for Bonding Ceramic Veneers: A Five-Year Post-Insertion Clinical Report.
bonding
ceramic veneers
dentistry
esthetics
isolation
rubber dam
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
accepted:
27
12
2021
entrez:
3
2
2022
pubmed:
4
2
2022
medline:
4
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It has been well-documented that uncontaminated ground enamel provides the most predictable substrate for the bonding of ceramic veneers, and thus conservative tooth preparation with complete isolation using a rubber dam is key to the long-term success of the restorations presented with five years of follow-up. Rubber dam isolation provides several advantages to the clinician, such as preventing contamination of the working field by saliva, blood, and sulcular fluids, and improving direct visibility. However, it may be a challenge to the younger clinician to properly isolate teeth prior to bonding ceramic veneer. The present case report demonstrated the sequence and some clinical tips for a case in which the rubber dam is placed from a second premolar to the opposite second premolar and held with clamps, the rubber dam is gently invaginated into the sulcus, and clamps are selected and placed on each tooth to create an ideal situation for the adhesion of the ceramic veneer. This step-by-step sequence may help the younger clinician in understanding how to gently manage soft tissue in order to properly provide complete isolation with rubber dam for future bonding of ceramic veneers. Following these methods, the clinician can achieve complete isolation, invaginate the rubber dam in the sulcus without causing tissues to bleed, and reduce the time needed for bonding procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35111437
doi: 10.7759/cureus.20748
pmc: PMC8792124
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
e20748Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, Jurado et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int Endod J. 2006 Dec;39(12):921-30
pubmed: 17180780
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Feb;117(2):327-328
pubmed: 27771147
Quintessence Int. 2019;50(6):488-493
pubmed: 31086859
Int Endod J. 1983 Oct;16(4):173-81
pubmed: 6581135
J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1481-4
pubmed: 24238433
Eur Endod J. 2017 Apr 05;2(1):1-6
pubmed: 33403331
Br Dent J. 2021 May;230(10):644-650
pubmed: 34050295
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 20;9:CD009858
pubmed: 27648846
Int Endod J. 2007 Jun;40(6):427-32
pubmed: 17501755
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Feb;144(2):179-86
pubmed: 23372134
Br Dent J. 2017 Jun 9;222(11):839-840
pubmed: 28703153
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019 Jun 10;5(4):365-376
pubmed: 31452948
Int Endod J. 2000 Sep;33(5):435-41
pubmed: 11307462
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 14;15(9):
pubmed: 30223521
Br Dent J. 1989 Oct 7;167(7):249-52
pubmed: 2789907
Oper Dent. 1989 Autumn;14(4):176-81
pubmed: 2639317
Br Dent J. 2020 Dec;229(11):721-728
pubmed: 33311677