Evaluation of the relationship between joint torque and angular velocity using a modified leg extension machine.
Angular velocity
Joint torque
Leg extension machine
Muscle force
One repetition maximum measurement
Journal
Fujita medical journal
ISSN: 2189-7255
Titre abrégé: Fujita Med J
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101745077
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
10
11
2018
accepted:
08
02
2019
entrez:
3
2
2022
pubmed:
1
1
2019
medline:
1
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
When performing knee extension using a leg extension machine, the lower limb is pushed back in the direction in which knee flexion occurs in response to the freefall of the weight after maximal knee extension. Therefore, eccentric contractions of the knee extensors are needed, which may lead to cumulative fatigue of the extensors, consequently reducing the reliability of the knee extensor torque values. This study aimed to determine the relationship between joint torque and angular velocity in one repetition maximum (1RM) measurement for knee extension using a leg extension machine with and without a modification to prevent counter-rotation. Twenty-one healthy adult men (mean age: 27.7±5.4 years) participated in the study. A leg extension machine was modified to prevent counter-rotation due to the freefall of weights. The subjects performed knee extension using the modified leg extension machine, and the joint torque and angular velocity were calculated using two-dimensional analysis. A regression equation between these two factors was created to estimate the maximal isometric torque. Both the joint torque and angular velocity tended to increase after modification of the leg extension machine, although these differences were not significant. Similarly, there were no significant post-modification changes in the estimated maximal isometric torque. Our results showed that the joint torque, angular velocity, and estimated maximal isometric torque remained unchanged after machine modification; thus, the modified leg extension machine may make it possible to produce the knee extensor torque more safely in 1RM measurement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35111508
doi: 10.20407/fmj.2018-018
pmc: PMC8766240
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
85-91Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Physiother Can. 2013 Spring;65(2):176-82
pubmed: 24403682
Clin Sci (Lond). 1992 Mar;82(3):321-7
pubmed: 1312417
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jul-Aug;77(4):299-305
pubmed: 9715919
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Mar;22(2):464-70
pubmed: 18550961
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Apr;30(4):980-8
pubmed: 26382131
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1997 Jul;52(4):M225-31
pubmed: 9224434
J Sports Sci Med. 2014 Sep 01;13(3):511-5
pubmed: 25177175
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jan;25(1):267-70
pubmed: 19966589
J Sports Sci Med. 2014 Sep 01;13(3):542-9
pubmed: 25177180
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Aug;28(8):2270-80
pubmed: 24476782