Comparison of two methods of bed-to/from-wheelchair transfer in patients with hemiparetic stroke.
Hemiparetic
Lateral
Stroke
Transfer method
Wheelchair users
Journal
Fujita medical journal
ISSN: 2189-7255
Titre abrégé: Fujita Med J
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101745077
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
06
07
2019
accepted:
06
10
2019
entrez:
3
2
2022
pubmed:
1
1
2020
medline:
1
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The ability to transfer between surfaces is essential for wheelchair users' independence. We hypothesized that transfer of hemiparetic stroke patients would be improved by using surfaces at the same height with no gap or obstacle between them. A cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the difficulty of two transfer methods as a pilot study. Thirteen hemiparetic stroke patients were transferred from a platform table to a chair (wheelchair or flat chair) and from the chair to the table using the regular and lateral transfer methods. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) transfer score in both transfer methods and Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS) score were measured. The FIM transfer score significantly increased in the lateral transfer condition compared with the regular transfer condition, indicating that the former method reduced the transfer difficulty, regardless of the SIAS scores. The transfer difficulty of patients with hemiparetic stroke decreases when using the lateral transfer method. The lateral transfer method is easy, potentially helping prevent care-related injuries among caregivers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35111526
doi: 10.20407/fmj.2019-016
pmc: PMC8749507
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
81-86Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Eura Medicophys. 2006 Sep;42(3):179-84
pubmed: 17039213
Fujita Med J. 2019;5(2):31-35
pubmed: 35111498
J Rehabil Med. 2008 Apr;40(4):277-83
pubmed: 18382823
Stroke. 1997 Apr;28(4):722-8
pubmed: 9099186
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Feb;23(2):125-32
pubmed: 19060131
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Dec;77(12):1226-32
pubmed: 8976303
Hum Factors. 2013 Jun;55(3):567-80
pubmed: 23829031
Phys Ther. 2008 May;88(5):608-19
pubmed: 18276935
Assist Technol. 2016 Fall;28(3):183-9
pubmed: 26853925
Rehabil Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):26-35
pubmed: 23780793
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:984526
pubmed: 25162039
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;75(2):127-32
pubmed: 8311667
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003 Dec;29(6):468-77
pubmed: 14712855
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Nov;89(11):2086-93
pubmed: 18996236
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):552-7
pubmed: 26007284
Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Jan;17(1):10-4
pubmed: 7858276
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Nov-Dec;74(6):432-8
pubmed: 8534387
Am J Occup Ther. 2009 May-Jun;63(3):351-62
pubmed: 19522144
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(1):20-9
pubmed: 21591884
Occup Environ Med. 1995 Mar;52(3):160-3
pubmed: 7735387
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Oct;4(5):332-7
pubmed: 22029804
Rehabil Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;40(5):286-93
pubmed: 25042522
Muscle Nerve. 2011 May;43(5):643-7
pubmed: 21462207
Spinal Cord. 1999 Mar;37(3):191-5
pubmed: 10213328
Gait Posture. 1999 Oct;10(2):135-46
pubmed: 10502647
Rehabil Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):91-100
pubmed: 25425040
Stroke. 2003 Feb;34(2):494-501
pubmed: 12574566
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1785-92
pubmed: 27084267
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 Dec;16(4):339-51
pubmed: 12462765
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Nov;26(9):923-9
pubmed: 21664733
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1988;107(6):345-7
pubmed: 3240073
Phys Ther. 1996 Aug;76(8):827-35
pubmed: 8710962
Home Healthc Nurse. 2007 Oct;25(9):577-9
pubmed: 18049253
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994 Sep;26(3):115-9
pubmed: 7801060
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Jun;74(6):566-73
pubmed: 8503745
BMJ. 1997 Apr 26;314(7089):1225-8
pubmed: 9154024
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jul;94(7):1230-46
pubmed: 23537608