Association of Health Insurance Literacy With Enrollment in Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Plan Characteristics Within Medicare Advantage.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 02 2022
Historique:
entrez: 3 2 2022
pubmed: 4 2 2022
medline: 1 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Health insurance literacy helps individuals make informed choices. However, evidence suggests that Medicare beneficiaries experience low health insurance literacy, leading to high-cost or poor-quality coverage choices. To examine how health insurance literacy was associated with coverage choices between traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage (MA), as well as within MA. This cross-sectional study included 6627 TM and MA enrollees, using data from the 2015-2016 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Data analyses were conducted between May 1 and June 30, 2021. Three self-reported measures of health insurance literacy (presence of information to make an informed comparison, ease in reviewing and comparing coverage options, and annual review and comparison of coverage options). Enrollment in TM vs MA and enrollment in an MA plan with different characteristics (star rating, monthly plan premium, in-network maximum out-of-pocket limit, plan type, and provision of supplemental benefits). We included 6627 Medicare beneficiaries (3578 women [54.0%]; mean [SD] age, 75.13 [7.12] years). A total of 77 individuals were Asian (1.2%), 696 were Black (10.5%), 488 were Hispanic (7.4%), 5277 were non-Hispanic White (79.6%), and 225 (3.4%) were single races not of Hispanic origin (including American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian) or were 2 or more races. Medicare Advantage enrollment was higher among individuals with higher health insurance literacy than those with lower health insurance literacy, especially for those who reviewed or compared coverage options annually than among those who did not (38.0%; 95% CI, 36.0%-40.1% vs 27.8%; 95% CI, 25.8%-29.7%). Among MA beneficiaries, those who reviewed or compared coverage options annually were more likely to enroll in plans with 4 to 4.5 stars and plans with monthly premiums of $1 to $50 by 4.6 percentage points (95% CI, 0.1-9.2 percentage points) and 4.8 percentage points (95% CI, 0.6-9.0 percentage points), respectively. However, enrollment in plans with 5 stars was 3.8 percentage points lower (95% CI, -5.8 to -1.9 percentage points) among individuals who reviewed or compared coverage options annually than among those who did not. Among individuals with low socioeconomic status, the likelihood of reviewing or comparing coverage options annually was lower for those with Medicare and Medicaid dual eligibility than for those without it (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99). Results of this study suggest that higher health insurance literacy-particularly, annual review and comparison of coverage choices-is associated with higher MA enrollment and choice of a particular MA plan. Policy makers should develop programs to encourage frequent review and comparison of coverage options for informed decision making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35113164
pii: 2788633
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46792
pmc: PMC8814909
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2146792

Références

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211762
pubmed: 33729504
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011 Feb;2:1-17
pubmed: 21348328
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Feb;40(2):243-250
pubmed: 33523734
Am Econ Rev. 2015 Aug;105(8):2449-500
pubmed: 29546969
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1786-94
pubmed: 21852301
Milbank Q. 2014 Jun;92(2):351-94
pubmed: 24890251
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2336-2342
pubmed: 32744734
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):48-55
pubmed: 25561643
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2019 Apr;11(2):302-332
pubmed: 31131073
Am Econ Rev. 2011 May;101(3):377-381
pubmed: 25663708
Med Care. 2021 Jan;59(1):53-57
pubmed: 32925464
JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2238-2240
pubmed: 31184727
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jan;37(1):78-85
pubmed: 29309215
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241
pubmed: 26282952
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Sep 1;177(9):1287-1295
pubmed: 28692718
JAMA. 2013 Jan 16;309(3):267-74
pubmed: 23321765
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Aug;106(8):2145-2184
pubmed: 29104294
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Mar 1;25(3):e71-e75
pubmed: 30875174

Auteurs

Sungchul Park (S)

Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Brent A Langellier (BA)

Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

David J Meyers (DJ)

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH