Predictors of hearing functional outcome following surgery for cerebellopontine angle meningioma.
Cerebellopontine angle
Facial nerve
Hearing preservation
Hearing rehabilitation
Meningioma
Journal
Journal of neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1573-7373
Titre abrégé: J Neurooncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
19
11
2021
accepted:
28
01
2022
pubmed:
4
2
2022
medline:
7
4
2022
entrez:
3
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningiomas can affect hearing function and require expeditious treatment to prevent permanent hearing loss. The authors sought to determine the factors associated with functional hearing outcome in CPA meningioma patients treated with surgery and/or radiation therapy in the form of either stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic radiation therapy. Consecutive patients with CPA meningiomas who had presented at our hospital from 2008 to 2018 were identified through retrospective chart review. Hearing function (as defined by pure tone average (PTA) and speech discrimination score (SDS) on Audiogram) was assessed before and after surgery for CPA meningioma. Audiograms with PTA > 50 dB and SDS < 69% were defined as poor hearing functional outcome. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model was used to assess the associations between pre-operative hearing functional assessment and post-operative hearing functional outcomes. The study cohort included 31 patients (80.6% females, with a mean age of 61.3 ± 15.2 years) with a median clinical follow-up of 5 months (range: 1 week-98 months). The mean pre-operative PTA and SDS were 23.8 ± 11.2 dB and 64.4 ± 22.2% respectively. At the last visit, there was significant hearing recovery, with an improvement of 29.7 ± 18.0 dB (p < 0.001) and 87.6 ± 17.8% (p < 0.001) in PTA and SDS respectively. After adjusting for age, gender, tumor volume, location, and tumor classification, Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model was conducted which revealed that patients undergoing surgery through retro sigmoid approach [Hazards Ratio (HR): 32.1, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.11-491.0, p = 0.01] and gross total resection (GTR) (HR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.09-9.32, p = 0.05) had significantly higher risk of poor hearing functional outcome compared to petrosal approach and near/subtotal resection. Moreover, patients with poor preoperative hearing had 85% higher chance of poor hearing functional outcome postoperatively (HR: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.03-0.59, p = 0.007). Postoperative improvement in hearing is a reasonable expectation following surgery for CPA meningioma. Preoperative hearing, surgical approach and extent of surgical resection are predictive factors of postoperative hearing function outcome and can therefore aid in identification of patients at higher risk of hearing loss.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35113287
doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-03958-0
pii: 10.1007/s11060-022-03958-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
165-176Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Kankane V, Warade A, Misra B (2019) Nonvestibular schwannoma tumors in the cerebellopontine angle: a single-surgeon experience. Asian J Neurosurg 14:154. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_335_17
doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_335_17
pubmed: 30937027
pmcid: 6417343
Mkrtchyan N, Alciato L, Kalamarides M et al (2021) Hearing recovery after surgical resection of non-vestibular schwannoma cerebellopontine angle tumors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06956-6
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06956-6
pubmed: 34175969
Alvernia JE, Dang ND, Sindou MP (2011) Convexity meningiomas: study of recurrence factors with special emphasis on the cleavage plane in a series of 100 consecutive patients: clinical article. JNS 115:491–498. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.4.JNS101922
doi: 10.3171/2011.4.JNS101922
Tirumani SH, Shinagare AB, O’Neill AC et al (2016) Accuracy and feasibility of estimated tumour volumetry in primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours: validation using semiautomated technique in 127 patients. Eur Radiol 26:286–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3829-6
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3829-6
pubmed: 25991487
Bucci MK, Maity A, Janss AJ et al (2004) Near complete surgical resection predicts a favorable outcome in pediatric patients with nonbrainstem, malignant gliomas: results from a single center in the magnetic resonance imaging era. Cancer 101:817–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20422
doi: 10.1002/cncr.20422
pubmed: 15305415
Gurgel RK, Jackler RK, Dobie RA, Popelka GR (2012) A new standardized format for reporting hearing outcome in clinical trials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147:803–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812458401
doi: 10.1177/0194599812458401
pubmed: 22931898
Agarwal V, Babu R, Grier J et al (2013) Cerebellopontine angle meningiomas: postoperative outcomes in a modern cohort. FOC 35:E10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.10.FOCUS13367
doi: 10.3171/2013.10.FOCUS13367
Gao K, Ma H, Cui Y et al (2015) Meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle: radiological differences in tumors with internal auditory canal involvement and their influence on surgical outcome. PLoS ONE 10:e0122949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122949
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122949
pubmed: 25849220
pmcid: 4388680
Roser F, Nakamura M, Dormiani M et al (2005) Meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle with extension into the internal auditory canal. J Neurosurg 102:17–23. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.1.0017
doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.1.0017
pubmed: 15658091
Peyre M, Bozorg-Grayeli A, Rey A et al (2012) Posterior petrous bone meningiomas: surgical experience in 53 patients and literature review. Neurosurg Rev 35:53–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-011-0333-6
doi: 10.1007/s10143-011-0333-6
pubmed: 21670954
Desgeorges M, Sterkers O (1994) Anatomo-radiological classification of meningioma of the posterior skull base. Neurochirurgie 40:273–295
pubmed: 7596448
Nakamura M, Roser F, Dormiani M et al (2005) Facial and cochlear nerve function after surgery of cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. Neurosurgery 57:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000154699.29796.34
doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000154699.29796.34
pubmed: 15987543
Wu ZB, Yu CJ, Guan SS (2005) Posterior petrous meningiomas: 82 cases. J Neurosurg 102:284–289. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0284
doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0284
pubmed: 15739556
Bassiouni H, Hunold A, Asgari S, Stolke D (2004) Meningiomas of the posterior petrous bone: functional outcome after microsurgery. J Neurosurg 100:1014–1024. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.6.1014
doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.6.1014
pubmed: 15200116
Peraio S, Ebner F, Tatagiba M (2018) Posterior fossa meningioma with invasion of the internal acoustic canal. Acta Neurochir 160:1823–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3623-8
doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3623-8
pubmed: 30058027
Bambakidis NC, Kakarla UK, Kim LJ et al (2007) Evolution of surgical approaches in the treatment of petroclival meningiomas: a retrospective review. Op Neurosurg 61:202–211
doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000303218.61230.39
De la Cruz A, Teufert KB (2009) Transcochlear approach to cerebellopontine angle and clivus lesions: indications, results, and complications. Otol Neurotol 30:373–380. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819a892b
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819a892b
pubmed: 19318889
Ichimura S, Kawase T, Onozuka S et al (2008) Four subtypes of petroclival meningiomas: differences in symptoms and operative findings using the anterior transpetrosal approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:637–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-1586-x
doi: 10.1007/s00701-008-1586-x
Kane AJ, Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ et al (2011) Clinical and surgical considerations for cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. J Clin Neurosci 18:755–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.09.023
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.09.023
pubmed: 21507650
Leonetti JP, Anderson DE, Marzo SJ et al (2006) Combined transtemporal access for large (>3 cm) meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:949–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2005.12.017
doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.12.017
pubmed: 16730536
Nowak A, Dziedzic T, Marchei A (2013) Surgical management of posterior petrous meningiomas. Neurol Neurochir Pol 47:456–466. https://doi.org/10.5114/ninp.2013.38225
doi: 10.5114/ninp.2013.38225
pubmed: 24166567
Batra PS, Dutra JC, Wiet RJ (2002) Auditory and facial nerve function following surgery for cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:369. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.4.369
doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.4.369
pubmed: 11926909
Devèze A, Franco-Vidal V, Liguoro D et al (2007) Transpetrosal approaches for meningiomas of the posterior aspect of the petrous bone. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109:578–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.05.019
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.05.019
pubmed: 17604904
von Eckardstein KL, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ (2010) Outcome after microsurgery for meningiomas involving the internal auditory canal. Neurosurgery 67:1236–1242. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181efe412
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181efe412