Cultivating researcher-policymaker partnerships: A randomized controlled trial of a model for training public psychologists.


Journal

The American psychologist
ISSN: 1935-990X
Titre abrégé: Am Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370521

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
entrez: 3 2 2022
pubmed: 4 2 2022
medline: 22 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Key to bringing psychological science to bear on public policy is developing scholars' engagement and rapport with policymakers. Scholars benefit from support navigating the policy arena in ways that strengthen their independent policy engagement. This study presents findings from a randomized controlled trial of the Research-to-Policy Collaboration (RPC) model, which develops and trains a rapid response network of researchers to respond to legislative requests for scientific evidence. Researchers were surveyed on their concerns about how policymakers support or use scientific research, how they engaged with policymakers, and perceived benefits to their research. Researchers randomized to the RPC reported fewer concerns about policymakers' support and use of research, greater involvement in supporting policymakers' understanding of problems (i.e., conceptual use), and more responses to external prompts for their involvement. Subgroup analyses examined how experiences differed for those identifying as Black, Indigenous, or Person of Color (BIPOC). At baseline, BIPOC-identifying researchers perceived greater costs of policy engagement and reported less involvement in supporting conceptual or instrumental uses of research than White-identifying researchers. Subsequent to the RPC, BIPOC-identifying researchers in the intervention group were reportedly less concerned about federal support of science, more engaged in supporting conceptual uses of research, and perceived greater benefits of policy engagement for their research than BIPOC-identifying researchers in the control group. These differences were not observed among White-identifying researchers. Findings are discussed in light of disparities experienced by marginalized scholars, the ways in which resources and supports may counteract these challenges, and possible strategies to strengthen public psychology overall. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiants

pubmed: 35113595
pii: 2022-28577-008
doi: 10.1037/amp0000880
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1307-1322

Subventions

Organisme : WT Grant Foundation
Organisme : National Institute on Child and Human Development
Organisme : Pennsylvania State University; Social Science Research Institute

Auteurs

D Max Crowley (DM)

College of Health and Human Development.

J Taylor Scott (JT)

College of Health and Human Development.

Elizabeth C Long (EC)

College of Health and Human Development.

Lawrie Green (L)

College of Health and Human Development.

Cagla Giray (C)

College of Health and Human Development.

Azaliah Israel (A)

College of Health and Human Development.

Rachel Storace (R)

College of Health and Human Development.

Mary McCauley (M)

College of Health and Human Development.

Michael Donovan (M)

College of Health and Human Development.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH