Two Hits for Bone Regeneration in Aged Patients: Vertebral Bone Marrow Clot as a Biological Scaffold and Powerful Source of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
aging
bone marrow
clot
orthopedic injuries
regenerative medicine
Journal
Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology
ISSN: 2296-4185
Titre abrégé: Front Bioeng Biotechnol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101632513
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
02
11
2021
accepted:
20
12
2021
entrez:
4
2
2022
pubmed:
5
2
2022
medline:
5
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recently, the use of a new formulation of bone marrow aspirate (BMA), the BMA clot, has been described. This product entails a naturally formed clot from the harvested bone marrow, which retains all the BMA components preserved in a matrix biologically molded by the clot. Even though its beneficial effects were demonstrated by some studies, the impact of aging and aging-associated processes on biological properties and the effect of BMA cell-based therapy are currently unknown. The purpose of our study was to compare selected parameters and properties of clotted BMA and BMA-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from younger (<45 years) and older (>65 years) female donors. Clotted BMA growth factors (GFs) expression, MSCs morphology and viability, doubling time, surface marker expression, clonogenic potential, three-lineage differentiation, senescence-associated factors, and Klotho synthesis from younger and older donors were analyzed. Results indicated that donor age does not affect tissue-specific BMA clot regenerative properties such as GFs expression and MSCs morphology, viability, doubling time, surface antigens expression, colony-forming units, osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, and Klotho and senescence-associated gene expression. Only few differences, i.e., increased platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB) synthesis and MSCs Aggrecan (ACAN) expression, were detected in younger donors in comparison with older ones. However, these differences do not interfere with all the other BMA clot biological properties. These results demonstrated that BMA clot can be applied easily, without any sample processing and avoiding potential contamination risks as well as losing cell viability, proliferation, and differentiation ability, for autologous transplantation in aged patients. The vertebral BMA clot showed two successful hits since it works as a biological scaffold and as a powerful source of mesenchymal stem cells, thus representing a novel and advanced therapeutic alternative for the treatment of orthopedic injuries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35118056
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.807679
pii: 807679
pmc: PMC8804319
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
807679Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Salamanna, Contartese, Borsari, Pagani, Barbanti Brodano, Griffoni, Ricci, Gasbarrini and Fini.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Oct;11(Suppl 5):S789-S794
pubmed: 32999557
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2012 Jul;21(4):362-8
pubmed: 22660551
Development. 2015 Mar 1;142(5):817-31
pubmed: 25715393
Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2005 Sep;75(3):200-12
pubmed: 16187326
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021 Jul 2;12(1):377
pubmed: 34215342
J Clin Med. 2014 Jan 21;3(1):88-134
pubmed: 24757526
Int J Mol Med. 2017 Apr;39(4):775-782
pubmed: 28290609
J Cell Physiol. 2015 Nov;230(11):2618-25
pubmed: 25820482
Bone Joint Res. 2019 Apr 2;8(3):107-117
pubmed: 30997036
Bioact Mater. 2020 Sep 21;6(3):666-683
pubmed: 33005830
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Jan 5;122(1):83-7
pubmed: 19187622
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Nov;50(11):3561-73
pubmed: 15529345
Tissue Eng Part A. 2010 Mar;16(3):983-93
pubmed: 19839721
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016 Mar 22;7:44
pubmed: 27006071
Materials (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;14(16):
pubmed: 34443163
Stem Cells Dev. 2013 Jan 15;22(2):181-92
pubmed: 23030230
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Feb;(407):102-18
pubmed: 12567137
Bone. 2015 Jan;70:37-47
pubmed: 25445445
Aging Cell. 2018 Feb;17(1):
pubmed: 29210174
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018 May 1;10(5):
pubmed: 28507020
OMICS. 2021 Jun;25(6):342-357
pubmed: 34115524
Pharmacol Res. 2021 Oct;172:105851
pubmed: 34450314
Biomed Mater Eng. 2017;28(s1):S57-S63
pubmed: 28372278
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 May 11;356(3):780-4
pubmed: 17382293
Mol Cancer Res. 2002 Dec;1(2):147-54
pubmed: 12496361
Genes Dev. 2002 Nov 1;16(21):2813-28
pubmed: 12414734
Stem Cell Reports. 2021 Apr 13;16(4):694-707
pubmed: 33636113
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Sep 30;43(17):8183-203
pubmed: 26150426
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 5;10(1):4115
pubmed: 32139727
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jul 19;17(7):
pubmed: 27447618
Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-8
pubmed: 18546601
J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Sep;23(9):1519-28
pubmed: 18410236
J Dent Res. 2010 Dec;89(12):1333-48
pubmed: 20924069
Tissue Eng Part A. 2011 Jul;17(13-14):1891-9
pubmed: 21413900
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Oct 22;11(20):9128-9146
pubmed: 31644429
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jul;87(7):896-902
pubmed: 15972899
Adv Healthc Mater. 2016 Oct;5(19):2501-2509
pubmed: 27581621
Cell Transplant. 2017 Sep;26(9):1520-1529
pubmed: 29113463
Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):123-30
pubmed: 16246584
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Jun;101(6):724-9
pubmed: 16731390
Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:2152435
pubmed: 26941800
J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Jul;14(7):1115-22
pubmed: 10404011
Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;58(5):515-23
pubmed: 25535411
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021 Jun 22;12(1):360
pubmed: 34158116