The use of aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the diagnosis of lung cancer: a narrative review.

Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) COVID-19 bronchoscopy lung function tests pleural procedures

Journal

Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China)
ISSN: 2522-6711
Titre abrégé: Mediastinum
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101731833

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 20 02 2021
accepted: 13 07 2021
entrez: 4 2 2022
pubmed: 5 2 2022
medline: 5 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In this article we discuss the current evidence for these concerns and highlight where further work is required to understand the risk from these procedures and how it can be mitigated for. The COVID-19 (coronavirus-19 or SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has impacted on many aspects of patient care both for those with the virus and those with other illnesses. Of particular concern has been the risk to staff and patients from the spread of the virus in health care settings. This has led to changes in guidelines and practice in community and hospital settings that has implications on patient diagnostic pathways in lung cancer, with a specific emphasis on aerosol generating procedures (AGPs). A literature search was carried out and 44 abstracts were initially found. Given the novel status of COVID-19, we included severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in our search. Five papers were selected for further analysis. An additional paper was highlighted during our research and therefore included in our review. The papers selected assessed the risk of transmission during AGPs. The six articles selected assessed the risk of aerosol transmission during various AGPs (bronchoscopy, pleural procedures and pulmonary function tests) and each found that the risk of viral transmission via aerosol was low. As mentioned above, at the time the paper was written, there was a paucity of evidence regarding AGPs in the era of COVID-19. There is emerging evidence that our understanding of these procedures may be outdated and the risk of transmission maybe lower than previously anticipated. However, we need further reliable evidence to change practice going forward.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
In this article we discuss the current evidence for these concerns and highlight where further work is required to understand the risk from these procedures and how it can be mitigated for.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 (coronavirus-19 or SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has impacted on many aspects of patient care both for those with the virus and those with other illnesses. Of particular concern has been the risk to staff and patients from the spread of the virus in health care settings. This has led to changes in guidelines and practice in community and hospital settings that has implications on patient diagnostic pathways in lung cancer, with a specific emphasis on aerosol generating procedures (AGPs).
METHODS METHODS
A literature search was carried out and 44 abstracts were initially found. Given the novel status of COVID-19, we included severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in our search. Five papers were selected for further analysis. An additional paper was highlighted during our research and therefore included in our review.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The papers selected assessed the risk of transmission during AGPs. The six articles selected assessed the risk of aerosol transmission during various AGPs (bronchoscopy, pleural procedures and pulmonary function tests) and each found that the risk of viral transmission via aerosol was low. As mentioned above, at the time the paper was written, there was a paucity of evidence regarding AGPs in the era of COVID-19. There is emerging evidence that our understanding of these procedures may be outdated and the risk of transmission maybe lower than previously anticipated. However, we need further reliable evidence to change practice going forward.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35118334
doi: 10.21037/med-21-16
pii: med-05-29
pmc: PMC8794367
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

29

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K002597/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

2021 Mediastinum. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med-21-16). The series “Changes in management of mediastinal tumours following the surge of COVID-19 pandemic” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):514-523
pubmed: 31986261
Euro Surveill. 2020 Feb;25(6):
pubmed: 32070465
J Hosp Infect. 2021 Apr;110:194-200
pubmed: 33549768
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2020 Oct;27(4):e52-e54
pubmed: 32195687
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2020 Dec;49(12):1013-1017
pubmed: 33463660
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Dec;42(12):1535-1537
pubmed: 33213540
PLoS One. 2010 May 19;5(5):e10717
pubmed: 20502660
Thorax. 2021 Nov 2;:
pubmed: 34728573
Chest. 2020 Dec;158(6):2467-2473
pubmed: 32707180
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jul;9(7):687-689
pubmed: 33965002
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Nov;7(1):
pubmed: 33148778
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Feb;10(2):251-5
pubmed: 15030692
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jul;8(7):666-667
pubmed: 32479795
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):425-434
pubmed: 32105637
Chest. 2021 Feb;159(2):870-872
pubmed: 33039461
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):697-706
pubmed: 32224310

Auteurs

Siyamini Vythilingam (S)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.

Matthew Quint (M)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.

Richard Newsom (R)

School of Health and Care Professions, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

Alexander Hicks (A)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.

Classifications MeSH