Ronapreve (REGN-CoV; casirivimab and imdevimab) reduces the viral burden and alters the pulmonary response to the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant (B.1.617.2) in K18-hACE2 mice using an experimental design reflective of a treatment use case.


Journal

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
Titre abrégé: bioRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101680187

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Mar 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 5 2 2022
medline: 5 2 2022
entrez: 4 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Ronapreve demonstrated clinical application in post-exposure prophylaxis, mild/moderate disease and in the treatment of seronegative patients with severe COVID19 prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant in late 2021. Numerous reports have described loss of The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of Ronapreve on compartmental viral replication as a paradigm for a monoclonal antibody combination. The study also sought to confirm absence of Virological efficacy of Ronapreve was assessed in K18-hACE2 mice inoculated with either the SARS-CoV-2 Delta or Omicron variants. Viral replication in tissues was quantified using qRT-PCR to measure sub-genomic viral RNA to the E gene (sgE) as a proxy. A histological examination in combination with staining for viral antigen served to determine viral spread and associated damage. Ronapreve reduced sub-genomic viral RNA levels in lung and nasal turbinate, 4 and 6 days post infection, for the Delta variant but not the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 at doses 2-fold higher than those shown to be active against previous variants of the virus. It also appeared to block brain infection which is seen with high frequency in K18-hACE2 mice after Delta variant infection. At day 6, the inflammatory response to lung infection with the Delta variant was altered to a mild multifocal granulomatous inflammation in which the virus appeared to be confined. A similar tendency was also observed in Omicron infected, Ronapreve-treated animals. The current study provides evidence of an altered tissue response to the SARS-CoV-2 after treatment with a monoclonal antibody combination that retains neutralization activity. These data also demonstrate that experimental designs that reflect the treatment use case are achievable in animal models for monoclonal antibodies deployed against susceptible variants. Extreme caution should be taken when interpreting prophylactic experimental designs when assessing plausibility of monoclonal antibodies for treatment use cases.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Ronapreve demonstrated clinical application in post-exposure prophylaxis, mild/moderate disease and in the treatment of seronegative patients with severe COVID19 prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant in late 2021. Numerous reports have described loss of
Objectives UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of Ronapreve on compartmental viral replication as a paradigm for a monoclonal antibody combination. The study also sought to confirm absence of
Methods UNASSIGNED
Virological efficacy of Ronapreve was assessed in K18-hACE2 mice inoculated with either the SARS-CoV-2 Delta or Omicron variants. Viral replication in tissues was quantified using qRT-PCR to measure sub-genomic viral RNA to the E gene (sgE) as a proxy. A histological examination in combination with staining for viral antigen served to determine viral spread and associated damage.
Results UNASSIGNED
Ronapreve reduced sub-genomic viral RNA levels in lung and nasal turbinate, 4 and 6 days post infection, for the Delta variant but not the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 at doses 2-fold higher than those shown to be active against previous variants of the virus. It also appeared to block brain infection which is seen with high frequency in K18-hACE2 mice after Delta variant infection. At day 6, the inflammatory response to lung infection with the Delta variant was altered to a mild multifocal granulomatous inflammation in which the virus appeared to be confined. A similar tendency was also observed in Omicron infected, Ronapreve-treated animals.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
The current study provides evidence of an altered tissue response to the SARS-CoV-2 after treatment with a monoclonal antibody combination that retains neutralization activity. These data also demonstrate that experimental designs that reflect the treatment use case are achievable in animal models for monoclonal antibodies deployed against susceptible variants. Extreme caution should be taken when interpreting prophylactic experimental designs when assessing plausibility of monoclonal antibodies for treatment use cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35118468
doi: 10.1101/2022.01.23.477397
pmc: PMC8811901
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Preprint

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI134091
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R24 AI118397
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Transparency declarations AO and SR are Directors of Tandem Nano Ltd and co-inventors of patents relating to drug delivery. AO has been co-investigator on funding received by the University of Liverpool from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences unrelated to COVID-19 in the past 3 years. AO has received personal fees from Gilead and Assembly Biosciences in the past 3 years unrelated to COVID-19. AO was a member of the Trial Management Group for the AGILE phase I/II platform trial until January 2023 and AGILE received funding from Ridgeback and GSK in the past 3 years for which AO was not a co-investigator. SR has received research funding from ViiV and AstraZeneca and consultancy from Gilead not related to the current paper. No other conflicts are declared by the authors.

Auteurs

Lee Tatham (L)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Anja Kipar (A)

Laboratory for Animal Model Pathology, Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 268, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Infection Biology & Microbiomes, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Joanne Sharp (J)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Edyta Kijak (E)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Joanne Herriott (J)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Megan Neary (M)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Helen Box (H)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Eduardo Gallardo Toledo (EG)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Anthony Valentijn (A)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Helen Cox (H)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Henry Pertinez (H)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Paul Curley (P)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Usman Arshad (U)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Rajith Kr Rajoli (RK)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Steve Rannard (S)

Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

James Stewart (J)

Department of Infection Biology & Microbiomes, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Andrew Owen (A)

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Classifications MeSH