Simulation models and training curricula for training in endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: A systematic review from ESUT.
Journal
Turkish journal of urology
ISSN: 2149-3235
Titre abrégé: Turk J Urol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101643563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
entrez:
4
2
2022
pubmed:
5
2
2022
medline:
5
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The introduction of endoscopic anatomical enucleation of the prostate created a new educational field. We investigated the current literature for simulators, phantoms, and other training models that could be used as a tool for teaching urologists alone or within the boundaries of a course or a curriculum. A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement and the European Association of Urology Guidelines office's recommendations for conducting systematic reviews. Seven out of 51 studies met our inclusion criteria and are presented in the current review. The VirtaMed UroSim HoLEP (Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate) Simulator achieved excellent scores for face, content, and construct validity, and participants agreed that it could be used for training. In addition, this simulator offers the opportunity for morcellation training. The Kansai University model for HoLEP does not support morcellation simulation and has only demonstrated face and content validity. The CyberSim (Quanta System, Solbiate Olona, VA, Italy) has not been yet evaluated, but it seems that it can be used for training without tutoring. Only one training curriculum was revealed from the search. The Holmium User Group-Mentorship Program has been proposed since 2005 for training urologists for HoLEP. Simulators and courses or curricula based on a simulator could be valuable learning and training tools. The existent models seem efficient but have not been widely evaluated and accepted yet. It seems that the training field for transurethral enucleation of the prostate will be rapidly developed soon.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35118948
doi: 10.5152/tju.2021.21134
pmc: PMC9612762
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
250-259Références
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):1747-1756
pubmed: 32772149
Eur Urol. 2008 Apr;53(4):744-9
pubmed: 17475395
World J Urol. 2015 Apr;33(4):497-502
pubmed: 25271105
J Surg Educ. 2014 May-Jun;71(3):339-44
pubmed: 24797849
Eur Urol. 2007 Nov;52(5):1465-71
pubmed: 17498867
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Sep;60(5):333-342
pubmed: 31501795
BMC Urol. 2015 Jun 09;15:49
pubmed: 26055885
BJU Int. 2011 Apr;107(7):1030-43
pubmed: 21438974
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1066-1096
pubmed: 24972732
Urology. 2015 Sep;86(3):639-46
pubmed: 26126694
J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):1105-9
pubmed: 20092844
BJU Int. 2016 Mar;117(3):495-9
pubmed: 25781490
Urology. 2015 Oct;86(4):824-9
pubmed: 26254171
Urology. 2018 Oct;120:9-22
pubmed: 30403609
Urology. 2019 Mar;125:34-39
pubmed: 30615893
Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):290-300
pubmed: 28917594
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 31;10(3):e0121265
pubmed: 25826453
BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(7):1132-8
pubmed: 21231991
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;11(11):1149-54
pubmed: 15528578
World J Urol. 2017 Jun;35(6):973-983
pubmed: 27766387