Instruments for investigation of epilepsy in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.
Developing countries
Development
Epileptic seizures
Management
Tools
Validation
Journal
Epilepsy research
ISSN: 1872-6844
Titre abrégé: Epilepsy Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8703089
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
28
09
2021
revised:
13
12
2021
accepted:
17
01
2022
pubmed:
6
2
2022
medline:
31
3
2022
entrez:
5
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Systematic reviews were conducted on the existence of screening tools for epilepsy, quality of life or comorbidities tools, but not specifically in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify the different tools developed and validated in low- and middle-income countries for the investigation of epilepsy. This to facilitate research in these regions and to identify needs in areas where few instruments are available. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, MedLine, Google Scholar, Web of Science, SciELO, Neurology Asia, African Journal of Neurological Sciences and Institute of Epidemiology and Tropical Neurology bibliographic databases were investigated. Articles were included according to the following criteria: (1) to be validation studies on tool for investigating epilepsy, (2) to be conducted in a low- or middle-income country, (3) to be published between 1980 and 2021, and (4) to be written in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese. The characteristics of the tools and validation methods were collected. The frequency of use of the tools was estimated. Ninety-three articles were retained, corresponding to 91 tools from 44 countries. The main tools targeted quality of life (n = 30), comorbidities (n = 19) and screening (n = 13). Instruments were mainly developed and validated in Asia (n = 43), then in Central and South America (n = 24). The IENT (Institute of Epidemiology and Tropical Neurology) questionnaire was developed in several tropical countries (Africa, South East Asia and Latin America). The development and validation methods were heterogeneous from one tool to another and some tools (e.g., QOLIE-31, NDDI-E, PATE, etc.) were culturally adapted. This review identifies geographic specificity regarding the creation, validation and use of tools for investigating epilepsy available in low- and middle-income countries. It will help investigators in the choice of tools in their future epidemiological studies on epilepsy in this context.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35121203
pii: S0920-1211(22)00016-X
doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106865
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106865Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.