Integrating molecular profiles into clinical frameworks through the Molecular Oncology Almanac to prospectively guide precision oncology.
Journal
Nature cancer
ISSN: 2662-1347
Titre abrégé: Nat Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101761119
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
24
09
2020
accepted:
14
07
2021
entrez:
5
2
2022
pubmed:
6
2
2022
medline:
6
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tumor molecular profiling of single gene-variant ('first-order') genomic alterations informs potential therapeutic approaches. Interactions between such first-order events and global molecular features (for example, mutational signatures) are increasingly associated with clinical outcomes, but these 'second-order' alterations are not yet accounted for in clinical interpretation algorithms and knowledge bases. We introduce the Molecular Oncology Almanac (MOAlmanac), a paired clinical interpretation algorithm and knowledge base to enable integrative interpretation of multimodal genomic data for point-of-care decision making and translational-hypothesis generation. We benchmarked MOAlmanac to a first-order interpretation method across multiple retrospective cohorts and observed an increased number of clinical hypotheses from evaluation of molecular features and profile-to-cell line matchmaking. When applied to a prospective precision oncology trial cohort, MOAlmanac nominated a median of two therapies per patient and identified therapeutic strategies administered in 47% of patients. Overall, we present an open-source computational method for integrative clinical interpretation of individualized molecular profiles.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35121878
doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00243-3
pii: 10.1038/s43018-021-00243-3
pmc: PMC9082009
mid: NIHMS1794969
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1102-1112Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA233100
Pays : United States
Organisme : Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HG002295
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA227388
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R21 CA242861
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R37 CA222574
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
AACR Project GENIE Consortium. AACR Project GENIE: powering precision medicine through an international consortium. Cancer Discov. 7, 818–831 (2017).
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0151
Van Allen, E. M. et al. Whole-exome sequencing and clinical interpretation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples to guide precision cancer medicine. Nat. Med. 20, 682–688 (2014).
pubmed: 24836576
pmcid: 4048335
doi: 10.1038/nm.3559
Chakravarty, D. et al. OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base. JCO Precis. Oncol. 2017, PO.17.00011 (2017).
Griffith, M. et al. CIViC is a community knowledgebase for expert crowdsourcing the clinical interpretation of variants in cancer. Nat. Genet. 49, 170–174 (2017).
pubmed: 28138153
pmcid: 5367263
doi: 10.1038/ng.3774
Wagner, A. H. et al. A harmonized meta-knowledgebase of clinical interpretations of somatic genomic variants in cancer. Nat. Genet. 52, 448–457 (2020).
pubmed: 32246132
pmcid: 7127986
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0603-8
Patterson, S. E., Statz, C. M., Yin, T. & Mockus, S. M. Utility of the JAX Clinical Knowledgebase in capture and assessment of complex genomic cancer data. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 3, 2 (2019).
pubmed: 30675517
pmcid: 6333807
doi: 10.1038/s41698-018-0073-y
Tamborero, D. et al. Cancer Genome Interpreter annotates the biological and clinical relevance of tumor alterations. Genome Med. 10, 25 (2018).
pubmed: 29592813
pmcid: 5875005
doi: 10.1186/s13073-018-0531-8
Huang, K.-L. et al. Pathogenic germline variants in 10,389 adult cancers. Cell 173, 355–370 (2018).
pubmed: 29625052
pmcid: 5949147
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.039
Polak, P. et al. A mutational signature reveals alterations underlying deficient homologous recombination repair in breast cancer. Nat. Genet. 49, 1476–1486 (2017).
pubmed: 28825726
pmcid: 7376751
doi: 10.1038/ng.3934
Larotrectinib OK’d for cancers with TRK fusions. Cancer Discov. 9, 8–9 (2019).
Yizhak, K. et al. RNA sequence analysis reveals macroscopic somatic clonal expansion across normal tissues. Science 364, eaaw0726 (2019).
Van Hoeck, A., Tjoonk, N. H., van Boxtel, R. & Cuppen, E. Portrait of a cancer: mutational signature analyses for cancer diagnostics. BMC Cancer 19, 457 (2019).
pubmed: 31092228
pmcid: 6521503
doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5677-2
Barretina, J. et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia—using preclinical models to predict anticancer drug sensitivity. Eur. J. Cancer 48, S5–S6 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(12)70726-8
Tsherniak, A. et al. Defining a cancer dependency map. Cell 170, 564–576 (2017).
pubmed: 28753430
pmcid: 5667678
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.010
Sinha, R., Schultz, N. & Sander, C. Comparing cancer cell lines and tumor samples by genomic profiles. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/028159 (2015).
Najgebauer, H. et al. CELLector: genomics-guided selection of cancer in vitro models. Cell Syst. 10, 424–432 (2020).
pubmed: 32437684
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.04.007
Warren, A. et al. Global computational alignment of tumor and cell line transcriptional profiles. Nat. Commun. 12, 22 (2021).
pubmed: 33397959
pmcid: 7782593
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20294-x
Chang, M. T. et al. Accelerating discovery of functional mutant alleles in cancer. Cancer Discov. 8, 174–183 (2018).
pubmed: 29247016
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0321
Babaei, S., Akhtar, W., de Jong, J., Reinders, M. & de Ridder, J. 3D hotspots of recurrent retroviral insertions reveal long-range interactions with cancer genes. Nat. Commun. 6, 6381 (2015).
pubmed: 25721899
doi: 10.1038/ncomms7381
Gao, J. et al. 3D clusters of somatic mutations in cancer reveal numerous rare mutations as functional targets. Genome Med. 9, 4 (2017).
pubmed: 28115009
pmcid: 5260099
doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0393-x
Sondka, Z. et al. The COSMIC Cancer Gene Census: describing genetic dysfunction across all human cancers. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 696–705 (2018).
pubmed: 30293088
pmcid: 6450507
doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0060-1
Liberzon, A. et al. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425 (2015).
pubmed: 26771021
pmcid: 4707969
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004
Tate, J. G. et al. COSMIC: the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D941–D947 (2019).
pubmed: 30371878
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1015
Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D1062–D1067 (2018).
pubmed: 29165669
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1153
Karczewski, K. J. et al. The ExAC browser: displaying reference data information from over 60 000 exomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D840–D845 (2017).
pubmed: 27899611
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw971
Van Allen, E. M. et al. Genomic correlates of response to CTLA-4 blockade in metastatic melanoma. Science 350, 207–211 (2015).
pubmed: 26359337
pmcid: 5054517
doi: 10.1126/science.aad0095
Robinson, D. et al. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell 161, 1215–1228 (2015).
pubmed: 26000489
pmcid: 4484602
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.001
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of papillary renal-cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 135–145 (2016).
Perry, J. A. et al. Complementary genomic approaches highlight the PI3K/mTOR pathway as a common vulnerability in osteosarcoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5564–E5573 (2014).
pubmed: 25512523
pmcid: 4280630
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419260111
Bielski, C. M. et al. Genome doubling shapes the evolution and prognosis of advanced cancers. Nat. Genet. 50, 1189–1195 (2018).
pubmed: 30013179
pmcid: 6072608
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0165-1
Alexandrov, L. B., Nik-Zainal, S., Siu, H. C., Leung, S. Y. & Stratton, M. R. A mutational signature in gastric cancer suggests therapeutic strategies. Nat. Commun. 6, 8683 (2015).
pubmed: 26511885
pmcid: 4918743
doi: 10.1038/ncomms9683
Sztupinszki, Z. et al. Detection of molecular signatures of homologous recombination deficiency in prostate cancer with or without BRCA1/2 mutations. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 2673–2680 (2020).
Chatterjee, P. et al. PARP inhibition sensitizes to low dose-rate radiation TMPRSS2–ERG fusion gene-expressing and PTEN-deficient prostate cancer cells. PLoS ONE 8, e60408 (2013).
pubmed: 23565244
pmcid: 3614551
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060408
Ghandi, M. et al. Next-generation characterization of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. Nature 569, 503–508 (2019).
pubmed: 31068700
pmcid: 6697103
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1186-3
Yang, W. et al. Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D955–D961 (2013).
pubmed: 23180760
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1111
Wang, B. et al. Similarity network fusion for aggregating data types on a genomic scale. Nat. Methods 11, 333–337 (2014).
pubmed: 24464287
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2810
Sicklick, J. K. et al. Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study. Nat. Med. 25, 744–750 (2019).
pubmed: 31011206
pmcid: 6553618
doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0407-5
Lindsay, J. et al. MatchMiner: an open source computational platform for real-time matching of cancer patients to precision medicine clinical trials using genomic and clinical criteria. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/199489 (2017).
Pallarz, S. et al. Comparative analysis of public knowledge bases for precision oncology. JCO Precis. Oncol. 3, PO.18.00371 (2019).
Pai, S. & Bader, G. D. Patient similarity networks for precision medicine. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 2924–2938 (2018).
pubmed: 29860027
pmcid: 6097926
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.05.037
Zitnik, M. et al. Machine learning for integrating data in biology and medicine: principles, practice, and opportunities. Inf. Fusion 50, 71–91 (2019).
pubmed: 30467459
doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2018.09.012
Kundra, R. et al. OncoTree: a cancer classification system for precision oncology. JCO Clin. Cancer Inform. 5, 221–230 (2021).
pubmed: 33625877
doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00108
Kalia, S. S. et al. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet. Med. 19, 249–255 (2017).
pubmed: 27854360
doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.190
Lawrence, M. S. et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 499, 214–218 (2013).
pubmed: 23770567
pmcid: 3919509
doi: 10.1038/nature12213
Rosenthal, R., McGranahan, N., Herrero, J., Taylor, B. S. & Swanton, C. DeconstructSigs: delineating mutational processes in single tumors distinguishes DNA repair deficiencies and patterns of carcinoma evolution. Genome Biol. 17, 31 (2016).
pubmed: 26899170
pmcid: 4762164
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0893-4
Alexandrov, L. B., Nik-Zainal, S., Wedge, D. C., Campbell, P. J. & Stratton, M. R. Deciphering signatures of mutational processes operative in human cancer. Cell Rep. 3, 246–259 (2013).
pubmed: 23318258
pmcid: 3588146
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.12.008
Salipante, S. J., Scroggins, S. M., Hampel, H. L., Turner, E. H. & Pritchard, C. C. Microsatellite instability detection by next generation sequencing. Clin. Chem. 60, 1192–1199 (2014).
pubmed: 24987110
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.223677
Maruvka, Y. E. et al. Analysis of somatic microsatellite indels identifies driver events in human tumors. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 951–959 (2017).
pubmed: 28892075
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3966
pmcid: 9123850
Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 213–219 (2013).
pubmed: 23396013
pmcid: 3833702
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2514
Saunders, C. T. et al. Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor–normal sample pairs. Bioinformatics 28, 1811–1817 (2012).
pubmed: 22581179
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts271
Poplin, R. et al. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 983–987 (2018).
pubmed: 30247488
doi: 10.1038/nbt.4235
Olshen, A. B., Venkatraman, E. S., Lucito, R. & Wigler, M. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 5, 557–572 (2004).
pubmed: 15475419
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh008
Shen, R., Olshen, A. B. & Ladanyi, M. Integrative clustering of multiple genomic data types using a joint latent variable model with application to breast and lung cancer subtype analysis. Bioinformatics 25, 2906–2912 (2009).
pubmed: 19759197
pmcid: 2800366
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp543
Shen, R. & Seshan, V. E. FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e131 (2016).
pubmed: 27270079
pmcid: 5027494
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw520
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
pubmed: 23104886
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Hass, B. et al. Accuracy assessment of fusion transcript detection via read-mapping and de novo fusion transcript assembly-based methods. Genome Biology 20, 213 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1842-9
Ramos, A. H. et al. Oncotator: cancer variant annotation tool. Hum. Mutat. 36, E2423–E2429 (2015).
pubmed: 25703262
pmcid: 7350419
doi: 10.1002/humu.22771
Reardon, B. & Van Allen, E. M. Molecular profile to cancer cell line matchmaking. Protocol Exchange https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.pex-1539/v1 (2021).