An individualized decision between physical therapy or surgery for patients with degenerative meniscal tears cannot be based on continuous treatment selection markers: a marker-by-treatment analysis of the ESCAPE study.
Exercise
Healthcare
Individualized
Knee
Meniscus
Orthopedics
Prediction
Rehabilitation
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
26
09
2021
accepted:
14
12
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2022
medline:
26
5
2022
entrez:
5
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Marker-by-treatment analyses are promising new methods in internal medicine, but have not yet been implemented in orthopaedics. With this analysis, specific cut-off points may be obtained, that can potentially identify whether meniscal surgery or physical therapy is the superior intervention for an individual patient. This study aimed to introduce a novel approach in orthopaedic research to identify relevant treatment selection markers that affect treatment outcome following meniscal surgery or physical therapy in patients with degenerative meniscal tears. Data were analysed from the ESCAPE trial, which assessed the treatment of patients over 45 years old with a degenerative meniscal tear. The treatment outcome of interest was a clinically relevant improvement on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form at 3, 12, and 24 months follow-up. Logistic regression models were developed to predict the outcome using baseline characteristics (markers), the treatment (meniscal surgery or physical therapy), and a marker-by-treatment interaction term. Interactions with p < 0.10 were considered as potential treatment selection markers and used these to develop predictiveness curves which provide thresholds to identify marker-based differences in clinical outcomes between the two treatments. Potential treatment selection markers included general physical health, pain during activities, knee function, BMI, and age. While some marker-based thresholds could be identified at 3, 12, and 24 months follow-up, none of the baseline characteristics were consistent markers at all three follow-up times. This novel in-depth analysis did not result in clear clinical subgroups of patients who are substantially more likely to benefit from either surgery or physical therapy. However, this study may serve as an exemplar for other orthopaedic trials to investigate the heterogeneity in treatment effect. It will help clinicians to quantify the additional benefit of one treatment over another at an individual level, based on the patient's baseline characteristics. II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35122496
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06851-x
pii: 10.1007/s00167-021-06851-x
pmc: PMC9165275
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1937-1948Subventions
Organisme : ReumaNederland
ID : 18-2-201
Organisme : Achmea
ID : Z436
Organisme : OLVG
ID : 15u.025
Organisme : ZonMw
ID : 837002009
Pays : Netherlands
Investigateurs
V A B Scholtes
(VAB)
E L A R Mutsaerts
(ELAR)
M R Krijnen
(MR)
D F P van Deurzen
(DFP)
D J F Moojen
(DJF)
C H Bloembergen
(CH)
A de Gast
(A)
T Snijders
(T)
J J Halma
(JJ)
D B F Saris
(DBF)
N Wolterbeek
(N)
C Neeter
(C)
G M M J Kerkhoffs
(GMMJ)
R W Peters
(RW)
I C J B van den Brand
(ICJB)
S de Vos-Jakobs
(S)
A B Spoor
(AB)
T Gosens
(T)
W Rezaie
(W)
D J Hofstee
(DJ)
B J Burger
(BJ)
D Haverkamp
(D)
A M J S Vervest
(AMJS)
T A van Rheenen
(TA)
A E Wijsbek
(AE)
E R A van Arkel
(ERA)
B J W Thomassen
(BJW)
S Sprague
(S)
B W J Mol
(BWJ)
M Schavemaker
(M)
J Wolkenfelt
(J)
M Teuwen
(M)
I K Butter
(IK)
M W van Tulder
(MW)
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 21;6(12):e014381
pubmed: 28003302
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):1567-73
pubmed: 16870824
BMJ. 2018 Dec 10;363:k4245
pubmed: 30530757
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;54(1):13-22
pubmed: 31186258
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):364-371
pubmed: 30608864
Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494-502
pubmed: 13498604
Hum Reprod Open. 2019 Jul 18;2019(3):hoz015
pubmed: 31334364
Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):74-80
pubmed: 33228479
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):52
pubmed: 29954372
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Jun;34(6):619-626
pubmed: 28434653
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jan;30(1):231-238
pubmed: 33550450
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77(2):159-161
pubmed: 28735281
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1565-70
pubmed: 23703915
Br J Sports Med. 2020 May;54(9):538-545
pubmed: 31227493
Trials. 2010 Aug 12;11:85
pubmed: 20704705
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1675-84
pubmed: 23506518
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Feb;21(2):358-64
pubmed: 22437659
J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;52(10):935-42
pubmed: 10513756
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1713-4
pubmed: 27115375
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1123-1129
pubmed: 28258326
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e031864
pubmed: 32152157
BMJ. 2016 Jul 20;354:i3740
pubmed: 27440192
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;54(6):354-359
pubmed: 31371339
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;47(10):2402-2411
pubmed: 31298923
BMJ. 2017 May 10;357:j1982
pubmed: 28490431
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Nov;22(11):1808-16
pubmed: 25086401
JAMA. 2018 Oct 2;320(13):1328-1337
pubmed: 30285177
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 15;154(4):253-9
pubmed: 21320940
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Nov 16;98(22):1890-1896
pubmed: 27852905
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1408-16
pubmed: 24618098
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2194-2202
pubmed: 30262336
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;54(11):652-663
pubmed: 30796103