Comparison of the fixation ability between lag screw and bone plate for oblique metacarpal shaft fracture.
Locked plate
Oblique metacarpal shaft fracture
Regular plate
Screw
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Feb 2022
05 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
30
12
2021
accepted:
24
01
2022
entrez:
6
2
2022
pubmed:
7
2
2022
medline:
23
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For oblique metacarpal shaft fracture, if anatomical reduction is achieved through conservative cast immobilization rather than stable fixation, bone malrotation can easily occur, resulting in severe loss in hand prehensile function. However, whether bone plate fixation or only lag screw fixation is more preferable remains unclear. Few studies have evaluated whether screw fixation can provide biomechanical fixation strength similar to bone plate fixation. We assessed the difference in fixation strength between fixtation with two lag screws and bone plate for oblique metacarpal shaft fractures. We created oblique metacarpal shaft fractures on 21 artificial bones and fixated them using (1) double lag screw (2LS group), (2) regular plate (RP group), or (3) locked plate (LP group). To obtain the force-displacement data, a cantilever bending test was conducted for each specimen through a material testing machine. One-way analysis of variance and a Tukey test were conducted to compare the maximum fracture force and stiffness of the three fixation methods. The maximum fracture force of the 2LS group (mean + SD: 153.6 ± 26.5 N) was significantly lower than that of the RP (211.6 ± 18.5 N) and LP (227.5 ± 10.0 N) groups (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were discovered between the RP and LP groups. The coefficient of variation for the maximum fracture force of the 2LS group (17.3%) was more than twice as high as that of the RP (8.7%) and LP (4.4%) groups. In addition, the stiffness of the three fixation methods was similar. Compared with bone plate fixation, double lag screw fixation yielded slightly lower maximum bearable fracture force but similar stiffness. Therefore, this technique could be used for treating oblique metacarpal shaft fractures. However, using double lag screw fixation alone is technically demanding and requires considerable surgical experiences to produce consistent results.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
For oblique metacarpal shaft fracture, if anatomical reduction is achieved through conservative cast immobilization rather than stable fixation, bone malrotation can easily occur, resulting in severe loss in hand prehensile function. However, whether bone plate fixation or only lag screw fixation is more preferable remains unclear. Few studies have evaluated whether screw fixation can provide biomechanical fixation strength similar to bone plate fixation.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
We assessed the difference in fixation strength between fixtation with two lag screws and bone plate for oblique metacarpal shaft fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
We created oblique metacarpal shaft fractures on 21 artificial bones and fixated them using (1) double lag screw (2LS group), (2) regular plate (RP group), or (3) locked plate (LP group). To obtain the force-displacement data, a cantilever bending test was conducted for each specimen through a material testing machine. One-way analysis of variance and a Tukey test were conducted to compare the maximum fracture force and stiffness of the three fixation methods.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The maximum fracture force of the 2LS group (mean + SD: 153.6 ± 26.5 N) was significantly lower than that of the RP (211.6 ± 18.5 N) and LP (227.5 ± 10.0 N) groups (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were discovered between the RP and LP groups. The coefficient of variation for the maximum fracture force of the 2LS group (17.3%) was more than twice as high as that of the RP (8.7%) and LP (4.4%) groups. In addition, the stiffness of the three fixation methods was similar.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with bone plate fixation, double lag screw fixation yielded slightly lower maximum bearable fracture force but similar stiffness. Therefore, this technique could be used for treating oblique metacarpal shaft fractures. However, using double lag screw fixation alone is technically demanding and requires considerable surgical experiences to produce consistent results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35123532
doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02963-3
pii: 10.1186/s13018-022-02963-3
pmc: PMC8817463
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
72Subventions
Organisme : China Medical University, Taiwan
ID : CMU110-S-05
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Hand (N Y). 2019 Jan;14(1):27-33
pubmed: 30192648
J Hand Surg Br. 1990 Feb;15(1):124-5
pubmed: 2307874
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jun;58(4):487-92
pubmed: 1270466
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 7;22(1):335
pubmed: 33827523
J Hand Surg Am. 1982 May;7(3):264-70
pubmed: 7086094
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Oct 1;100(39):e27375
pubmed: 34596154
Orthop Surg. 2015 Aug;7(3):256-60
pubmed: 26311101
J Trauma. 1971 May;11(5):381-9
pubmed: 5091695
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 5;22(1):146
pubmed: 33546670
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 May 10;22(1):431
pubmed: 33971840
J Hand Surg Am. 1984 Mar;9(2):216-21
pubmed: 6715828
Hand (N Y). 2013 Dec;8(4):454-9
pubmed: 24426966
Hand Clin. 2006 Aug;22(3):287-95
pubmed: 16843795
J Hand Surg Br. 1995 Oct;20(5):609-13
pubmed: 8543865
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Dec;124(10):675-80
pubmed: 15602676
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Feb;22(2):111-20
pubmed: 24486757
Hand (N Y). 2008 Dec;3(4):311-5
pubmed: 18780019
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jul 7;16(1):441
pubmed: 34233702
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Apr;40-A(2):375-83
pubmed: 13539061
J Hand Surg Am. 1985 Jul;10(4):466-72
pubmed: 4020056
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jul 25;13(1):183
pubmed: 30045774
Clin Plast Surg. 2019 Jul;46(3):415-423
pubmed: 31103086
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Jul;21(4):279-84
pubmed: 26374415