Exploring Access to Mental Health and Primary Care Services for People With Severe Mental Illness During the COVID-19 Restrictions.
COVID-19
bipolar disorder
health services
mental health services
schizoaffecfive disorder
schizophrenia
severe mental ill health
Journal
Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
22
10
2021
accepted:
14
12
2021
entrez:
7
2
2022
pubmed:
8
2
2022
medline:
8
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To explore: how satisfied people with severe mental illness (SMI) are with the support received during the pandemic; understand any difficulties encountered when accessing both mental health and primary care services; consider ways to mitigate these difficulties; and assess the perceived need for future support from mental health services. A representative sample was drawn from a large transdiagnostic clinical cohort of people with SMI, which was recruited between April 2016 and March 2020. The sample was re-surveyed a few months after the beginning of the restrictions. Descriptive frequency statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data. The free text responses were analyzed thematically. 367 participants responded to the survey. Two thirds were receiving support from mental health services with the rest supported in primary care or self-managing. A quarter thought they would need more mental health support in the coming year. Half had needed to used community mental health services during the pandemic and the majority had been able to get support. A minority reported that their mental health had deteriorated but they had either not got the supported they wanted or had not sought help. The biggest service change was the reduction in face-to-face appointments and increasing use of phone and video call support. Nearly half of those using mental health services found this change acceptable or even preferred it. However, acceptability was influenced by several factors, and participants were more likely to report that they had received all the support they needed, when seen in person. Although most participants were satisfied with the mental health support they had received, a minority were not. This, couple with findings on future need for mental health support has implications for post pandemic demand on services. Remote care has brought benefits but also risks that it could increase inequalities in access to services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35126210
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.799885
pmc: PMC8814571
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
799885Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/V028529/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Newbronner, Spanakis, Wadman, Crosland, Heron, Johnston, Walker, Gilbody and Peckham.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;4(4):295-301
pubmed: 28237639
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 22;11(4):e049210
pubmed: 33888531
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;72(4):334-41
pubmed: 25671328
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;56(1):13-24
pubmed: 32804258
J Ment Health. 2021 Jul 29;:1-8
pubmed: 34323635
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):463
pubmed: 32380007
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;56(1):25-37
pubmed: 32857218
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;56(8):1447-1457
pubmed: 33665680
BMJ. 2020 Mar 12;368:m998
pubmed: 32165352
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 16;16(9):e0257270
pubmed: 34529705
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19590
pubmed: 21611123