Effect of training on resident inter-reader agreement with American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.

American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Inter-reader agreement Thyroid Thyroid nodule Ultrasound

Journal

World journal of radiology
ISSN: 1949-8470
Titre abrégé: World J Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101538184

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 12 10 2021
revised: 21 12 2021
accepted: 11 01 2022
entrez: 7 2 2022
pubmed: 8 2 2022
medline: 8 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) was introduced to standardize the ultrasound characterization of thyroid nodules. Studies have shown that ACR-TIRADS reduces unnecessary biopsies and improves consistency of imaging recommendations. Despite its widespread adoption, there are few studies to date assessing the inter-reader agreement amongst radiology trainees with limited ultrasound experience. We hypothesize that in PGY-4 radiology residents with no prior exposure to ACR TI-RADS, a statistically significant improvement in inter-reader reliability can be achieved with a one hour training session. To evaluate the inter-reader agreement of radiology residents in using ACR TI-RADS before and after training. A single center retrospective cohort study evaluating 50 thyroid nodules in 40 patients of varying TI-RADS levels was performed. Reference standard TI-RADS scores were established through a consensus panel of three fellowship-trained staff radiologists with between 1 and 14 years of clinical experience each. Three PGY-4 radiology residents (trainees) were selected as blinded readers for this study. Each trainee had between 4 to 5 mo of designated ultrasound training. No trainee had received specialized TI-RADS training prior to this study. Each of the readers independently reviewed the 50 testing cases and assigned a TI-RADS score to each case before and after TI-RADS training performed 6 wk apart. Fleiss kappa was used to measure the pooled inter-reader agreement. The relative diagnostic performance of readers, pre- and post-training, when compared against the reference standard. There were 33 females and 7 males with a mean age of 56.6 ± 13.6 years. The mean nodule size was 19 ± 14 mm (range from 5 to 63 mm). A statistically significant superior inter-reader agreement was found on the post-training assessment compared to the pre-training assessment for the following variables: 1. "Shape" (k of 0.09 [slight] pre-training Statistically significant improvement in inter-reader agreement in the assigning TI-RADS level and recommendations after training is observed. Our study supports the use of dedicated ACR TI-RADS training in radiology residents.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) was introduced to standardize the ultrasound characterization of thyroid nodules. Studies have shown that ACR-TIRADS reduces unnecessary biopsies and improves consistency of imaging recommendations. Despite its widespread adoption, there are few studies to date assessing the inter-reader agreement amongst radiology trainees with limited ultrasound experience. We hypothesize that in PGY-4 radiology residents with no prior exposure to ACR TI-RADS, a statistically significant improvement in inter-reader reliability can be achieved with a one hour training session.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the inter-reader agreement of radiology residents in using ACR TI-RADS before and after training.
METHODS METHODS
A single center retrospective cohort study evaluating 50 thyroid nodules in 40 patients of varying TI-RADS levels was performed. Reference standard TI-RADS scores were established through a consensus panel of three fellowship-trained staff radiologists with between 1 and 14 years of clinical experience each. Three PGY-4 radiology residents (trainees) were selected as blinded readers for this study. Each trainee had between 4 to 5 mo of designated ultrasound training. No trainee had received specialized TI-RADS training prior to this study. Each of the readers independently reviewed the 50 testing cases and assigned a TI-RADS score to each case before and after TI-RADS training performed 6 wk apart. Fleiss kappa was used to measure the pooled inter-reader agreement. The relative diagnostic performance of readers, pre- and post-training, when compared against the reference standard.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 33 females and 7 males with a mean age of 56.6 ± 13.6 years. The mean nodule size was 19 ± 14 mm (range from 5 to 63 mm). A statistically significant superior inter-reader agreement was found on the post-training assessment compared to the pre-training assessment for the following variables: 1. "Shape" (k of 0.09 [slight] pre-training
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Statistically significant improvement in inter-reader agreement in the assigning TI-RADS level and recommendations after training is observed. Our study supports the use of dedicated ACR TI-RADS training in radiology residents.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35126875
doi: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i1.19
pmc: PMC8788165
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

19-29

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Références

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
Endocrine. 2020 Mar;67(3):643-650
pubmed: 31919768
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May;214(5):1152-1157
pubmed: 32097031
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Oct;46(10):4967-4973
pubmed: 34185128
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jan;216(1):38-47
pubmed: 32603229
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Aug;76(4):609-637
pubmed: 29795880
Endocrine. 2020 Jan;67(1):143-154
pubmed: 31741167
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jul;211(1):162-167
pubmed: 29702015
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 28;173(19):1788-96
pubmed: 23978950
JAMA. 2017 Apr 4;317(13):1338-1348
pubmed: 28362912
Endocr Pract. 2016 May;22(5):622-39
pubmed: 27167915
Radiology. 2018 Jun;287(3):893-900
pubmed: 29465333
Endocr Connect. 2018 Jan;7(1):1-7
pubmed: 29196301
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5):587-595
pubmed: 28372962

Auteurs

Yang Du (Y)

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada. yang.du@usask.ca.

Meredith Bara (M)

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada.

Prayash Katlariwala (P)

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada.

Roger Croutze (R)

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada.

Katrin Resch (K)

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada.

Jonathan Porter (J)

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada.

Medica Sam (M)

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada.

Mitchell P Wilson (MP)

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada.

Gavin Low (G)

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada.

Classifications MeSH