Morphometry of two cryptic tree frog species at their hybrid zone reveals neither intermediate nor transgressive morphotypes.
Hyla arborea group
Hylidae
amphibians
hybrid zones
hybridization
morphometics
transgressive phenotypes
transgressive segregation
Journal
Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
08
12
2021
accepted:
17
12
2021
entrez:
7
2
2022
pubmed:
8
2
2022
medline:
8
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Under incomplete reproductive isolation, secondary contact of diverged allopatric lineages may lead to the formation of hybrid zones that allow to study recombinants over several generations as excellent systems of genomic interactions resulting from the evolutionary forces acting on certain genes and phenotypes. Hybrid phenotypes may either exhibit intermediacy or, alternatively, transgressive traits, which exceed the extremes of their parents due to epistasis and segregation of complementary alleles. While transgressive morphotypes have been examined in fish, reptiles, birds, and mammals, studies in amphibians are rare. Here, we associate microsatellite-based genotypes with morphometrics-based morphotypes of two tree frog species of the
Identifiants
pubmed: 35127036
doi: 10.1002/ece3.8527
pii: ECE38527
pmc: PMC8794711
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.mkkwh7122']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e8527Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None.
Références
Mol Ecol. 2016 Sep;25(17):4285-300
pubmed: 27220555
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0199113
pubmed: 29902247
Mol Ecol. 2013 Nov;22(22):5669-84
pubmed: 24102652
Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):2099-104
pubmed: 9691061
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2019 May;134:291-299
pubmed: 30776435
Evolution. 2005 Mar;59(3):686-90
pubmed: 15856710
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 02;6:22601
pubmed: 26932675
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 12;6:21029
pubmed: 26868373
Evolution. 1987 Jan;41(1):157-165
pubmed: 28563751
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Jun;55(3):1146-66
pubmed: 20307673
Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Sep;8(5):1095-7
pubmed: 21585982
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Nov 26;7:850
pubmed: 25430653
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 22;107(25):11447-52
pubmed: 20534512
Mol Ecol. 2011 Aug;20(16):3381-98
pubmed: 21749513
Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
pubmed: 10835412
Genet Res. 1994 Aug;64(1):51-6
pubmed: 7958831
Mol Ecol. 2003 Jul;12(7):1913-30
pubmed: 12803641
Ecol Lett. 2018 Feb;21(2):264-274
pubmed: 29243294
Mol Ecol. 2018 Feb;27(3):613-635
pubmed: 29334414
PLoS Biol. 2011 May;9(5):e1001062
pubmed: 21629756
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Dec 04;9:283
pubmed: 19961584
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Mar 22;275(1635):735-44
pubmed: 18211878
Evolution. 2014 Jan;68(1):204-15
pubmed: 24372605
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Jul;14(4):716-25
pubmed: 24345298
Sex Dev. 2013;7(5):261-6
pubmed: 23735903
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 29;358(1434):1141-7
pubmed: 12831480
Evolution. 2013 Aug;67(8):2434-40
pubmed: 23888863
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Dec;49(3):1019-24
pubmed: 18814852
Mol Ecol. 2000 Nov;9(11):1944-6
pubmed: 11091343
Curr Biol. 2016 Feb 22;26(4):490-5
pubmed: 26804556
Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 Jul 1;7(4):574-578
pubmed: 18784791
J Hered. 2014 Mar-Apr;105(2):226-36
pubmed: 24381182
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Aug 26;5(11):2219-27
pubmed: 26311650
Mol Ecol. 2021 Feb;30(4):987-1004
pubmed: 33338297
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Oct;65(1):1-9
pubmed: 22652054
J Evol Biol. 2013 Feb;26(2):229-46
pubmed: 23323997
Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1567-87
pubmed: 12930761
Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Oct;83 ( Pt 4):363-72
pubmed: 10583537
Mol Ecol. 2016 Jun;25(11):2337-60
pubmed: 26836441