Conservative management of intravesical erosion of a synthetic mid-urethral sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, based on patient preference: A case report.

Bladder Erosion Mesh Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT)

Journal

Case reports in women's health
ISSN: 2214-9112
Titre abrégé: Case Rep Womens Health
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101682122

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 17 12 2021
revised: 08 01 2022
accepted: 10 01 2022
entrez: 7 2 2022
pubmed: 8 2 2022
medline: 8 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Intravesical mesh erosion is an uncommon late complication of placement of a synthetic mid-urethral sling (MUS) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, and only a few cases have been reported. Optimal management remains controversial, though there is a tendency toward surgical removal through a variety of routes. However, surgical removal comes with its own risks and is not necessarily associated with an improvement in symptoms. We, herein present the first case of a conservatively managed intravesical mesh erosion following MUS placement. Nine years after insertion of a tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), a patient presented with persistent lower abdominal pain and dysuria. Flexible cystoscopy demonstrated an erosion of the tape through the bladder wall. The patient declined surgical intervention at the time. Therefore, she was commenced on regular methenamine hippurate and vaginal oestrogen, and kept under surveillance with regular cystoscopies. Her symptoms responded to this treatment and 6 years later remained well controlled on this regime. This case demonstrates that conservative management may be a safe and appropriate option for patients who decline surgical excision of mesh erosion.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Intravesical mesh erosion is an uncommon late complication of placement of a synthetic mid-urethral sling (MUS) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, and only a few cases have been reported. Optimal management remains controversial, though there is a tendency toward surgical removal through a variety of routes. However, surgical removal comes with its own risks and is not necessarily associated with an improvement in symptoms. We, herein present the first case of a conservatively managed intravesical mesh erosion following MUS placement.
CASE METHODS
Nine years after insertion of a tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), a patient presented with persistent lower abdominal pain and dysuria. Flexible cystoscopy demonstrated an erosion of the tape through the bladder wall. The patient declined surgical intervention at the time. Therefore, she was commenced on regular methenamine hippurate and vaginal oestrogen, and kept under surveillance with regular cystoscopies. Her symptoms responded to this treatment and 6 years later remained well controlled on this regime.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This case demonstrates that conservative management may be a safe and appropriate option for patients who decline surgical excision of mesh erosion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35127457
doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00383
pii: S2214-9112(22)00003-0
pmc: PMC8810362
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

e00383

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Références

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):383-5
pubmed: 20417432
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7:CD006375
pubmed: 28756647
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Jan;31(1):45-53
pubmed: 31468095
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jul;19(7):999-1006
pubmed: 18202812
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jun;20(6):731-3
pubmed: 18815720
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1252-1261
pubmed: 27604964
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1171-81
pubmed: 17698123
BJOG. 2021 Nov;128(12):2034-2043
pubmed: 34047446
J Urol. 2009 May;181(5):2198-202; discussion 2203
pubmed: 19296973
Korean J Urol. 2011 Dec;52(12):829-34
pubmed: 22216395
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Mar;40(3):862-4
pubmed: 24738130
BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108(9):1472-8
pubmed: 21231987
J Urol. 2019 Aug;202(2):339-346
pubmed: 30958736
BJU Int. 2008 Aug 5;102(5):582-5
pubmed: 18485041
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):81-5; discussion 85-6
pubmed: 8798092
Urology. 2017 Apr;102:247-251
pubmed: 27871826
Urology. 2017 Aug;106:203-209
pubmed: 28476681
Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):288-308
pubmed: 18031923
Menopause. 2021 Mar 15;28(6):706-716
pubmed: 33739315
BJOG. 2001 Jul;108(7):763-5
pubmed: 11467707

Auteurs

M O'Kane (M)

Department of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

G Araklitis (G)

Department of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

A Rantell (A)

Department of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

D Robinson (D)

Department of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

L Cardozo (L)

Department of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH