Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study.
Laparoscopy
female urogenital disease
pelvic organ prolapse
quality of life
urinary incontinence
Journal
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
ISSN: 1364-6893
Titre abrégé: J Obstet Gynaecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8309140
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
8
2
2022
medline:
30
9
2022
entrez:
7
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This retrospective surgical clinical study compares clinical and functional effects of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and laparoscopic pelvic organ prolapse suspension (L-POPS) for anterior and central prolapse correction. Thirty patients enrolled were affected by a symptomatic vaginal central compartment stage 2-3 prolapse and vaginal anterior compartment stage 1-3 prolapse without vaginal posterior compartment prolapse. A successful correction of anterior and central compartments prolapse without relapses were observed in both groups (LSC group versus L-POPS group). In patients who underwent L-POPS, a
Identifiants
pubmed: 35129036
doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.2021508
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM