Patients' and Providers' Perspectives on and Needs of Telemonitoring to Support Clinical Management and Self-care of People at High Risk for Preeclampsia: Qualitative Study.
blood pressure
high-risk pregnancy
home monitoring
mHealth
preeclampsia
telemonitoring
Journal
JMIR human factors
ISSN: 2292-9495
Titre abrégé: JMIR Hum Factors
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666561
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Feb 2022
07 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
02
08
2021
accepted:
28
11
2021
revised:
24
11
2021
entrez:
7
2
2022
pubmed:
8
2
2022
medline:
8
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Preeclampsia is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality worldwide, with a global prevalence at 2%-8% of pregnancies. Patients at high risk for preeclampsia (PHRPE) have an increased risk of complications, such as fetal growth restriction, preterm delivery, abnormal clotting, and liver and kidney disease. Telemonitoring for PHRPE may allow for timelier diagnosis and enhanced management, which may improve maternal and perinatal outcomes. The objective of this study is to determine the perceptions and needs of PHRPE and their health care providers with respect to telemonitoring through semistructured interviews with both groups. This study explored (1) what the needs and challenges of monitoring PHRPE are during pregnancy and in the postpartum period and (2) what features are required in a telemonitoring program to support self-care and clinical management of PHRPE. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach, and thematic analysis was conducted. PHRPE and health care providers from a high-risk obstetrical clinic in a large academic hospital in Toronto, Canada, were asked to participate in individual semistructured interviews. Two researchers jointly developed a coding framework and separately coded each interview to ensure that the interviews were double-coded. The software program NVivo version 12 was used to help organize the codes. In total, 7 PHRPE and 5 health care providers, which included a nurse practitioner and physicians, participated in the semistructured interviews. Using thematic analysis, perceptions on the benefits, barriers, and desired features were determined. Perceived benefits of telemonitoring for PHRPE included close monitoring of home blood pressure (BP) measurements and appropriate interventions for abnormal BP readings; the development of a tailored telemonitoring system for pregnant patients; and facilitation of self-management. Perceived barriers to telemonitoring for PHRPE included financial and personal barriers, as well as the potential for increased clinician workload. Desired features of a secure platform for PHRPE included the facilitation of self-management for patients and decision making for clinicians, as well as the inclusion of evidence-based action prompts. The perceptions of patients and providers on the use of telemonitoring for PHRPE support the need for a telemonitoring program for the management of PHRPE. Recommendations from this study include the specific features of a telemonitoring program for PHRPE, as well as the use of frameworks and design processes in the design and implementation of a telemonitoring program for PHRPE.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Preeclampsia is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality worldwide, with a global prevalence at 2%-8% of pregnancies. Patients at high risk for preeclampsia (PHRPE) have an increased risk of complications, such as fetal growth restriction, preterm delivery, abnormal clotting, and liver and kidney disease. Telemonitoring for PHRPE may allow for timelier diagnosis and enhanced management, which may improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to determine the perceptions and needs of PHRPE and their health care providers with respect to telemonitoring through semistructured interviews with both groups. This study explored (1) what the needs and challenges of monitoring PHRPE are during pregnancy and in the postpartum period and (2) what features are required in a telemonitoring program to support self-care and clinical management of PHRPE.
METHODS
METHODS
This study used a qualitative descriptive approach, and thematic analysis was conducted. PHRPE and health care providers from a high-risk obstetrical clinic in a large academic hospital in Toronto, Canada, were asked to participate in individual semistructured interviews. Two researchers jointly developed a coding framework and separately coded each interview to ensure that the interviews were double-coded. The software program NVivo version 12 was used to help organize the codes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 7 PHRPE and 5 health care providers, which included a nurse practitioner and physicians, participated in the semistructured interviews. Using thematic analysis, perceptions on the benefits, barriers, and desired features were determined. Perceived benefits of telemonitoring for PHRPE included close monitoring of home blood pressure (BP) measurements and appropriate interventions for abnormal BP readings; the development of a tailored telemonitoring system for pregnant patients; and facilitation of self-management. Perceived barriers to telemonitoring for PHRPE included financial and personal barriers, as well as the potential for increased clinician workload. Desired features of a secure platform for PHRPE included the facilitation of self-management for patients and decision making for clinicians, as well as the inclusion of evidence-based action prompts.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The perceptions of patients and providers on the use of telemonitoring for PHRPE support the need for a telemonitoring program for the management of PHRPE. Recommendations from this study include the specific features of a telemonitoring program for PHRPE, as well as the use of frameworks and design processes in the design and implementation of a telemonitoring program for PHRPE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35129445
pii: v9i1e32545
doi: 10.2196/32545
pmc: PMC8861860
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e32545Informations de copyright
©Maria Aquino, Janessa Griffith, Tessy Vattaparambil, Sarah Munce, Michelle Hladunewich, Emily Seto. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 07.02.2022.
Références
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):843-851
pubmed: 27745684
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 17;8(4):e15095
pubmed: 32301744
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Feb;99(2):210-9
pubmed: 26341941
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 May;36(5):416-41
pubmed: 24927294
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):427
pubmed: 29258469
Am J Hypertens. 2008 May;21(5):521-6
pubmed: 18437143
Health Informatics J. 2011 Dec;17(4):247-55
pubmed: 22193825
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1122-1131
pubmed: 24150027
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Dec 20;5:153
pubmed: 31890265
J Med Life. 2019 Jul-Sep;12(3):203-214
pubmed: 31666818
Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1066-1074
pubmed: 16581405
BMJ. 2007 Nov 10;335(7627):974
pubmed: 17975258
BMJ. 2005 Mar 12;330(7491):565
pubmed: 15743856
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2014 Jan;41(1):16-21
pubmed: 23651133
Transl Behav Med. 2013 Sep;3(3):271-6
pubmed: 24073178
J Rural Health. 2014 Winter;30(1):69-78
pubmed: 24383486
Semin Perinatol. 2009 Jun;33(3):130-7
pubmed: 19464502
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 1;10(12):e037874
pubmed: 33262186
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;97(4):533-8
pubmed: 11275024