The Woven EndoBridge Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Initial Clinical Experience within an Australian Population.
Endovascular procedures
Flow diversion
Intracranial aneurysm
Intrasaccular
WEB
Woven EndoBridge device
Journal
Neurointervention
ISSN: 2093-9043
Titre abrégé: Neurointervention
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101561462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
15
09
2021
accepted:
16
01
2022
pubmed:
9
2
2022
medline:
9
2
2022
entrez:
8
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Advances in endovascular technology have expanded the treatment options for intracranial aneurysms. Intrasaccular flow diversion is a relatively new technique that aims to disrupt blood inflow at the neck of the aneurysm, hence promoting intrasaccular thrombosis. The Woven EndoBridge device (WEB; MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) is an US Food and Drug Administration approved intrasaccular flow diverter for wide-necked aneurysms. We report the early interim clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with both ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) treated using the WEB device in an Australian population. A retrospective analysis was done of patients with ruptured or unruptured IAs who received treatment with WEB across 5 Australian neuroendovascular referral centers between May 2017 and November 2020. Angiographic occlusion was assessed with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Complications were recorded and clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale at follow-up. In total, 66 aneurysms were treated in 63 patients, with successful deployment of the WEB device in 98.5% (n=65). Eighteen (26.9%) ruptured aneurysms were included. Failure of deployment occurred in a single case. Adjunct coiling and/or stenting was performed in 20.9% (n=14) cases. Sixty-two patients with 65 aneurysms using a WEB device were followed up (mean=9.1 months), and 89.4% of these had complete aneurysm occlusion while 1.5% remained patent. Functional independence was achieved in 93.5% of cases. Early results following the use of WEB devices in Australia demonstrate safety and adequate aneurysm occlusion comparable to international literature.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35130672
pii: neuroint.2021.00430
doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2021.00430
pmc: PMC8891585
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
28-36Références
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Jun;10(6):553-559
pubmed: 28965106
Radiology. 2009 Jun;251(3):846-55
pubmed: 19318586
Radiology. 2010 Sep;256(3):916-23
pubmed: 20720074
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jul;10(7):626-36
pubmed: 21641282
World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;136:e1-e23
pubmed: 31419591
Neurosurgery. 2020 Aug 1;87(2):357-367
pubmed: 31960052
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 May;12(5):512-520
pubmed: 32005760
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Sep;37(9):1700-5
pubmed: 27256850
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Sep;42(9):1627-1632
pubmed: 34117016
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;30(2):297-304
pubmed: 30734053
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Jul;7(7):496-502
pubmed: 24898735
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Dec;37(12):2287-2292
pubmed: 27516237
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jun;8(6):615-20
pubmed: 25999378
Neurointervention. 2021 Nov;16(3):211-221
pubmed: 34674453
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 May;13(5):443-446
pubmed: 32719167
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Sep;37(9):1684-9
pubmed: 27102311
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Apr;9(4):411-417
pubmed: 27075486
J Stroke. 2018 Jan;20(1):46-56
pubmed: 29402066
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Feb;26(1):61-67
pubmed: 31690151
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Sep;11(9):924-930
pubmed: 30992395
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Apr;35(4):698-705
pubmed: 24184523
Lancet. 2005 Sep 3-9;366(9488):809-17
pubmed: 16139655
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Dec;9(12):1191-1196
pubmed: 28096478
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Nov;13(11):1012-1016
pubmed: 33483455
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Jul;8(7):635-42
pubmed: 19501022