The Last Beat: Contemporary Ethical Controversies Surrounding Determination of Cardiopulmonary Death.
CPR
autoresuscitation
circulatory death
determination of death
Journal
Chest
ISSN: 1931-3543
Titre abrégé: Chest
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0231335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
21
06
2021
revised:
09
08
2021
accepted:
16
08
2021
entrez:
8
2
2022
pubmed:
9
2
2022
medline:
11
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Part one of this series tracked the evolution of the death examination, noting its stability over the last century despite changing diagnostic and therapeutic technologies and social contexts. In part two, we discuss the practical and ethical debates surrounding the exact timing of death. Although the irreversible cessation of cardiopulmonary systems remains the most common criteria used for the determination of death, identification of the moment of irreversibility is imprecise. In most cases, this imprecision is not problematic, but, when the cessation of circulation is used to identify the time of organ procurement for transplantation, it becomes critical. The phenomenon of autoresuscitation highlights these issues because patients who meet all the criteria for circulatory death (sometimes for periods of observation well beyond the norm) apparently return to life. Were these patients resurrected (like Lazarus) or did we simply not wait long enough?
Identifiants
pubmed: 35131058
pii: S0012-3692(21)03836-8
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.064
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
519-523Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Inc.