Reuse of Personal Protective Equipment: Results of a Human Factors Study Using Fluorescence to Identify Self-Contamination During Donning and Doffing.
PPE
PPE reuse
doffing
donning
occupational risks
personal protective equipment
Journal
The Journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 0736-4679
Titre abrégé: J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8412174
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
received:
02
09
2021
revised:
14
12
2021
accepted:
23
12
2021
pubmed:
9
2
2022
medline:
31
3
2022
entrez:
8
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
At least 115,000 health and care workers (HCWs) are estimated to have lost their lives to COVID-19, according to the the chief of the World Health Organization (WHO). Personal protective equipment (PPE) is the first line of defense for HCWs against infectious diseases. At the height of the pandemic, PPE supplies became scarce, necessitating reuse, which increased the occupational COVID-19 risks to HCWs. Currently, there are few robust studies addressing PPE reuse and practice variability, leaving HCWs vulnerable to accidental contamination and harm. The objective of this study was to assess potential HCW contamination during PPE donning, doffing, and reuse. The study included 28 active acute care physicians, nurses, and nurse practitioners that evaluated 5 simulated patients with COVID-like symptoms while donning and doffing PPE between each patient encounter. An N95 mask was contaminated with a transparent fluorescent gel applied to the outside of the N95 mask to simulate contamination that might occur during reuse. Participants were evaluated after PPE doffing for each encounter using a black light to assess for face and body contamination. All participants had multiple sites of contamination, predominantly on their head and neck. None of the participants were able to don and doff PPE without contaminating themselves during five consecutive simulation cycles. The current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention PPE guidelines for donning and doffing fall short in protecting HCWs. They do not adequately protect HCWs from contamination. There is an urgent need for PPE and workflow redesign.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
At least 115,000 health and care workers (HCWs) are estimated to have lost their lives to COVID-19, according to the the chief of the World Health Organization (WHO). Personal protective equipment (PPE) is the first line of defense for HCWs against infectious diseases. At the height of the pandemic, PPE supplies became scarce, necessitating reuse, which increased the occupational COVID-19 risks to HCWs. Currently, there are few robust studies addressing PPE reuse and practice variability, leaving HCWs vulnerable to accidental contamination and harm.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to assess potential HCW contamination during PPE donning, doffing, and reuse.
METHODS
The study included 28 active acute care physicians, nurses, and nurse practitioners that evaluated 5 simulated patients with COVID-like symptoms while donning and doffing PPE between each patient encounter. An N95 mask was contaminated with a transparent fluorescent gel applied to the outside of the N95 mask to simulate contamination that might occur during reuse. Participants were evaluated after PPE doffing for each encounter using a black light to assess for face and body contamination.
RESULTS
All participants had multiple sites of contamination, predominantly on their head and neck. None of the participants were able to don and doff PPE without contaminating themselves during five consecutive simulation cycles.
CONCLUSIONS
The current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention PPE guidelines for donning and doffing fall short in protecting HCWs. They do not adequately protect HCWs from contamination. There is an urgent need for PPE and workflow redesign.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35131132
pii: S0736-4679(21)01058-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.12.010
pmc: PMC8814906
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
337-341Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76(1):134-135
pubmed: 32638351
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1904-10
pubmed: 26457544
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jul 6;14(7):e0008412
pubmed: 32628664
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):1693-1695
pubmed: 33704451
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 May;42(5):636-637
pubmed: 32576296