Association Between Endometriosis Phenotype and Preterm Birth in France.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2022
01 02 2022
Historique:
entrez:
8
2
2022
pubmed:
9
2
2022
medline:
1
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Endometriosis is an inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous presentation that affects women of childbearing age. Given the limitations of previous retrospective studies, it is still unclear whether endometriosis has adverse implications for pregnancy outcomes. To evaluate the association between the presence of endometriosis and preterm birth and whether the risk varied according to the disease phenotype. This cohort study with exposed and unexposed groups was conducted in 7 maternity units in France from February 4, 2016, to June 28, 2018. Participants included women with singleton pregnancies who were followed up before 22 weeks' gestation along with their newborns delivered at or after 22 weeks' gestation. The final follow-up occurred in July 2019. Data were analyzed from October 7, 2020, to February 7, 2021. Women in the endometriosis group had a documented history of endometriosis and were classified according to 3 endometriosis phenotypes: isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SUP), ovarian endometrioma (OMA; potentially associated with SUP), and deep endometriosis (DE; potentially associated with SUP and OMA). Women in the control group did not have a history of clinical symptoms of endometriosis before their current pregnancy. The primary outcome was preterm birth between 22 weeks and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation. Association between endometriosis and the primary outcome was assessed through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and was adjusted for the following risk factors associated with preterm birth: maternal age, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) before pregnancy, country of birth, parity, previous cesarean delivery, history of myomectomy and hysteroscopy, and preterm birth. The same analysis was performed according to the 3 endometriosis phenotypes (SUP, OMA, and DE). Of the 1351 study participants (mean [SD] age, 32.9 [5.0] years) who had a singleton delivery after 22 weeks of gestation, 470 were assigned to the endometriosis group (48 had SUP [10.2%], 83 had OMA [17.7%], and 339 had DE [72.1%]) and 881 were assigned to the control group. No difference was observed in the rate of preterm deliveries before 37 weeks 0 days of gestation between the endometriosis and control groups (34 of 470 [7.2%] vs 53 of 881 [6.0%]; P = .38). After adjusting for confounding factors, endometriosis was not associated with preterm birth before 37 weeks' gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.64-1.77). The results were comparable for the different disease phenotypes (SUP: 6.2% [3 of 48]; OMA: 7.2% [6 of 83]; and DE: 7.4% [25 of 339]; P = .84). This cohort study found no association between endometriosis and preterm birth, and the disease phenotype did not appear to alter the result. Monitoring the pregnancy beyond the normal protocols or changing management strategies for women with endometriosis may not be warranted to prevent preterm birth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35133433
pii: 2788840
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47788
pmc: PMC8826171
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2147788Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Hum Reprod. 2012 Mar;27(3):702-11
pubmed: 22252082
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jan;109(1):142-147
pubmed: 29198848
Fertil Steril. 2006 Mar;85(3):564-72
pubmed: 16500320
Hum Reprod. 2009 Sep;24(9):2341-7
pubmed: 19439428
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006 Nov;34(11):1090-5
pubmed: 17092755
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019 Nov;15(11):666-682
pubmed: 31488888
Lancet. 2021 Feb 27;397(10276):839-852
pubmed: 33640070
Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):392-405
pubmed: 25432921
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009 Mar;28(3):275-81
pubmed: 19321292
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Dec;48(12):871-872
pubmed: 33011383
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Apr;77(1):67-75
pubmed: 12094777
Fertil Steril. 1992 Nov;58(5):924-8
pubmed: 1426377
Endocr Rev. 2014 Dec;35(6):851-905
pubmed: 25141152
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):70-103
pubmed: 26450609
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;51:16-24
pubmed: 29506961
Reprod Sci. 2020 Jan;27(1):309-315
pubmed: 32046376
Fertil Steril. 1997 Oct;68(4):585-96
pubmed: 9341595
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Dec;45(10):1446-1456
pubmed: 27836377
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):354.e1-354.e12
pubmed: 30625295
Fertil Steril. 2017 Oct;108(4):667-672.e5
pubmed: 28874260
Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Mar 1;25(2):137-158
pubmed: 30753453
Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Sep 11;25(5):592-632
pubmed: 31318420
Hum Reprod. 2018 Oct 1;33(10):1854-1865
pubmed: 30239732
Fertil Steril. 2017 Dec;108(6):895-912
pubmed: 29202964
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;200(6):615.e1-6
pubmed: 19136085
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jul 24;337(4):217-22
pubmed: 9227926
BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1538-43
pubmed: 22900995
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014 Jan;30(1):34-7
pubmed: 24134807
Biol Reprod. 2009 Jan;80(1):105-14
pubmed: 18815356
Hum Reprod. 2010 Apr;25(4):884-9
pubmed: 20129993
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec;46(10):701-713
pubmed: 29031048
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2:CD009591
pubmed: 26919512
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Apr;28(3):429-42
pubmed: 24461676
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1393-1401
pubmed: 28510724
BJOG. 2017 Feb;124(3):444-452
pubmed: 26887349
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 May;24(5):496-502
pubmed: 22417665
Fertil Steril. 2012 Jul;98(1):36-40
pubmed: 22658345
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;204(3):193-201
pubmed: 21094932
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Mar;198:12-21
pubmed: 26773243
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Oct;193:10-8
pubmed: 26207980
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;51(5):586-595
pubmed: 29154402
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jun;96(6):751-760
pubmed: 28181672
Fertil Steril. 2012 Jul;98(1):30-5
pubmed: 22386841
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Feb;45(2):155-64
pubmed: 26422365
Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):877-81
pubmed: 21071024
Hum Reprod. 2014 Aug;29(8):1666-76
pubmed: 24903201
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;53(11):1119-29
pubmed: 11106885
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):497-515
pubmed: 26912000
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 06;(6):CD004452
pubmed: 24903678