Subjective perception of spinal deformity after selective versus non-selective fusion of Lenke 1C curves.
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion
Quality-of-life profile for spinal deformities (QLPSD)
Revised scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22R)
Selective fusion
Spinal appearance questionnaire (SAQ)
Journal
Spine deformity
ISSN: 2212-1358
Titre abrégé: Spine Deform
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101603979
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
23
03
2021
accepted:
22
01
2022
pubmed:
9
2
2022
medline:
15
6
2022
entrez:
8
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the self-image perception and the Quality-of-Life (QoL) in female adolescents, with Lenke 1C scoliosis curves, treated with selective versus non-selective posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSF). Patients undergoing PSF for idiopathic adolescent scoliosis (AIS) were recruited and divided into two groups: patients managed with selective thoracic fusion (STF) were included in Group A, whereas patients treated with non-selective fusion (N-STF) in Group B. Each patient completed the Italian version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22R questionnaire (SRS-22R), the Quality-of-Life Profile for Spinal Deformities questionnaire (QLPSD) and the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ), before surgery and at 24-month follow-up. One hundred and fifty seven female patients (mean age 16.38) were included in this study. 80 patients underwent STF, while 77 patients received N-STF. At 24-month follow-up, patients managed with N-STF showed better SRS-22R self-image mean score (p = .012), SRS-22R satisfaction mean score (p = .033), QLPSD body image mean score (p = .005), but worse SRS-22 function mean score (p = .006) and QLPSD back flexibility mean score (p = .007), compared with patients who underwent STF. In terms of self-image perception, patients undergoing STF showed significantly worse SAQ total mean score (p = .002), SAQ appearance mean score (p = .001) and SAQ expectation (p = .001). We found a significant correlation between SAQ appearance mean score and SRS-22R self-image (R = - 0.721), SRS-22 mental health (R = - 0.8), QLPSD psychosocial functioning (R = 0.7) and QLPSD back flexibility (R = 0.8). Although the STF of Lenke 1C curves provides better functional outcomes, in the present study, female patients receiving STF revealed a worse perceived body image, compared with patients treated with N-STF, at 24-month follow-up. Particular attention should be addressed to the preoperative patient's mental health and body image perception, when choosing between STF and N-STF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35133641
doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00479-8
pii: 10.1007/s43390-022-00479-8
pmc: PMC9187554
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
855-863Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 15;36(18):E1240-4
pubmed: 21343853
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jun;23(6):1263-81
pubmed: 24682377
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 15;38(16):1380-5
pubmed: 23632336
Spine Deform. 2018 Nov - Dec;6(6):669-675
pubmed: 30348342
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Sep 15;20(18):2006-11
pubmed: 8578377
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983 Dec;65(9):1302-13
pubmed: 6654943
J Neurosurg Sci. 2019 Aug;63(4):372-378
pubmed: 27167472
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jan 15;102(2):143-150
pubmed: 31644521
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jun;26(6):1782-1788
pubmed: 27942937
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Apr;30(3):513-522
pubmed: 31760495
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Jun;40-A(3):529-54 passim
pubmed: 13539082
Global Spine J. 2021 Jun;11(5):686-689
pubmed: 32875904
Global Spine J. 2021 Jul;11(6):874-880
pubmed: 32677514
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Aug 21;101(16):1460-1466
pubmed: 31436653
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 15;35(24):E1412-7
pubmed: 21030889
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;33(7):E352-E358
pubmed: 32168119
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1169-81
pubmed: 11507125
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):721-30
pubmed: 26315956
Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):1987-1997
pubmed: 31236658
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018 Oct 10;3(2):113-125
pubmed: 31435563