Relationship Dynamics of Couples Facing Advanced-Stage Parkinson's Disease: A Dyadic Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
advanced Parkinson’s disease
couple dynamic
health psychology
interpretative phenomenological analysis
qualitative study
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
03
09
2021
accepted:
15
12
2021
entrez:
10
2
2022
pubmed:
11
2
2022
medline:
11
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Several studies have examined the impact of Parkinson's disease (PD) on the quality of couples' relationships. To date, few studies have explored how couples experience their relationship dynamic by taking into account the disease stage. The objectives of this study were to understand the experience of each partner and to study the mechanisms that underlie their couple organization in the advanced stage of PD. Semistructured individual interviews conducted with fifteen patients and their partners were the subject of a dyadic interpretative phenomenological analysis. Three themes were identified from the analysis: the first, "A Closeness That Separates," allows the identification of different patterns of interactions that lead to emotional distancing between the partners; the second, "The Adversity Is Not Unbearable, But Going It Alone Would Be," emphasizes the importance of how the assisting partner provides support; and the third, "Be Prepared for Anything and Facing an Uncertain Future," reveals the extent and modes of the dyadic regulation of the emotions linked to what the future may hold. Psychological support is important to help couples express both their feelings and their respective needs in the evolving context of PD.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Several studies have examined the impact of Parkinson's disease (PD) on the quality of couples' relationships. To date, few studies have explored how couples experience their relationship dynamic by taking into account the disease stage. The objectives of this study were to understand the experience of each partner and to study the mechanisms that underlie their couple organization in the advanced stage of PD.
METHODS
METHODS
Semistructured individual interviews conducted with fifteen patients and their partners were the subject of a dyadic interpretative phenomenological analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Three themes were identified from the analysis: the first, "A Closeness That Separates," allows the identification of different patterns of interactions that lead to emotional distancing between the partners; the second, "The Adversity Is Not Unbearable, But Going It Alone Would Be," emphasizes the importance of how the assisting partner provides support; and the third, "Be Prepared for Anything and Facing an Uncertain Future," reveals the extent and modes of the dyadic regulation of the emotions linked to what the future may hold.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Psychological support is important to help couples express both their feelings and their respective needs in the evolving context of PD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35140654
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.770334
pmc: PMC8818672
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
770334Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Constant, Brugallé, Wawrziczny, Sokolowski, Manceau, Flinois, Baille, Luc, Dujardin and Antoine.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Fam Nurs. 2016 May;22(2):224-51
pubmed: 27044337
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2017 Aug;124(8):983-996
pubmed: 27853927
Mov Disord. 2008 Sep 15;23(12):1673-80
pubmed: 18709684
Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Aug;41(6):621-30
pubmed: 15240086
Palliat Med. 2006 Mar;20(2):87-94
pubmed: 16613404
Cancer Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;36(3):213-20
pubmed: 22964867
J Fam Psychol. 2014 Oct;28(5):728-34
pubmed: 25180468
Neurol Sci. 2009 Apr;30(2):171-4
pubmed: 19189044
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
pubmed: 14399272
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;75(4):637-9
pubmed: 15026515
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Aug;21(15-16):2235-46
pubmed: 22788558
Br J Nurs. 2019 Jun 27;28(12):764-771
pubmed: 31242113
Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):459-480
pubmed: 30879893
Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Jul;41(5):515-24
pubmed: 15120980
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jan;43(1):76-84
pubmed: 31131646
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017 Apr;17(4):34
pubmed: 28324303
Neurology. 1967 May;17(5):427-42
pubmed: 6067254
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Mar;20(1):13-21
pubmed: 27364754
Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Dec;30(4):695-703
pubmed: 26453315
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(25-26):2490-508
pubmed: 21548821
J Health Psychol. 2018 Dec;23(14):1842-1852
pubmed: 28810353
Age Ageing. 2018 Jul 1;47(4):604-610
pubmed: 29617933
Soc Work Health Care. 2000;32(1):77-91
pubmed: 11291893
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2002 Oct;14(5):371-7
pubmed: 12602571
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2012 Mar;5(2):105-17
pubmed: 22435075
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 May;77(5):579-84
pubmed: 16614016
J Fam Nurs. 2005 Nov;11(4):344-9
pubmed: 16287834
Mov Disord. 2014 Jul;29(8):1035-43
pubmed: 24862344
BMC Neurol. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):50
pubmed: 30940119
JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):548-560
pubmed: 32044947
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Jun;31(6):1409-15
pubmed: 10849153
Dementia (London). 2016 Sep;15(5):1082-99
pubmed: 25305278
Parkinsons Dis. 2018 Sep 16;2018:9548681
pubmed: 30305888
Mov Disord. 1998 Jan;13(1):20-8
pubmed: 9452321